It's looking like a 2 man race going forward and the contrast couldn't be more stark. Take a look at the top 2 candidates campaign contributors and you'll see just what the choices are. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Democrats are shocked to see President Obama treat Wall Street's top banks with respect and kindness. In order to predict his kindness (Obama's justice department has failed to prosecute the crimes that helped lead to the financial crisis of 2008 ) towards the top financial institutions it didn't take a crystal ball, all it took was a list of his top donors which included Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan and Citigroup. Applying this same logic to the GOP primary election Romney is the candidate that will likely be buddy-buddy with Wall Street. Mitt Romney's top ten is made up of Goldman Sachs, followed by Credit Suisse (Switzerland), Morgan Stanley, Barclays (UK), Bank of America and JP Morgan. In contrast Romney's co-frontrunner in Iowa, Ron Paul, has a top three donor list made up of the US Army, US Navy and US Airforce. Obviously Goldman Sachs and company donate heavily to Romney not because they like his stance on the social issues but because he will continue the rigged game of crony capitalism. The revolving door from Wall Street (particularly from Goldman Sachs) to the White House will remain open and Goldman and company will maintain not only their rigged game but their influence. The active duty military that make up Ron Paul's top donor list are attempting to send a signal to the American people that Ron Paul's foreign policy is the right choice. http://milwaukeestory.com/index.php...tributer-goldman-sachs-ron-pauls-us-army-346/
Yep, another banker-bought crony, just like Obama. Maybe democrats should take notice, since republicans celebrate the fact that the GOP establishment practices corrupt anti-free market corporatism.
It ends up going to companies like Solyndra after the president gets elected. If Romney gets elected, we'll have to come up with a cool name like Owebama for him.
Why dont you show a real comparison of supporters for Paul. In IOWA many of the young crowd that cheers for Paul is NOT even from Iowa and cant Vote. Just like stuffing the internet polls..DONE. This Bs about Money that supports Romney is just that. Money isn't all evil. But JUST LIKE OBAMA Paul demonizes that money support as the evil establishment because he cant get some. Just like Obama he would gladly take it if he could.. People who run banks and companies large and small endorse ROMNEY over Paul. For a reason..not so they can cheat and steal from the poor people but to be able to run a business without undue Federal interference. They have no faith in Paul but mainly because Paul's foreign policy sucks. A rational person wouldn't vote to commit suicide. Iran would surely test a President Paul within a year. You need to admit that ..and it should scare the crapola out of you.
I would compare supporters, but Romney doesn't have any. He's the ugly girl at last call. I'm shocked that you're still holding on to the delusion that Paul's support is a hoax. I suppose you'll have to come to grips with reality tomorrow. Heed Willard's advice at 0:16; "don't commit suicide". [ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9L9A1IMTQo"]"Mitt Romney" â A BLR Soundbite - YouTube[/ame]
Paul is playing a peanut in the shell game..moving non voters from one place to another. Its been shown that the kids in IOWA for Paul are NOT FROM IOWA and cannot vote in IOWA.. But any more than 10 % will be a huge Paul victory. That's all he got last time..
