Bombshell: Nunes Says There Was "Incidental Surveillance" Of Trump During Obama Administration

Looks like the POTUS gets to spy on his political opponents. This is shaping up to be another brilliant nuclear option.

 

Excellent point.

 

There ya go.

And lucky for you, ya got the next best thing.

 

Hillary was worse. That's why she lost. Get over it.

 

Fits the pattern now doesn't it? The fake wire tap story, the fake Nunes story, the fake claim about not knowing anyone who was involved with Russia, the diversion tactic from the tax returns, the fake story about 5 million illegals voting, the fake story about the amazing things we are finding out in Hawaii, the fake story about crowd numbers at the inauguration, the fake story about the thousands of Muslims cheering, and on and on. The pattern fits perfectly.

 

If the left wants to stipulate that any party that finds it has unwanted support from unsavory sources is identified with that group then
it must be noted that the American Communist Party, La Raza (as noted), the Muslim Brotherhood, the Nation of Islam, George Sorros and his Tides Foundation, ect. are all fervid supporters of the DNC.

 

Somebody is going to real jail. lulz

 

^^ Fake News ^^

It's too bad you are so political you can't see past your own nose to understand exactly what is happening here. This could very well be the biggest violation of civil liberties in the history of the United States. It was perpetrated by the highest position in the United States against his political opponents and an incoming Administration.

When this blows wide open, you should be embarrassed to be a Democrat. Maybe even to be an American. How pathetic.

 

And here is the nothing burger; http://www.msnbc.com/the-last-word/watch/swalwell-dems-demand-nunes-evidence-by-friday-905290307611

 

Trump has a loooooooooooooooong history of planting **** like this.

It's his second nature. It's how he Arts up his Deals.

 

Nunes to speak at 10:30am EST. This should be interesting.

 

Very. This is getting so good.

 

And you certainly won't be the one who will tell me because you can't explain what is going on yourself.

You know, you sound like the same old broken record from over eight years ago, when Republicans started this scandalous campaign against Obama, that until today, have never unearthed anything. All this fake smoke by the Right for years and you all are still batting zero. Remind me never to hire the Right to do my investigating for me.

When this blows wide open, you should be embarrassed to be a Democrat. Maybe even to be an American. How pathetic.[/QUOTE]
I understand. The truth is a tough thing to swallow. But in the end, you will find out what I and others are posting will conclude, that we were right. The pattern of guilt, corruption, and the deceptive maneuvers by this Trump crime organization is beginning to fall apart. Sadly, Trump is bringing a whole bunch of them down with him. Just look at how many there are already, who have fallen or have lost total credibility because of one person.

 

and I have a meeting starting.... post transcript if you find one please.... maybe I can cancel this thing.

 

No, sadly you don't. You just proved everything and to everyone what a political stooge people can be.

 

This is stupid. Nunes said the surveillance was legal. The problem is the unmasking of people that were recorded incidentally. Everyone should be asking how and why that happened.

 

Nunes laid down like a cheap whore!

 

Frankly, had democrats not done such a fine job of destroying Mitt Romney ... none of us would be suffering now. Maybe, just maybe ... the SCOTUS appointment, and a bit more bi-partisanship in congress, will preclude the need for a second term. Think about it. #NeverTrump = 4 more years. Biden 2020?

 

Do you recognize the implications of your argument?

** See post #1001.

 

Of course I do! It looks, on the surface, like trumps' teams civil liberties were infringed on. If that's the case people need to be brought to justice. And as much as I despised Obama as POTUS, I seriously doubt the corruption went that high up the chain (assuming it occurred at all).

 

I gave you what a lie is. Knowingly giving false information.
Being wrong, typically means, you thought you gave good information at the time.

As of now, there never has been nor has it come out, trump towers was wiretapped. At this point, that statement is a lie.

 

I have to agree. What we are witnessing is the disintegration of the public trust. When our bureaucrats believe in the sanctity of their mission over the liberty of our nation, we are faced with more than just the existential threat of the theoretical, but are being forced to recognize just how insidious the use of government power has become.

I'm probably less sure about the losership comment. I think that exposure ultimately allows us, the citizens to win out.

 

No he didn't and no it's not and you know it.

 

And your proof, not conjecture or speculation or supposition, that in Trumps case it was the former and not the latter is what exactly?

 

On Thursday, Nunes, whose committee is handling the investigation into President Donald Trump’s seemingly unsubstantiated wiretapping claims, said at the Capitol that he didn’t think there “was an actual tap of Trump Tower,” adding that if Mr. Trump’s claims were to be considered literally, then “clearly the president was wrong.”
​

The zealots of trumpery hear the above as substantiating their messiah's crackpot paranoid tweetantrumps.

How can one possibly reason with such folks?