Biden met with Hunter Biden business partner at White House in 2010: Report

Biden met with Hunter Biden business partner at White House in 2010: Report (msn.com)

So let's see.... Joe Biden claims he knew nothing about Hunter's business deals.
Remember when he said he nothing about Hunter's business deals?

His voters, and supporters were duped. Actually, the entire country was duped into believing Joe Biden possessed the integrity to befitting of the presidency.

So, let's get back to why Biden may have met with Hunter's business partner at the WH in 2010. Anyone have some ideas or other input they'd like to add?

 

I'll meet your pearl clutching, and raise you:

 

Is this the argument that two wrongs make a right? Or just the typical "whataboutism"?

 

There's two types of deniability. Plain and plausible. The Bidens will continue to use the latter, while his supporters will just stay with the former. An ostrish can stick his head in the sand. I'm not sure where the supporters of Biden denying there is anything corrupt going on with them put theirs.

 

Other than Carter, every president since at least JFK was corrupt

Except for Nixon, so far, they have all gotten away with it

If Biden has nothing to hide then he should be encouraging an investigation

 

Well, the corruption of all of them would make for an interesting discussion, but we are currently discussing the Bidens. Or would you prefer not to?

 

My point was one of frustration, that they all get away with it. Clinton being the far worst offender. A lot of his supporters denied as does Biden's

Biden is probably corrupt. I hope that there is a full investigation as money transactions should be pretty easy to prove

 

My apology. You have every right to be frustrated. We all need to see accountability and yet in political circles it seems like it isn't in fashion.

 

There's no way that a family which has been selling access to Ol' Joe for some 50 years aren't going to leave a trail of evidence, should someone investigate a little bit and and find it. Further evidence:

• • Two of them stick out: The first is a 2015 missive from a Ukrainian businessman thanking Hunter for the chance to meet Joe Biden—then, still vice president. The second is a 2017 email in which a proposed equity breakdown of a venture with Chinese energy executives included the line, “10 held by H for the big guy?”
  • The Post had reported, in great detail, how it had physically obtained Hunter’s laptop. It had interviewed the owner of the Delaware computer shop where Hunter had abandoned his computer. It had Hunter’s signature on a receipt. The Post had on-the-record sources with intimate knowledge of Hunter’s interactions. And later, the emails were authenticated by forensic specialists.
    Yet virtually the entire censorious journalistic establishment, with the help of tech giants, attempted to limit the story’s exposure by banning it outright, creating the impression that it didn’t meet proper journalistic standards or that it had been planted by Russian spooks.
• When Hunter’s former partner and Navy veteran Tony Bobulinski was interviewed on “Tucker Carlson Tonight,” he claimed he’d had a business meeting with Joe Biden in 2017 and that the former vice president had been intimately involved in the family business for years. We now have emails that lend credence to those claims.
• Does anyone believe that Biden didn’t ask his son what he was doing when Hunter tagged along on an Air Force Two trip to China in 2013? When Hunter became a board member of Burisma in 2014, contemporaneous news reports suggested there was a conflict of interest, given his father’s position. Did Biden not read those pieces? Two Obama administration officials reportedly raised the ethical problems with Hunter’s dealings. But Joe never discussed this with anyone?

The Hunter Biden Cover-Up Is a Scandal
David Harsanyi / @davidharsanyi / September 24, 2021
https://www.dailysignal.com/2021/09/24/the-hunter-biden-cover-up-is-a-scandal​

On the selling access scandal, be that as it may, and may it turn out however it's going to turn out, the far more troubling and concerning threat is Big Tech's, and the lamestream political propaganda media's willingness to bury the story, to suppress it in fact, full well knowing that it would have an impact in the election results.

Poll: One In Six Biden Voters Would Have Changed Their Vote If They Had Known About Scandals Suppressed By Media
https://thefederalist.com/2020/11/24/poll-one-in-six-biden-voters-would-have-changed-their-vote-if-they-had-known-about-scandals-suppressed-by-media/

A new report from the Media Research Center shows that the media’s lack of coverage and big tech’s suppression of certain issues and scandals surrounding Democratic Presidential Nominee Joe Biden could have cost President Donald Trump the election.

The survey results report that 17 percent of Biden voters would not have voted for the Biden-Harris presidential ticket if they had known about at least one of the eight news stories that were suppressed by big tech and mainstream media outlets.​

In short, Big Tech, and the media, suppression the laptop story was overtly manipulating the electorate to achieve their desired election results. But that's not really anything new. Heck, some from the left have already crowed about it:

• “Every attempt to interfere with the proper outcome of the election was defeated,” says Ian Bassin, co-founder of Protect Democracy, a nonpartisan rule-of-law advocacy group. “But it’s massively important for the country to understand that it didn’t happen accidentally. The system didn’t work magically. Democracy is not self-executing.”
• a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information. They were not rigging the election; they were fortifying it. And they believe the public needs to understand the system’s fragility in order to ensure that democracy in America endures.
• change rules and laws before the election (to corrupt and pervert the election process?)
• steer media coverage? (and it is an illegal campaign contribution to that one party!)
• control the flow of information (an absolute abuse of power! As Twitter, FB, and AWS have so clearly demonstrated)

The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election
BY MOLLY BALL, FEBRUARY 4, 2021
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/​

Further:

‘Zuck Bucks!’ Zuckerberg-Funded Group ‘Swayed Election’ with Racial ‘Bribery’
Alexander Hall, March 2nd, 2022
https://newsbusters.org/blogs/free-...bucks-zuckerberg-funded-group-swayed-election ​

Talk about a real threat to the Republic and it's elections.

 

Excellent breakdown of the matter! Here's an item that should seal Joe's fate if it is verified.
https://nypost.com/2022/04/23/joe-biden-met-with-hunter-biden-business-partner-at-the-white-house/

How he can use "plausible deniability" if asked about this would be interesting to see. Of course none of the MSM will ask him.

 

That's all you really had to say instead of resorting to deflecting to past presidents.
This thread is about the current POTUS.

 

All of this Hunter Biden nonsense is whataboutism and revenge for four years of attempts to hold Trump to account.

 

Did you complain about it when the Democrats did it?

 

All of this 'four years of attempts to hold Trump to account', has shown itself to be little more than liberal / progressives / Democrats and their media political propaganda accomplices constantly attacking, trying to delegitimize and gaslight a legally and legitimately elected president and his administration, denigrating and damaging the institution, which, once again, those same liberal / progressives / Democrats accuse others of doing, yet being guilty themselves of what they accuse others. A pattern so often repeated it has been elevated to a truism, so reason enough to be skeptical of ever single word that comes out of their mouths.

 

Do you have anything to add besides trolling with a meme?

Are you not mad at Biden for straight up lying to you? The last 4 years you guys complain non-stop about lies and suddenly they're okay

 

A whataboutism is deflecting to Donald Trump as an attempt to get the reader not to talk about Biden in this thread.
Sorry, but that's not going to wash here...

 

If there was any doubt as to the depth and magnitude of your partisan blindness you just removed it.

 

Whatabout fallacy.

 

What do you think the chances of this happening are?

 

None obviously, but it will be moot in January when the investigation committee is created

 

Democrats did what? Tried to hold Trump to account? Republicans have been trying also. Trump abused his powers and was impeached twice for it, and both times Republicans also voted to impeach and convict.

 

Ok, now you're just showing you have TDS. Have a good day.

 

The only TDS is what Trump's cultists suffer from.

 

Shall we try that again?

Please note. This is a thread about Joe Biden.

 

No, this is a thread about TDS.