When there are lots of riots and protests, the Republican wins. While it is clear all this manufactured false narrative by Democrat politicians and the super-rich elitists press and media corporations to fire up blacks and Latinos as a get out the vote drive, they may not be able to contain it. If they cant maintain limiting control over the low intelligent mobs of bums and malcontents, this Trump V Clinton election is going to have the same outcome of Nixon versus McGovern. Historically, Democrat riots result in Republicans win elections. With BLM now even turning on and attacking white Democrats it appears their white Democrat masters and super-rich elitists propagandists have lost control of the monster they created via their propaganda machinery. Adding the ongoing Muslim terrorist attacks now combined with BLM terrorist attacks, it is clear that Trump will be the next president.
People may diss Trump to their friends and the public but when they are in that voting booth by themselves they know who will actually offer them more protection. I think Trump may actually blow Hillary out of the water.
I totally agree with the OP and Spooky. Trump has been an anti-establishment candidate since the beginning and dems have no clue how to counteract his strategy. In this election both parties have anti-establishment constituents. Because of this fact, the voter polling is completely inaccurate. In order to typically create an accurate poll, the polling company MUST estimate the total "population" of the election, meaning X-number of dems, X-number of republicans, and X-number of independents. In the recent past, typically, those numbers have been approximately 30-percent dems, 28-percent republicans, and 40-percent independents. HOWEVER, when party affiliation is not the determining factor of division, like establishment versus anti-establishment, then pollsters cannot properly estimate the total population of voters in Nov. When they cannot estimate the population of voters then they cannot create an accurate "sample population" in order to ask how they will vote in Nov. In other words, ignore the inaccurate polls. Steve
No, not ALL protesters. But if they are blocking a highway his words to the police would "get them out of here!"
This is what voters are seeing: When an American Muslim born to immigrant Muslim parents commits a terrorist act, it is Democrat politicians who want to bring more such Muslim immigrant parents here. If a group is burning an American flag, they are Democrats. If an American group is flying a Mexican flag, they are Democrats. If a group of protesters are blocking a road or highway, they are Democrats. If people are marching chanting for murdering police, they are Democrats. If someone murders police, Democrats make excuses for the murder. If there is a riot with arson and looting, they are Democrats. If a political rally is raided and attacked by protesters, they are Democrats. If someone is screaming insults and accusations at them as racists, the aggressors are Democrats. MOST people just want to live their lives, raise their families. They want to be society to be orderly and predictable. They want people not to threaten or endanger them. If the BML protests continue and with the certainty of more Muslim terrorists attacks around the world with Democrats making excuses for both, it will assure a Trump and Republican Congress victory.
56% of Americans believe Clinton should be indicted and the polls - as Democrat bias as most are - are now shifting to Trump.
Having a businessman handle Muslim terrorism, would be like having a businessman handle open heart surgery. Either way, how the businessman handles it will be a disaster. The day America dies is the day Trump is elected. Get ready to be Greece's sister.
If the inaccurate polls are shifting toward Trump, then I would hazard a guess that a landslide against Clinton is coming. I can even 'smell' the fear of democrats. Steve
