Barbarians Storm US Embassy in Egypt

QFT.....

 

In the fine tradition of Walter Duranty...

 

But on the flip side, the NYT is running a great week-long contest: If you can correctly name each of the ten front-page stories that they completely made up, you win a free years subscription!

 

Actually, because the people killed in Libya were innocent, it would be the ones who killed them who would be punished with Sharia.

In what universe is killing innocent people justifiable in Islam? Really?

 

When was the last time this was enforced? 700 BC?

the Islamic Universe of Sharia Law.

It's no secret that this is what ALL Muslims strive for whether they are mentally in that place now or not. they eventually gravitate towards it.

 

And you actually believe this?

To put it simply, you're an idiot. An idiot who is now on ignore.

 

I'm asking you. do you even know when the last time Sharia Law punished a suicide bomber? or were you just deflecting as usual?

I'm too much for you to handle in a debate. I get that. Ignore is the only way to avoid my wrath of knowledge against your cult. Back to the Kabba Stone for you.

 

When's the last time Christians rioted when their symbols were desecrated or misrepresented?
(*)(*)(*)(*) Muzzies wherever they are. Dip their Quran in pig (*)(*)(*)(*) and call it art. It's only fair to do to theirs what they do to ours.

 

Ask your thug co-religionists in Benghazi who feel that violence is justified, OJ. You're barking up the wrong tree, sport...

 

This questions needs to be asked over and over - WHY, did the military lay back while these *******s mounted the wall, got off and got the flag, took the flag to the top of the wall, tear up the flag -& then burn pieces of the flag. The whole time this was allowed to happen, UNTIL they were finished. Why was this allowed to happen? So they could get the whole thing on camera and show it to the world?

 

No, no, no. YOU said it. So I am asking you. That is how a conversation works, right?

 

In the universe where the unbelievers are not innocent.

[4.92] And it does not behoove a believer to kill a believer except by mistake,

 

Somebody who studied Islam and claims to know more than I do shouldn't ask such a stupid question. Google is your friend, and Saudi Arabia likes executing people
How can anybody punish a suicide bomber though?

Looool yep that is definitely it.

Ya haram... Why do people kill other people because of idiots like this....

Anyway...

Back to my ignore list for you

And back on topic... So Libya apologized. When do we hear some names? Some punishments?

Meanwhile, after accomplishing his goal to stir up some Muslims, and instigating the death of 4 innocent Americans in Libya, where is our little Californian self-proclaimed "Israeli" friend? Oh yes, he is hiding. Well done.

Perhaps the ones who incited the violence in Egypt and Libya should also be punished? But nah, its just easier to judge 2 billion Muslims, and millions of Libyans and Egyptians.

Does free speech also include incitement?

 

No, conversation works when questions and answers come forth from discussion.

What you're doing is just posting your opinions, failing to acknowledge or agree with your Cult's actions.

That's called deflecting.

 

you blabbed out that nonsense, YOU go google your own BS. I have no time for Cult research unless is factual.

and FYI, GENIUS, some of the suicide bombers make a boo boo and live. what happens to them? I bet they get a Sharia Law holiday for being a partial-Martyr or something. only 10 virgins, not 72.

yep, he's hiding just like the Muslim women who hide C4 jumpsuits under their Burkas.

 

What? Try again with a relevant Quran verse.

And, you could also explain to me what these 4 Americans were guilty of. With a verse from the Quran to back it up.

Thanks.

 

Yes, yes, yes. YOUR thug co-religionists stormed our consulate and killed our ambassador over that "blasphemous" movie. Ask THEM why they feel that violence and murder is justified under Islam and Shari'a.

 

Show me where they say what they did was justified by Sharia.

So far I have only seen you say this. And my question was directed to you in response to you saying it.

See how that works?

 

Why didn't they fire their weapons?
Ask Obama.

 

I can see how your disingenuous deflections "work", sport.

There's no disputing the fact that the protests and violence were a reaction to the "blasphemous" nature of "Innocence of Muslims". Had the mobs responsible for that violence felt that the film was not "blasphemous" for its negative depiction of Muhammad and that their violence was not justified under Islam and Shari'a, they would have never committed those acts of violence.

See how THAT works? It seems like everyone but you saw how that worked in Cairo and Banghazi yesterday.

You can find the rationale behind the violence and the protests all over the Internet. Why aren't you capable of finding it yourself - because you don't want to face the ugly truth? It's no secret that Muslims have been killing people who mocked, ridiculed and otherwise "blasphemed" Muhammad since the days he allegedly walked this earth. Don't you read your own holy texts or history books?

 

He cannot see how that works. the truth is not in him.

Because Muslims are 100% liars. and this practice is called Taqqiyah and Allah (pbuh) is Ok with this. this is what they practice daily. We in the West can never understand this type of thinking because we are not savages that follow an illiterate caveman's doctrine and lie 24/7. This is Islam.

Also, Lying aka Taqqiyah is A-Ok when a Muslim feels the need to sliver their way out of a sticky situation, wether to avoid capture or integrate into a society. this is how they populated the UK so fast. It's in the Quran, they acknowledge that this is ok.

but OJLeb will not acknowledge any of this, therefore, you can count him as a liar in most cases.


Yeshua condemns lying thousands of times in the Bible. but Muslims love it though.

 

So in other words, they didn't say it was justifiable with Sharia, but you just assumed it was.

Did they really? Which is why when Muhammad (peace be upon him) retook Mecca from the pagans - the same pagans which killed and tortured Muslims and tried to kill him - he didn't harm any of them. Which is why Muhammad (peace be upon him) never started the wars with the Pagans who wanted to kill him. Which is why Islam allows killing for people who kill others and cause chaos for society as the only two acceptable reasons. Which is why when Muhammad's (peace be upon him) neighbor got sick - the same neighbor who threw garbage on him daily - he helped her get back to good health. Which is why Muhammad (pbuh) did not kill the woman who poisoned him.

Need I go on?

 

The protesters who stormed the consulate in Libya and the embassy in Egypt said they did so because the film was "blasphemous". If they didn't feel their violent reaction to this "blasphemous" film wasn't justified, they wouldn't have committed those acts of violence. Those are the facts.

Does the name Abu 'Afak ring a bell?

Need I go on?

Perhaps, we can discuss the contemporary "blasphemers" who have been killed or condemned to death for "blaspheming" Islam or Muhammad? Perhaps, we can discuss where we might find the legal source for these charges and sentences...

 

The press release came out prior to either the attack of the consulate in Benghazi or the attack of the embassy in Cairo.

 

Like the drugged up delusional reich wingers say on this forum,


BLAME OBAMA!