Are women who use their sexuality for personal gain any better than street whores?

That is not what you implied originally.

Good luck with that.

 

?Que?
What I stated originally is that I consider women who engage in using sex, sexuality or "feminine wilds" for gain is equal to prostitution. If you have a problem with this than you are the one who has a problem, not me. I am a Muslim so you allow your confused ideas about Muslims and Islam to place a negative connotation on everything that I post.
I am a Muslim and I do not apologize for it.

Here is what I originally posted in regards to this subject:

 

Exactly.

We are talking about success. Not status or how you rate pilots versus what the (*)(*)(*)(*) else you want to compare it to. If you tie your success in with your perceived status, then you are set for a very unnecessarily depressing life.

Income? Who cares? I can only make as much as the government allows me to make. That was part of the sacrifice in order to serve my country. Does it have anything to do with how successful I am? No. I think you have a backwards and stupid view of what success is. Note that I am not calling you stupid, so spare me more crying.

It does not really matter, but he is not a surgeon. He is an obstetrician. I was not going to correct you because it is menial to this discussion, but since you are going to keep throwing our titles around, might as well make it accurate.

My issue is that you confuse success with status. One matters to personal well-being. The other does not.

Give me a freaking break.

 

In my opinion, solving for official poverty on Earth may lead to better morals in any Capital based economy.

 

Well "Up On the Government" (the moniker says much about its holder), it may bother you that a man views women as more than objects but it matters not to me. In my mind, women are to be cherished, respected, protected and treated as the second half of ourselves.

 

Daniel,
Why would a system and the administrators of said system, which is based on the amassment of wealth, have concern for poor people?

 

I wasn't even talking about success vs status. In fact, no one was on this thread. If that's your issue I didn't even state an opinion about it, so I guess you can chill now.

 

Do you recognize a difference between, say, a cheerleader in the NFL and a "sex worker" at a brothel in Nevada?

Is there a fundamental difference between the way they use their bodies for personal gain (read: money)?

Or does the only real difference lie in the level of debasement? They both use their bodies to make money, one is just a little more flagrant about it.

 

I'll need Pictures for further investigation ...

 

And you felt the need to edit your post to add this? In bold?!

Weird behavior, dude.


`

 

I am a Muslim and I do not apologize for it.


So it looks like nobody is asking or telling you to now is there. If you want to believe in an idiotic religion and idiotic bible that is your privledge.

 

Let me start by saying "Welcome to Political Forum!"

You've said something that I find interesting, and I'd like to engage in a discussion with you about it. I have no intent or desire to denigrate your religion, beliefs, or customs - I'm merely looking for a little enlightenment.

With that said...

Suppose there is a woman, a reasonably attractive woman - it makes no difference what race or religion she is - who is shopping in the marketplace. The merchant sees her, and is attracted to her because she is pretty. Because she is pretty, the merchant treats her a little better than the other customers - perhaps he is more attentive to her, perhaps he sells her very best of his products, or perhaps if she buys a dozen oranges he will give her one for free.

The woman knows this, and is not only flattered by the attention, but also makes it a point to shop at this particular merchant because of the way he treats her.

Is she using her feminine charms to persuade the merchant to treat her different than the regular customers? Or, is it that the merchant is treating her differently because he is attracted to her - not because of anything she intentionally does?

Also, is there not a difference between this woman and an actual prostitute?

I look forward to your reply!

 

I wish it were more socially acceptable for women to use their superior understanding of supply side economics, and simply use us guys for sex until we clamor for a relationship.

 

You hit a nerve, Mike, b/c she made it all about her........

 

What objection can there be to having less excuse to lie to chics for sex, if it were more socially acceptable for chics to use men for sex until we clamor for a relationship?

 

Or ask for seconds.

 

The point is we would no longer need to resort to the abomination of hypocrisy, merely to prove our loyalty to the Animal Kingdom instead of a god.

 

Yes I did, if it is any of your business.

 

Interesting comment and response, Daniel.

 

In the name of Allah The Beneficent The Merciful

The murderer
The pedophile
The killer of innocent women and children. and the list goes on.

 

Uhhhh... no. Apparently no thought was given.

 

I wasn't trying to hit a nerve, but with some people you can't help but trip on one.

 

agreed yes and no, a nurse who marries a doctor for a few years presents a more complicated agreement than a wealthy businessman soliciting a prostitute for one night to be classified as the same

but this goes both ways, kevin federline is an example of the male version of the 'complex agreement'

as my divorce attorney said, its best to marry in the same income bracket as well as having a financial agreement in place for the 'marriage' to initiate proper distinction

 

You said some (*)(*)(*)(*) about not treating women like objects and then when on to compare them to objects. The stupidity in that alone is hilarious, but let me actually tell you why your post engaged my gag reflex. "Diamonds that they are" is a freaking ridiculous statement. It is that kind of grandiose language that masks a deeper issue.

And the name is "Up On the Governor." How did you read the Quran if you cannot even read a simple phrase? Sheesh.

Actually, you were. You are confused about the link between the two. Chill? What is this, the 80s?

No, you did not hit a nerve. You said something stupid and I corrected it. I guess you can chill now.