Black vs. White: Graduation Rates of Tourney Teams

It is a bull(*)(*)(*)(*) test that measures "college appitude" which claims to focus on "critical thinking." However, one can increase their own score by over 100 points across the board in all sections just by learning how to take the damn test. It doesn't prove much at all.

 

Nigerians come here as immigrants, and starting from the bottom, shoot right up the ladder in college, business, income, SAT scores and so forth even outpacing whites. Same with other minorities such as those from Asian countries. There's no bias in those tests

 

Were you ever told that stereotypes are bad? Stereotypes limit discussions to nary a few(biased) viewpoints and the discussion itself is invariably dead. Nevertheless, I'll address the stereotypes

-Black man buys a 20 inch rim sports car, he's a drug dealer or illegitimate

The drug trade's very popularized(it's also more dominated by Mexican Nationals, since you know they have access to it). But aside from that, gang dealings, etc are also factors and law enforcement continues to combat them. That doesn't mean that all or most, or even many blacks are 'illegitimate'.

But to argue that a certain segment of their population unfortunately doesn't feel like they're above the law, is an argument destined to fail. They don't "fall" through the cracks, nor are they racially oppressed. They simply go through the cracks willingly. What are we to do? Mind Control them?

I'd never judge a man by his automobile of choice(unless it's a junkie). No, clothing is far more telling(and if that's a crime, every CEO literally is guilty and puts emphasis on it to potential employees)

-White man shoots a person, he's mentally ill or the person deserved it.

For all we know, the prospective 'white man' may very well be mentally ill. This doesn't have anything to do with his race(and I believe you concur as a non-racist). It's a medical condition!(Albeit, a sick ass one that hopefully we get more and more on top on. We don't need more Holmes in the world).

And for all we know, self-defense is sometimes rightfully applied in certain situations. I know the big story was the TM Case(no need to revive that (*)(*)(*)(*)fest). But I concurred with the jury that there was little evidence to convict GZ of first-degree murder. At best, if I were the prosecutor I would've pursued manslaughter charges. But if, and only if TM engaged Zimmerman(and the jury believed there was enough evidence of the possibility) then even manslaughter becomes a very tough call.

That's why the jury deliberated as they did and came to that verdict. There was no clear-cut answer for them. If you believe Zimmerman should have his ass behind bars, blame the prosecution. That was pathetic, even with my amateurish knowledge of Law. Appealing to emotional fallacy in a court trial?('He's just a kid') REALLY?

That prosecutor should be fired by the State.

-Muslim shoots someone, he's a terrorist.

I'd wish it weren't so, but the vast majority of Muslims believe in Islam, and you know just yesterday my mom and I drove past an Islamic 'church' in Philadelphia, wanna know what it said?

'Only Allah is worthy of worship'. Yes, tolerant much! And as such, most(not all) of their crimes are religiously and therefore terror-based. To terrorize us into believing Islam. That said, I've already stated I'm the type of guy who judges on a case-by case basis.

It just so happens 9.5/10 times, the Muslim Culprit is motivated by 'Jihad' of some sort.

-Black man shoots someone he's a criminal.

Anyone of any race shooting someone without self-defense is guilty of a crime. Least of which is assault, given the weapon used, most likely at least "attempted murder". No race or class is sanctioned from this.


-White Woman wins Miss America Pagent, she's a real American Woman.

And this surprises you? The Liberal Manifesto won't bare its ripened fruits for another 20-40 years according to the Census. For now, we European-Americans still make up 80% of the voting bloc. And it's only through "White Guilt" that this is the ONLY voting bloc that doesn't and can't necessarily vote in its interests(whatever those may happen to be).

Like seriously, am I supposed to believe that it's racist that a European-American female is an American in a (for now) predominately European-English Country?

-Indian woman wins Miss America Pageant, she's a Muslim/Terrorist/Non-American.

First off, I won't apologize for the racists and morons, anyone with any geographic sense would know that India's an Eurasian continent and that the predominate religion in India(as in most Asian countries) is Buddhism. Couldn't be farther from the M.E trash. Secondly and partly from what I understand, she was a nationalized citizen correct?

I can see how some would take it as a slight that a foreign woman(of any decent) would be viewed as 'more beautiful' than the natural-born American Women. It wasn't all just racists, but also quite a few healthy skeptics. She certainly deserved the award(She was beautiful, not to my aesthetic taste as a male but beautiful nevertheless). I will admit: Had the polling been public(I'm not sure if it is or isn't, I don't watch the pageant, I just heard the outrage), then the award likely goes to someone else.

But that event in particular, wasn't as racist as people made it out to be. For some, it was a legitimate complaint(the voices would be lesser(and more obvious) if the winner had been an African-American woman.

-White woman buys name brand clothes / bags, she is treating herself.

-Black woman buys name brand clothes / bags, she is a welfare queen.

I disagree, white woman buys brand clothes/bags, she's treating herself.

Black woman buys brand clothes/bags, she's treating herself. This is no different than your sports car strawman and it's the same flawed reasoning.

Heck, orange crippled woman buys clothes/bags, she's treating herself.

If I get to see her kids, how she interacts, I could make a better judgment on whether she's the kind of parent to abuse welfare. But this is just me: I'd like to be of the honest belief that no parent would put themselves over their kid like that.

-White man dresses in hoodies with tattoos, he is "troubled"
-Black man dresses in hoodies with tattoos, he is a gangster / thug.

I now bring to your attention that "troubled" and "gangster/thug" are the same thing. I don't know about you, but I don't want to associate or find myself remotely near the Aryan Brotherhood(ROFL, how's that for a laugh? Despite being pro European-English culture, I'm not the supremacist some posters have tried falsely in the past to accuse me of).

But seriously, if someone's wearing shady clothing, walking at night with disposition I automatically tell myself 'walk away'. Least of all, to not associate with that person. I'll be the first to admit, there's no 'racism' in the hood. Hood rats exist everywhere.

And I avoid them all, equally.

-White man yells during an interview, he is passionate and patriotic.
-Black man yells during an interview, he "doesn't know how to act."

It depends A: On the context and B: On the type of interview.

If it's a political interview, I don't mind, especially if the person makes sense. Letting yourself be heard loud and clear is the first lesson in speech therapy.
If it's a formal interview, I do expect well-mannerism from all genders and all races. Oh, and being on topic is key as well.

Had I been Issa for example, I never would've apologized to Cummings. Issa gave him permission to ask a question, he goes on a rant. I would've simply said: "Mr. Cummings, we're here for business not partisanship. If you have a formal complaint, issue it to the committee outside of the meeting."

Politics is serious business and some Liberals don't think its like that. But there's nothing racial about holding ethical conversational standards.

 

Somebody did another Race Study. Probably at public expense.

I'm sure this study will be used as justification for at least another Billion Dollars is "Whites Not Allowed" government scholarships and another 10 years of AA.

Liberals are such freak en hypocrites and racists!