the oldest BIBLICAL DEPICTION of yeshua..yes its that one. the ethiopians claim he was black thats why they wrote the book lol. they also have the ark of the covenant, the commandments. you still going to call ethiopians liars?
see, this is the problem today, racism. anything a black nation claims is immediately scoffed by whites ENTIRELY on the basis of their black skin. can you not just take somebodies word for it, its not like they have gone around the globe murdering and bombing every continent they walked on.
No, I'm calling you a liar. Inventing things on behalf of other people, and making up a bible that doesn't exist and that you keep refusing to even name, and then pretending that you're speaking on behalf of Ethiopians? Seriously, what kind of tactic is that?
where did ilie exactly. yes, its that one you mentioned. how many times do ihave to say lol. why do you accuse ethiopians of being liars and deceivers? where is their history of being a wicked nation exactly? you have no case to stand on other than they are guilty for having black skin?
ithough have proof of white european nations being wicked and deceitful all the while pretending jesus was a white man. this is common knowledge among historians and scholars.
lets not shoot the messenger. this is about black yeshua not esaus life. do you think you can handle it instead of deflecting or do ihave to take action?
if you want to talk about turkey then make a thread about it and send me the link. this topic is about white jesus and how white jewish and christian europeans have led the world to believe the messiah is a white man with blue eyes.
Lol, is that really how you think you "win" an argument, Esau? By making up me "accusing ethiopians of being liars" and other such ****? Lie enough and hope it sticks, eh? Never accused any Ethiopians of lying about anything. That you interpret making a religious image of Jesus to represent one of your own people as some sort of big, dastardly, "evil" and wicked deed, is entirely on you. I don't associate doing that with anything "deceptive". It was a historical norm throughout the world, everyone did it. It wasn't done by anyone to "decieve". Anyone with two brain cells to rub together, can read as much further up.
yes lots of white nations did it in an attempt to fool the world. they all copied the ethiopian book but changed the words to make it suit them. that doesnt make ethiopians liars, it makes the white nations who COPIED their idea liars. lets not try and twist the facts here.
are you serious? Of course they are. Obamas rabbi, capers funnye is a good example that shows you have no idea what you type.
What's important is what Jesus taught, not what he looked like. He would probably be somewhat flattered that people view him as looking like themselves by his doctrine. Though it wouldn't really matter. I myself find the anglicized prettyish image of Jesus to be somewhat embarrassing. (And I'm mostly white.) It is contradictory to the strength and depth of his gospel. As you suggest, he was most likely far rougher looking, maybe dark skinned? But who knows. What's important is that his throne is in the heavens, and the earth is his footstool. And we are fortunate he reigns and that there is no bias or deceit in him. And in the end, he will put all things in order. What a relief that will be. The very prospect is disarming.
Remember a few years back when that journalist, Megn Kelly, said Jesus and Santa Claus were both White. Did she ever apologize for that? She did apoligize for saying there was nothing wrong with wearing blackface as part of a Halloween costume.
I don't think he was black or white. I've seen some biblical sources that refer to his skin tone as "olive." Which makes sense to me, based upon the part of the world that he grew up in.
My Jesus was a Viking. I mean, of course not really, but for all the difference it makes, why not? XD
The question isn't, what do we want Jesus to look like. The question is, who does Jesus want us to be like.
The doctrines attributed to him are real. From my perspective, they are in alignment with conscience and the spirit of our youth.
Yes but what he looked like very important also when looking at the wider impact. Also with the help of some exhaustive research, a more accurate portrayal is being observed albeit not in the mainstream and one in stark contrast to europes imagination. The holy scripture is basically about the Battle between the Black Judaens and Europe. Looking in that context is it even conceivable for europeans to tell this history? How bad would it look and how devastating would it be for european civilization to have to show on tv every christmas the white romans and white greeks crucifying black folk?
