Biden got money from Ukraine

And the beat goes on ...

 

They cant. Because it happened.

 

Yes, I remember the impeachment.
Now what?

 

One of my liberal Facebook friends unfriended me over this.
I’m genuinely confused as to why liberals react this way. The source is legitimate, nobody disputes authenticity of the audio and no one disputes authenticity of the wire transfers. So, instead of discussing this reality we have people on the left shutting their ears and screaming “debunked”, “Russian”, “troll”, and other things.
If this was debunked - shouldn’t it be easy to find an article that debunks these claims by attacking the meat of the problem, instead of attacking the messenger?

 

The OP is relaying propaganda from a Russian agent to attack Trump's opponent. Sorry, but Russia comes up way too much with this guy.

 

From the article (translated)

"From the account of Burisma-Holding, which was opened for the personal needs of Mykola Zlochevsky, to the account of the American company Rosemont Seneca (the firm run by Kerry and Biden's kids), the same non-round sum was repeated 20 times - $ 833,333 for a total of $ 3.4 million." - Kulik noted.

The prosecutor showed a video in which Latvian money laundering experts allegedly tell how they helped Ukrainians and Americans to launder huge sums.

"Since 2010, together with other people, we have provided services to legalize their illegal income. To do this, we have registered dozens of companies offshore. It is about the amount of ten million dollars a month,"

 

I agree. Biden needs to clarify. I'm sure there is a good reason that his son was paid millions from a company he has nothing to do with in a country he has never been to for a job he knows nothing about.

 

Yeah, why can’t Biden come out and debunk this?

 

There is plenty of evidence that Hunter was placed on the board to provide cover for a backdoor deal with Burisma transfering US manufactured pipeline equipment to Gazprom. This directly helped Putin build his South Stream pipeline into the Crimea.

So the first question was:

Did U.S. envoy Marie Yovanovitch try to project a firewall by providing the names of individuals who should not be looked at for corruption? In a speech, did Marie Yovanovitch, then the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, publicly called for, “Independent corporate governance teams,” at Naftogaz and other state companies to, “be able to continue their reform work with full autonomy and integrity?” Was this an attempt to keep any new efforts by the Ukrainian government in check by recommending a hands off approach?

We now know by way of FOIA releases that Yovanovitch lied through her teeth during Congressional hearings. She knew exactly what was being covered up and who she was trying to protect. AKA Biden, Obama and Rienzi.

 

his son tricking a foreign company into hiring his has nothing to do with Biden, now if Biden hires his family to work in the white house like Trump has, that will be a different story

 

Had the title of this thread been Trump got money from Ukraine, you would have been all over it like a Seagull on a bag of French Fries and screaming for President Trumps imprisonment, but since it's about a Democrat named Joe Biden you call it complete Bull

 

This is about as lame of an explanation as this forum has experienced in a long time. Now the expletive is, " TRICKED " ???


In reality there are only two reasons to put a foreigner on a governing board. The first is expertise. The second is some other form of benefit.

A Senate hearing featuring Natalia Cherenkova, would be the best way to dismiss this lame quandary. But Koch-Glitsch would try to vigorously squash it.

 

Why do I need to supply you with something that you already know about?

 

meanwhile Trump children work for the white house and overseas governments into give them patents and stuff and help them out with failing building like the Trump's 666 building

yes, the Trump family owned a building with the address "666"

 

There was NOTHING about the Burisma payments to the corporation that was paying HUNTER Biden that anything at all to do with money laundering. Those were PAYROLL deposits for Hunter Biden and others who had been HIRED by Burisma.

 

That has already been CLARIFIED during the Impeachment Hearings.

Why are you BEATING this DEAD horse again?

 

https://nypost.com/2020/05/15/yovanovitch-may-have-misled-congress-over-burisma-knowledge/

"But the 160 pages of emails and memos obtained by Citizens United show Yovanovitch was in contact with US officials about Burisma and also met with a representative from the Ukrainian company in her embassy office just 45 days before Trump took office."

An ambassador usually doesn't lie under oath for the fun of it. And she decided to leave her cushy job working for the State Department at Georgetown University out of thin air.

FOIA sometimes does clearly expose corruption. The Burisma situation smells of a massive coverup. No wonder Joe bragged about taking out Victor Shokin.

 

Because it was DEBUNKED during the Impeachment hearings that you claim to know about.

 

Wow. Talk about a deflect

 

I smell fear. You libs are running away from this faster than a bunny rabbit from a forest fire.

 

Bottom Line: Obama allowed Koch Glitsch pipeline equipment to be sold to Russia in return for kickbacks that went through Latvia and then into Burisma bank accounts in Cyprus.

Hunter Biden was a plant to keep the money transfers from being questioned.

 

Doubtful, but possible. He was impeached for trying to uncover just this sort of thing. It is interesting the lengths the left went to flip this back on Trump the first time.

 

Clear evidence that Yovanovitch lied during Congressional hearings and they are saying it is beating a dead horse.

 

I'll admit the rabbit hole concerning Ukraine is way over my head, but no way any company is tricked by Hunter Biden to the tune 3.4 million. The guy just ain't that smart.