Blue State Blues: 9 Signs That Joe Biden Is a Third World Leader

Lol...more trump cult blues, eh?
The seditious orange dotard lost, and we are all very happy with his replacement.

 

breitbart.... lol

 

Well of course I have a high opinion of my opinion. My opinion is scientific in many ways since it is based on facts, observations and results of actions. If a person does not confidence in their own opinions why make them!

 

This was SPOT ON.

Anyone who is so misguided as to think otherwise, should consider investing some of their time into researching the MORON they put into office.

Great take and right on the money.

Biden is genuinely the worst president we have ever had and his administration has barely begun.

 

Its not any of those things.

Its based on lies, misrepresentations, and conspiracies.

How you could truly perceive it that way is astounding.

You thought Trump colluding with russia was based on facts, observations as well lol.

 

What is truly astounding is many parts of blue states resemble third world shitholes and the left continues to cheer it on. Why??? Because celebrities, professors, media pundits, and coffeehouse intellectuals say to do so. They have all fallen victim to the lie of multiculturalism, multigenderism, and antiwesternism. The positive emotions they get through their empathy are unfortunately more powerful than their rationality.

 

Very well put.

The left is overwhelmingly emotional thinkers, rather than rational thinkers.

Put an anecdote in front of them through the MSM, and you cant paint any picture you want.

You control how they feel, and therefore how they think.

 

You do not know Schiest aboutbwhat Insaid about Trump and Russia so do not talk crap.

"Conspiracies" ?? Go and find any post where Insupported QANON.

Do not accuse my posts of being "lies" or "misrepresentation". Since you made those false statements about me you are now obligated to bring in the proof to back up you false accusations.

Well what are you waiting for, get go work!m

 

It feels good to tell yourself you are the good guy and that you are for progress. But their idea of progress and what is good is the antithesis of Western Civilization. The destruction of God, the nuclear family, decency, order, self reliance, and most of all white men. Who do they think Watt, Edison, Beethoven, Goethe, Washington, Churchill, Eisenhower were? White men. A civilization and culture are the product of people, not just ideas, and there is a reason the West built the greatest Civilization ever.

 

I know exactly what you said about Trump and Russia, so I will continue to put out the truth.

I am not obligated to do anything. If you believe I violated a rule, then report me and I am sure the mods will deal with it accordingly. But I dont jump when you say so, nor am I incorrect about anything.

Your entire position about Trump and Russia was built by a conspiracy, without evidence, yet because it was such a mainstream narrative you thought evidence was everywhere.

Running from that wont change anything. Instead of denying and running away from it, face it and improve.

 

The right wing terrorists rampaging through our nations capitol trampling a 34 year old woman to death and killing one capitol cop is certainly more reminiscent of a third world banana republic than the USA.

 

The democrat supported terrorsits of BLM and antifa have been destroying cities and civilian businesses, burning people inside them, assaulting and in many cases killing anyone who disagrees with them.

Thats dems America.

 

You are so wrong. You are just making up Schiest about me tying the Trumpocity directly to collusion. Did not say you violated a rule.

I never said anything about conspiracy regarding Russia. You know that why are you posting such nonsense!

Just go watch the Helsinki show where The Trumpocity crawled ( figuratively in public) on bus knees in front of Putin and lied about our Intel agencies. No POTUS every crawled on his hands and knees in front of a foreign leader until the Trumpocity did that is Helsinki.
Total disgiust.

She Imnevervsaid colusion is you thing so then watch out for Delusion.

 

What. It hasn't even been two weeks. You're making stuff up.

A significant majority of domestic terror is from the right. The latest DHS warning was about the right wing groups.

 

His 2 weeks have been horrible lol so no I’m simply speaking truth.

incorrect, those numbers are largely based on long ago history. The vast majority of murder and destruction isn’t coming from the right wing in the last couple decades lol

 

That's your opinion. You don't like his politics. I do. As far as the economy is concerned we have to wait a year or two, although it's already projected to be better than Trump (one of the worst in history going by pure data).

My numbers are recent history. No point in lying man I always have the receipts,

Far-Right Groups Are Behind Most U.S. Terrorist Attacks, Report Finds - The New York Times (nytimes.com)
Homegrown Terrorists in 2018 Were Almost All Right-Wing - The Atlantic
DHS draft document: White supremacists are greatest terror threat - POLITICO
GAO-17-300, COUNTERING VIOLENT EXTREMISM: Actions Needed to Define Strategy and Assess Progress of Federal Efforts

The biggest threat is from the right according to the DHS and FBI. And studies.

 

It’s objectively true. The jobs he had lost for insurance . Him signing things he hasn’t read. It’s a train wreck.

Trumps was one of the best in history going by the pure data, until dems failed to control the virus in thier cities.

and going by pure statistics it’s objectively true that the right wing isn’t responsible for the majority of the death or destruction in recent decades. Thier Data is largely based on history that isn’t recent, as well as self admitted inconsistencies in how they label terrorist.

 

No it's not. You're giving your opinion and predictions. Please look that word up in the dictionary.

For example, me saying Trump is one of the worst jobs president's in history is objectively true. And here is the data to back up this objective fact,

Going by stats the right wing is a majority of domestic terror. That's what we were discussing. In fact DHS had to put out another alert, they are the biggest threat in US.

 

Correct

Please explain?

Does Inequality Cause Crime? - The Atlantic

(the above is a link)

"There’s a good amount of research from all over the world that suggests that places with pronounced income inequality are more likely to have high rates of violent crime, a finding that makes intuitive sense: the wider the socioeconomic gap, per Becker's 1968 model, the more gains potential criminals perceive. (Not to mention, the more frustrated poorer criminals will be with society."

Straw man? No one that I know of is advocating actual equality ("the sort of equality that would be proposed.....")

Systemic poverty need not "always exist", since there are sufficient resources to eliminate it.

As for "dysfunctional government", look at the existing model. with entrenched poverty and spiraling inequality.

The solution is implementation of an above-poverty Job Guarantee for the unemployed, achievable by abandoning the obsolete neoliberal, neo-Keynesian economic orthodoxy currently in vogue. (See MMT).

 

Regarding the levels of measurement, I mean that we can look at survey data in cities A thru Z, and run simple crosstabs to look at aggregate income and crime rates (we might find that populations commit more crime as median income decreases [Crime UP - Income DOWN]). At this point, we have recruited just two variables (income, crime) to assess aggregate inequality, but it matters how we apply the findings. It can be a mistake to apply these findings to individuals because this is an ecological fallacy (we conflate the individual and the aggregate of the identity group in which we place them - an example of this would be simple racism or sexism toward a person because they fall into an undesirable race/gender group).

We also have to go much further to find causation. "Does inequality cause crime?" At this point, we say that the variables are correlated (UP/DOWN in one correlates to UP/DOWN in another). But there is likely more to the question. So we get more variables and we put them in a correlation matrix and see that crime rate is also negatively correlated to education level. We might find the same relationship between age and crime rates. When all of these independent variables correlate to one another, this is called colinearity and it means that our model has a hard time attributing variation in our dependent variable (income) to a single factor (crime), because all of our independent variables are correlated to one another.

Imagine you walk outside your front door and step in a pile of dog crap. There are two identical twin dogs next door to you and so you look at your security camera footage and see that one of them did it. Which one did it? The more closely these dogs resemble one another, the harder it is to pick the one that crapped on your front porch. Such is the case when our IVs too-closely resemble on another in a correlation matrix. We might want to know if one dog has habit of getting on your lawn, or if one dog is trained and the other is not, etc. What about so many other factors, like party ID, education, internal efficacy, gender, age, etc? What is it about lower median incomes that causes higher crime rates? Or is it crime that precedes/causes income inequality? I think it is too simplistic to just analyze these variables. We might find that there are better models which factor-in education level, parental status, drug use, criminal records, and social media use to explain variation in income inequality, then the conversation changes.

As far as job guarantee, I don't know if you mean that we have a right to work. If we do, then it means government has a duty to provide jobs. I don't know enough about economics but I imagine this is impossible given that government cannot force all of our employers to hire a certain number of people to make it so that every person has a job.