There are still too many people like you who can't stand another person's point of view, and/or have been seduced by the PC mob. This judgement and your arrogant assumption that it must be right (even though it is replete with legal goobledook)represents a gross blight on Australians' right to freedom of speech. Obviously you have never heard of a Higher court, one which enable appellants to challenge the decision of a Lower Court. Maybe you should refrain from going out in the hot QLd sun!
You know it, I know it,everyone knows it.This case was undertaken for the sole purpose of protecting these so called Indigenous persons from their comfortable sinecures, and to clamp down on anyone who challenges their (partial)ethnicity, an ethnicity that entiltles them to special privledges.
Oh1 I love this bit of verbal thuggery: 'Careful now - you are heading towards litigation yourself the way you are talking.' You evidently intensely despise Free Speech.
WHAT "special privileges"? Come on, list them and provide links. The few "special privileges" that they DO get are FAR outweighed by a bloody lot of other problems!
No - I believe the case was undertaken for the sole purpose of protecting these so called Indigenous persons from being defamed and having this defamation used as ridicule against them. And the judge found in their favour. Bolt told lies. He defamed them. And his defamation was racist in intent. Why are you trying to defend the lies Bolt told?
What are YOU on about? It is well known (unless you live on the moon) that a large proportion of our indigenous population receive a multitude of special benefits, commonly referred to as 'sit down money' (otherwise known as Passive Welfare}from the Federal Government. Don't tell me you have never heard of that expression? For what other reason did the Liberal Government, and basically endorsed by the Current Federal Labor Government and Noel Pearson, introduce a system whereby a 50% of their welfare benefits are quarantined to ensure the children receive adequate food? It was well known that a substantial amount of welfare benefits to Aboriginal people was being (mis)used to purchase alcohol with its attendant (often violent) social problems. If you don't believe me just ask Noel Pearson, a leader of his community in Northern Qld. Here is a snippet of his view point on Aboriginal passive welfare extracted from 'Creative Spirits' publication earmarked as the Northern Territory Emergence Response (NTER)—"The Intervention: 'Aboriginal people’s sad inheritance from the welfare state Transfers from federal and state budgets to individuals and families without reciprocation is the principal source of income of Aboriginal society in Cape York Peninsula today. It has become common usage to equate welfare with such unconditional cash pay-outs to needy citizens of whom nothing further will be required. I have coined the term ‘passive welfare’ in order to distinguish between this narrow usage of the word and the full scope of ‘the welfare state’.
Please list the "multitude of special benefits" the Indigenous receive. Perhaps the Northern Territory Intervention is a "special priviledge", do you think? Because curtailing people's lives is a "special priviledge", isn't it? If you ask nicely, who knows, the government may agree to give you such a "special priviledge", and Intervene in your life,too. Here, a present for you: [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hhqAFLud228"]Paul Keating - The Redfern Address - Australian Labor Party - YouTube[/ame]
Our indigenous brothers must get their act together and realise that the world does not owe them a living. It has to be earned. 'Sit Down' money just kills your spirit! And don't listen to those who suck off your blood and want you to remain in the distant, antiquated past forever. The world moves on, and those who don't move with it will be left behind in the dusty, archaic archives of history.
Sit Down money, pure and simple. And there are a host of benefits available to the indigenous Community, especially if you decide to live in a remote area. I suggest you access the Centrelikk website (very simple) and you will find them listed there.
Why are the Aborigines so much more hopeless than the Maori? Who, let's face it, have been pretty hopeless.
What bloody other problems, name them go on, the bloody lot of other problems aboriginals have are caused by themselves by not getting of their asses and helping themselves always expecting whitey to do it for them. 1)cheaper bank loans from Aboriginal social service groups to which there is a (*)(*)(*)(*) load of gov funded programs just for aboriginals whites need not apply. 2)aboriginal only jobs(funded by aussie taxpayers) 3)sporting grants for Aboriginals(islanders,africans,middle easterners etc as well but no sports grants for whitey ,whitey has to contend with all those comers for his spot, while their spots are garaunteed). 4)priority housing 5)Aboriginal tv channel(wheres our white channel?) 6)Aboriginal sports awards?(wheres our European sports awards?) 7)Race specific programs,educational,social etc etc benefits Please do list all these problems aboriginals have...
Hmmm - I should feed you to a couple of Maori friends of mine!! One of the reasons is that until 1967 they were considered to be "animals" not human and were classified as such under the Flora and Fauna act of Australia. That was within most people's life times.
Links please - otherwise these are just "pub myths" Living in an area with a LOT of indigenous people I can tell you that most of the above is just bull(*)(*)(*)(*) and I LOVE number 5 - we have all the other bloody TV channels!! Try reading this! http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/cgi...RrnaMUyA#search="welfare benefits aboriginal" and ask yourself if any "whities" are given the special privilege of "income management" Is it a "special privilege" to have your income linked to your child's school attendance? http://www.aeufederal.org.au/Publications/2008/LBehrendtpaper.pdf
The Flora and Fauna Act? So they were classified as vegetables? I wonder if any other country has legislated part of its people so horticulturally.
The way some of these ABO'S chooseto live is no better than animals. And i say choose because they do have the CHOICE to do better but its all too hard aye. By far its easier to sit back and CLAIM to be discriminated against and reap the goverment paycheck. They can then get pissed, beat their gin, rape their kids and never have to answer to it all because we white people are just racist...WHAT A FRIGGEN JOKE.
maybe they did maybe they didnt but its NOT the point. The point is that the ABO'S are doing it NOW in MODERN times.
Could be wrong. But I thought they gave up cannabilsm in favour of McDonalds. And I don't fancy being served up in a bun.
Not all white people are racist. Andrew Bolt is white though, and he was recently found to have breached the Racial Discrimination Act. So I guess you can call him a racist if you want.