Its not irrelevant as you just proved. So were better off having China produce more things since they do it so much cleaner . This is whats happening now as manufacturing moves there from here. Your getting more pollution instead of less. Like always libs have good intentions but fail to see the unintended consequences
Want to see a real one? January-February 2015 Sees Fewest U.S. Tornadoes in Over a Decade http://http://www.weather.com/storms/tornado/news/tornado-drought-january-february-2015
I don't care about your personal opinion when the facts state the opposite. We can control what we put in the air, and when that stuff affects the weather... than it's a no brainer we got influence in that part. Quote where I wrote that. Since It probably still emits the most,.. rather irrelevant. - - - Updated - - - Since the US is probably still the biggest polluter: irrelevant.
http://www.weather.com/storms/hurricane/news/record-most-category-4-or-5-hurricanes-typhoons 2015 Could Set a New Record for Category 4 and 5 Hurricanes and Typhoons. Hows that for more extreme weather?
Look at the graph I posted it backs me up. Problem is you have no idea of what to do. We know not to put stuff like carbon monoxide into the air but CO2 is another matter. You don't know if its good or bad for us as you don't know if it getting warmer is good or bad for us. Can you explain why during the medieval warm period it was 4 degrees warmer than today yet everything didn't disappear under water in fact it was the best of times. So even though SCOTUS says its one you don't agree? I thought they were always right. No China is
' Look at what I posted, that the tornadoes we are having is going to break a record with the most extreme. I'm talking about more EXTREME weather. Not just weather in general that is included in your graph. apart that it's a greenhouse gas, causing an increase in temperature... And climate change, and especially the way it happens now, aint that great with more extreme weather. Because world wide it still was cooler than today. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Medieval_Warm_Period Temperatures in some regions matched or exceeded recent temperatures in these regions, but globally the Medieval Warm Period was cooler than recent global temperatures. Rather dumb to go ask what you can find and wikipedia yourself.
One year means nothing. IPCC IPCC http://http://dailysignal.com/2014/03/31/five-myths-extreme-weather-global-warming/ And using wiki as your source
Pfft! Coulda, woulda, shoulda. http://blog.oregonlive.com/myoregon/2015/06/climate_change_hoax.html Hoax. You tell me. Why would the banks support it?