Of course you did. Here, laugh some more: Americans should be free to choose anything that is legal. And most things should be legal - that is the American Way.
Law abiding black Americans living in DP ruled violent racist urban Hell Holes should be allowed to arm themselves. That has been obvious for decades.
That is just how the law works. Scofflaw politicians can outlaw anything, hence the 2nd amendment. In America very few things should be illegal. And the right be armed is a fundamental human right and should never be outlawed.
It would be nice if they could, however many who live in public housing are forbidden by the Housing Authority from owning or possessing firearms upon the properties of the housing authority. Technically, they can posses a firearm in their domicile, (no violation of a right), but legally have no way to get it there without risking eviction for a rule violation. Yet one more way to control firearm ownership by minorities and the poor.
Ok..... The entire 147,000 square mile state of Montana has less people in it than the 57 square mile area of Bronx NY. There's barely 1 million people in Montana if like 3 people get shot then the per capita is going to be high.... Alaska has a higher overall murder rate per capita than Michigan which has Detroit in it and California that has LA, Oakland, Sacramento, etc. That's because there is barely anybody living in Alaska.... You understand this concept right?
Yeah Alaska and Montana have a high gun death rate. You were happy to use them as examples....until I pointed out the truth
No they can't. Law abiding citizens are effectively banned through severe gun control laws from carrying concealed guns in all of America's DP ruled urban killing zones. You know, rather like the Black Codes in the Old South, but without the discriminatory language. Google: de-facto discrimination. Denying the obvious is not good for the credibility thingy.
No they are not. You have the right to bear arms in every city in America. That is a fact As long as it is legal.....remember? LOL
You are just wrong. As soon as the law permits Americans to carry concealed hand guns large numbers of Americans start carrying. Gun laws that make it very difficult to obtain a permit restrict the number of citizens carrying guns and encourage more crime. Constitutional carry is the best approach. More Guns = Less Crime.
Which does not prove that the availability of guns would have any impact on the death rate. Surely you know that.
Lives would be saved. When the law abiding are disarmed they are attacked maimed and killed in great numbers. Hardly a surprise. The answer is always the same violate more fundamental human rights. "The law applies in England and Wales The Director of Public Prosecutions in England and Wales, David Calvert-Smith, has said retrials should be possible in "exceptional cases". Mr Calvert-Smith was appearing before the Commons Home Affairs Select Committee to give evidence on proposals to change the so-called "double jeopardy" rule. This is the law in England and Wales which means a suspect cannot be tried twice for the same crime if he or she has been acquitted of an offence based on the same facts." BBC, " DPP queries 'double jeopardy' rule," 1/25/00. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1204449.stm
Yes, the Old South's "Black Codes" still oppress law abiding black Americans in our DP ruled Urban Killing Zones.
For the love of God man.... Are you honestly going to use that as a talking point? Do you understand how "per capita" works? There are only 4 houses in my small neighborhood. If I walked outside right now and punched my neighbor in the mouth who is currently grilling in his front yard that would make my little neighborhood have the same violent crime rate PER CAPITA as Compton California. That doesn't mean that my neighborhood is just as dangerous as Compton California...