Ba'ath Syria or Saudi/Wahhabi Syria, which one do you prefer?

something is really wrong wit you , how can you call pan- Arabists for commy? "Ba'athism is based on principles of Arab nationalism, pan-Arabism, Arab socialism, as well as social progress. It is a secular ideology"

 

A representative government formed and elected by the Syrian people.

 

question: which opposition party is the biggest in Syria?

 

When we adopt Wahhabism as our official religion and follow its legal and social strictures, then we will have become Wahhabi.

According to a Pravda Forums refugee...

 

Since when has Syria had an open political system?

 

In 1991, the USA official adopted the Talmudic Noahide laws as local, national and international policy. Under this system they only need 1 witness to convict any goiym of a crime.

That is why the officials can tell any lie to justify their wars against individuals and nations. Whoever they go against has already been convicted. And if they don't follow the Noahide judgment, they are in big trouble.

What's this gotta do with Muslim Brotherhoods & Wahhabis?

Much of Islam has been Talmudized and follows the Noahide rules. And, USA and Europe actively support Talmudized Muslims to go around cutting off the heads of Christians in Chechnia, Yugoslavia, Iraq, Afghanistan, Lybia and Syria.

Thus we are no different than they. Under US law, if you join a gang of thieves and one of them murders someone, all the gang members are guilty of murder.

Thus we are just waiting for the Saudi's to Muslim Brotherhood America too.

 

The clue to your answer is right in Stephen Schwartz's article, litwin. For the most part, the problem concerning Wahhabi penetration in the United States is one that effects our Muslim community, and since most Americans are Christians, it is a problem that they are unlikely to confront in their own personal lives.

On the other hand, there are a large number of Americans who are well aware of this problem and that it is not confined to the American Muslim community. However, the Americans who expose the nature and agenda of Wahhabists in the United States are often subjected to charges of "Islamophobia" by Islamist groups such as CAIR (the most prominent and infamous member of the so-called "Wahhabi Lobby" in Washington DC) who have a history of slandering and suing their critics in order to silence them. One of the most prominent examples of this harassment was CAIR's lawsuit against one of its harshest critics, Andrew Whitehead:

CAIR Libel Suit Against Anti-CAIR’s Andrew Whitehead Dismissed "With Prejudice"
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/Dismissed

 

I stopped reading your Pravdian psychobabble right there, sport...

 

did i use word "open"? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syrian_opposition

 

whats strange here, that you fight wahhabists in A-stan. P-stan, Iraq in the same time you gave whole american muslim community in their bloody hands , even Russian corrupt government choose to keep wahhabism outside country and heads of the local muslims

 

No, you didn't, but there's a point to my question.

Here in the United States, political parties didn't develop until well after our revolution, and many a political party has come and gone since then. For example, one of our original political parties, the Federalist party, went extinct in 1823, and one of our contemporary parties, the Republican party, didn't exist until 1854.

It will take years for the Syrian people to fully develop political parties that represent the broad spectrum of political belief in that country.

 

Our government doesn't have the constitutional authority to prevent Wahhabis, or the members of any other religious sect, from lawfully practicing their religion in this country. It's up to our Muslims to reject that ideology and the Wahhabist influence-peddling emanating from Saudi Arabia and other countries, and it's my impression that most American Muslims do reject it.

 

Looks like you're still reading it, but can't controvert that we are under the Talmudic Noahide laws.

 

really ? even cult kali? how ? 90 % of all american masques under wahhab- control, your know money talks ...

 

do you think wahhabi international /muslim brotherhood will gave Syria a time a right to choice ?

 

It's always easy to controvert the delusions of Pravda flunkies.

Familiarize yourself with the United States Constitution sometime, sport - it's the Law that Americans live under:

http://www.house.gov/house/Constitution/Constitution.html

 

I can't verify Sheikh Kabbani's claim (which is 80%) and I don't recall him substantiating it himself. Many mosques in this country are run by groups like the Nation of Islam, so I think the sheik is overestimating the scale of Wahhabist control over American mosques.

That having been said, you're right - where there's Wahhabist money, there will be an effort to promote the tenets of that cult. How much success they're having with that effort is another story, however...

 

Who knows? That depends on how much power and influence the other opposition parties wield.

Unlike Egypt, where Mubarak, et al, found it in their interest to give the Muslim Brotherhood some space to operate, both Hafez and Bashar al-Assad have done a pretty effective job of tamping down the Ikhwan in Syria, and I'm skeptical that there's much popular support for the Wahhabist terrorists that are becoming increasingly active in that country.

 

whats funny here that they (Saudi wahhabists)attacked you on 9/11 and noting has happened to them
ps

 

and

....

 

i think you are wrong here, its a real war in the Syria, Syria has one of the biggest and effective army in region, who they fight with? the desires are incapable to fight a regular army, its wahhabi international professional mujahedins who fight Syrian army. [video=youtube;Y6DrPzZlqLY]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6DrPzZlqLY[/video]

 

The Afghanistan´s secular regime was holding by Soviet troops. And US and bin Laden knew it.
In 1989 Soviet troops had withdrawn from Afghanistan. And this regime collapsed in 3 years

 

The Afghanistan´s secular regime could hold quite good by itself , but not against bunch of the religions countries (P-stan, Usa, Israel , etc) and the entire institution of Wahhabi-international

 

The US armed and trained the Taliban central forces and kept them out of the Russia resistance struggle so that they could more easily take over from those foolish enough to have wasted themselves fighting the Russians.

 

The Saudi guys were just fall guys. The Saudis did not pull off 9/11.

And the incredibly stupid so called Americans ignored all valid evidence and bought into the lies about Afghanistan and Iraq.