Buffalo white supremacist Terrorist

Wow! A right winger guessing right. You should get a medal.

 

I didn't write...

The statement that it motivates "everyone". The only alternative would be that it motivates "nobody" ... clearly binary.

or

Confirming the above. Your position: either it motivates "everyone", or it motivates "nobody". If I claim that it motivated the shooter, then the BINARY conclusion is that it would motivate me because I am part of "everyone".

or

You could not have made it more explicitly clear as you do here that you are looking for a "binary causative metric". Even AFTER I said that "binary metric" don't exist.

BUT your statement:

Clearly indicates that you will cling to projection as your only excuse. Which makes this debate a complete waste of time.

Thanks for playing...

 

No. I'm saying that ONLY White Supremacists believe that Democrats (or "they" in the Tucker Carlson White Supremacist propaganda) are "replacing" anybody with anybody.

 

Really?? Out of the seven or so billion people on the face of this earth, you believe "ONLY White Supremacists believe that Democrats (or "they" in the Tucker Carlson White Supremacist propaganda) are "replacing" anybody with anybody." ?

 

The only alternative being “nobody” is your binary statement. I never claimed that. In fact in this thread I stated it (hate speech) is involved when responding to another member.

You are projecting.

Incorrect. I did not conclude it motivates you. I asked you if it did. More fallacy from you.
or

I have never stated or implied the causative metric in this case is binary. I’ve stated the opposite.

You are engaging in more strawman fallacy. And again demonstrating the issue is far too complex for you to address intellectually. Thanks.

Oh, I also appreciate you offering evidence this is not a waste of time by claiming it is and continuing to engage. Clearly your streams of fallacy are of some value to you or you would not continue to post them.

 

Absolutely. If blacks were the dominant ethnic group in the system, then everything would be reverse. But the dominant ethnic group are whites. So systemic racism is white only.

You seem concerned about the white supremacist terrorist's feelings. I couldn't care less what anybody did to him. NOBODY shot him and killed him, like he did these 10 innocent people.

Your post is insane...

After this point, I completely lose track of what the f... you're talking about. I somehow think that instead of "indite" you meant "indict" (?), so I'm guessing you're in some sort of "conspiracy theory" fantasy trip. So I'll leave you to yourself. Hope you enjoy yourself...

 

You agree.... then you don't grasp that the point about the kid's feelings comment is the mirror of the position being used to excuse black crime. I thought you were sharper than that, but maybe you didn't know black people commit crimes.That could be the basis of your confusion.

Then- you're lost?? Perhaps you were lost before you started reading.
The term "indite" was a typo; it did mean indict, hold accountable. Figured you were smart enough for that too, and you did choose to accept it rather than get further confused. Good for you.

 

Actually, it's math. Democrats need an overwhelming win among minorities to win national elections. Obama managed 93% of the Black vote in 2012. Hillary could only manage 88% in 2016. Biden, the candidate who stated that Blacks should not enjoy freedom to choose their candidate and also stated that he hated every minute being a subordinate to a Black man when he was VP opened the southern border in hopes of replacing Black votes he will be losing in 2024 by bungling his first term. Don't see how that reflects White Supremacy. No other reason for bungling a stable situation at the border, allowing Fentanyl and illegal voters to enter the country and distributing them around the country.

 

Oh... yeah I remember: "I was only ASKING if you still beat your wife", said the frog.

Very lame excuse, but it still deserves a chuckle. Only a very small one, though.

 

Please quote where I asked if you were “still motivated by hate speech to shoot people”.

Until you can supply that quote using the PF quote function all you have is more logical fallacy.

We are all laughing Golem. But not with you, at you. Thanks for the humor.

 

Talking about a shooter who killed 10 black people and put out a manifesto full of white supremacist conspiracy theory and declaring himself a Nazi and a fascist is meant to "excuse black crime"? And, of course, you DEMAND that nobody reports that, right? Is that why you made up your fantasy about me "indicting" all white people? So that I STOP talking about it? You might one day want to try a bit of reality. Who knows... you might even like it. Or is fear of "liking" reality the reason why you stay so far away from it?

Looks like you think much better of me than I think of you... Sorry I can't correspond. And your statement above only confirms my impression.

 

There was group, Journalist I think, that would coordinate talking points among the various outlets. And to be honest, Fox does the same other than they are the only outlet and they are coming from the other side, but it often still has the same feel of political propaganda. There are some Libertarian Law Professors that blog, that I find interesting. That's where I tend to go for my news feeds.

 

Do you seriously believe, at face value, that an 18 year old would write a 180-page manifesto using language that 18 year old's don't typically use (and of which hits on every single Democrat talking point about "right wing extremists") and drive 3.5 hours (at these gas prices, mind you) just to target a predominately black area that's nowhere near his locality?

All I'm going to say at this point is that this whole story does not pass the "smell test" as far as I am concerned... Something just seems to be "off" with regard to this story... FBI???

 

Not really.
I can see you don't recognize a joke either.

 

Huh? Why wouldn't I? He's going on a shooting spree, and you think he's concerned about gas prices?

This is a very weird post.

 

A joke? Joking about excusing black crime by massacring black people sounds like a pretty sick joke.

 

Bcause he's not "right wing" for one thing. He denounces capitalism and FOX News. His garbled and contradictory "manifesto" is jumbled gobbledegook[/quote]quote]

Funny thing is this "Replacement Theory" has its Genesis amongst Democrats years ago. Many were talking about the surge of hispanics becoming voters and naturally(?) signing on as Democrats. All Carlson and others are doing is digging up all those dreams of a "permanent Democratic majority". Nobody on the right coined that phrase - it's all LW mantra.

There are millions of those guns in private hands' as there are with many other versions and types of guns. Your opinion of how another American exercises his constitutional rights mean squat.

 

Sigh! Another one!
http://www.politicalforum.com/index...acist-terrorist.599750/page-6#post-1073452434

 

Thanks. That makes sense.

 

Sure. Go with that. A little self-delusion is usually harmless.

What absurd nonsense. You're arguing that the guy didn't say what he's documented as saying.

 

You missed again. the joke was on you....

 

Didn't you notice I just PROVED it? YOU made the claim that he was a left winger before doing any research. I did my research and proved you wrong. It's ALWAYS like that. I'm concerned about trying to get it right. Which I don't always accomplish, but I TRY. You don't care being shown WRONG again and again and again...

 

Is your link a joke? It takes us back to your other post , which is a joke. You have a very unhealthy thinking that you and only you knows what is and is going to be the "way things are"... Not only are you wrong, you are wrong 100% of the time.. You have not proved anything.

 

Did you just forget about 9/11 or are you deliberately ignoring it?

 

It's not "me and only me". EVERY informed person in this forum knows that the guy declared himself a right-winger. You just happen to be in the minority that doesn't do research and, for that reason, is always wrong. Read my sig!