As the nation awaits a Kyle Rittenhouse verdict, some raise eyebrows at the judge

I know this one! It makes you a moose! What do I win?

 

You aren’t making any sense.

Kyle is a hero.

 

So then shooting a person makes you a murderer then right ?

No please show the evidence that the men killed were actually “rioting” ….go ahead, Ill wait

 

Simple, they were attacking Rittenhouse.

 

No, by YOUR standard he is a murderer.

Until you can show that those men who were killed were looting, rioting, or anything of the sort, then they get the same qualified classification as the the defendant, right ?

 

The second and third were. AFTER he had killed someone.

How are their actions at that point not viewed as exactly those of Rittenhouse are viewed by the right ?

 

After Rosenbaum, someone that started fires so the definition of a rioter, attacked Kyle.

 

You are aware that witnesses under oath described Rosenbaum as having set a garbage bin on fire and then rolled it out to the street but you probably didn't watch the trial did you?

 

did you watch the vid? It shows the pedo pushing a dumpster in flames towards the gas station. Come back after you watch the vid, this will make a lot more sense.

 

Aggravated Assault, Attempted murder, assault with a deadly weapon, assault to a minor, plenty. They obviously were attacking someone by chasing him. They pursued him he didn’t pursue them.

 

False, there is no rational interpretation of anything I have said to determine my logic would make him a murderer.

They were rioting and looting, the video evidence is out there. Your inability to stay informed on this topic is not my fault.

 

True. People defending property or police officers would not be considered rioters. The ones looting, burning and attacking those defending against such actions ARE rioters.

 

And were any of them Kyle Rittenhouse ?

And did any of them testify at the trial ?

It’s a serious question.

 

Think it was captured on film fella. I just know that under oath that was described and there is film to back it up. You thought you had a gotcha. You didn't. Time to move on.

 

You left out one very important detail….they only chased him AFTER he shot someone.

So at that point, are not they the ones protecting themselves, and others, from a guy with a gun ?

 

Again, your proof that al of them were doing what you claim ?

 

Then show the video ?

Your claim, show the proof

 

That’s not true. The original person shot threatened him then pursued him. He most definitely was chased into a car lot by his first attacker.

I’ll even use your liberal media to make you feel warm and cozy inside

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.nytimes.com/article/kyle-rittenhouse-shooting-timeline.amp.html

 

So you didn't watch the trial then. No need to talk to you until you do.

 

Actually I do think he reads up on this stuff. You would be a moron to come to a political forum without reading political topics. It’s just that I’m sure he reads fake news CNN, CBS or MSNBC who are currently still lying about the facts of this case.

 

MORE LIARS IN HIGHER ED: Fitchburg State U. offers safe spaces after Rittenhouse verdict; includes 3 lies in campus email.

“Fitchburg will host several safe spaces on Monday and Tuesday. Make note that these spaces are racially separate.”

They offer the safe spaces both “virtual and in-person physical” to suit your individual safetyism needs.

The liars at the school claim — wrongly — "that Jacob Blake, the protests for whom brought Rittenhouse to Kenosha, Wisconsin in the first place, died after being shot by police." Jacob is still very much alive.

Fitchburg’s Liars for the Center for Diversity and Inclusiveness falsely claimed "that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with an “automatic” weapon." It wasn't an automatic weapon and young Kyle didn't crossed state lines with it.

So, they are "deeply concerned" but, not so concerned that they would get basic facts right.

 

“With a plastic bag” ? Are you serious ?

 

That obviously wasn’t the full story. He also tried to take his gun before being shot. As per witness testimony

The point is you obviously don’t know the facts of the case. You’re arguing blindly.

 

Why tell the truth when there are no consequences? I didn’t check but he probably has tenure so he can lie to his hearts content, be as racist and evil as he chooses and not have a care on the world. Besides, any one who associates themselves with any sort of Diversity Center on any college or in a corporation are useless lying shills.