At least 3 children and 3 adults killed in Nashville elementary school shooting

You say this, my source says "guns used in states with stricter gun laws typically flow from states with weaker laws". Can you stop making up crap that supports your agenda? It's getting dull and I'm paid to fact check you.

 

That is one way is dismiss and demean the danger smash n grabs have in addition to mere shoplifting.

It is also property damage, assault, theft and/or robbery.

 

Yes, "guns". That can mean two of them.

Show us where it is a significant number. Funny, you already rejected the source I posted that stated it was an insignificant number and you insist it is a major one. So show us your proof and do not just repeat vague claims.

 

It is robbery. They use force and threat of violence to steal, that is the very definition.

Does not matter if it is a single person or a mob.

 

I quoted my source. You are disputing it with NOTHING to back it up.

 

Tranny mob assaults and kidnaps female sports speaker. Campus police let them, don't make any arrests, nor even both to take a report from the victim. <Rule 2>

 

Oh boy, this again. I expect you to reject it like you have before though.

https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/guns/procon/guns.html

Of the firearms recovered in California in 2017, 17,397 came from inside California. The state with the second highest number of firearms was Arizona with a paltry 2,185. According to page 7 of an ATF report.

https://www.atf.gov/docs/undefined/cawebsite17183919pdf/download

https://bjs.ojp.gov/content/pub/pdf/suficspi16.pdf.

https://www.pacificresearch.org/gun-violence-increases-in-california/

There, getting an idea yet how horribly wrong you are? I can keep going, but it is likely pointless as you will reject all of this as you have everything else.

Nothing to back it up indeed. I have, multiple times. You simply reject it each and every time as it does not comply with your beliefs.

 

Keen difference is that my source is about how people arm themselves to commit a crime.
Your source includes the crime of somebody buying a weapon for their mother who is a lawful owner of multiple weapons, since that's a straw purchase and all of that.

This one specifically says this is about guns traced which may or may not have been part of a crime.

This is specifically about people being locked up for a crime, and it casually doesn't mention where them guns are from.
Typical.

This is specifically about people being locked up for a crime, and it casually doesn't mention where them guns are from.
Typical.

 

Yet you ignore anything that does not follow what you believe.

Got it, talking to you is pointless because your mind is made up and no matter what facts are presented, you ignore them and still insist you are right.

 

You're ignoring the part where I argue how it's not what you say it is.

 

Odd, you sound like one of those guys who quotes studies and calls it scientific evidence. And one who will argue when evidence to the contrary is presented, and try and pretend statistics don’t count. And someone who has said we should treat criminals softer.

 

I could not care less what you think. As I said, you simply dismiss any source that does not agree with you.

You have a serious disconnect with reality.

 

Dismissive wanking gesture

 

Equal protection is not inferred or implied ffs. Its LITERALLY there in plain ****ing English.
It LITERALLY applies to ANY form of racial discrimination. Can a white man marry a white woman? Yes? Then a black man can too.
And vice versa.
Can any white man use that fountain? Then any black man can as well.
See how that works?

Put the pointy hat away.

 

Uh-huh.

Says the person that can not comprehend or make an actual argument so goes off into things that have nothing to do with it.

By your argument, taking weapons from the mentally ill and criminals might be taken as violating "equal protection".

 

Yeah well. You do not support laws making my examples a crime.
So there is that.

 

FFS. Showing you simply don't understand the basic text.

See the 4th amendment? What does that say dear? Read it for the class and tell us what you think it means.

 

It was a woman this time? That's newsworthy in itself.

 

Biden admin continues to hide the manifesto of the trans mass killer.