Can I convince PF's resident truthers that American 77 hit the Pentagon?

I see the OCTA'S are getting desperate and worried that I have exposed the lies of that video the way one of them came on here so quickly after I exposed the lies of that video.hee hee.

 

Right here.
[video=youtube_share;nyKtNHPeKxg]http://youtu.be/nyKtNHPeKxg[/video]

 

Was I referring to your video?

 

very desperate I see.hahahahahahahahahahahaahahhaaaaa

 

He better find another job then instead of creating videos since he fails miserably to debunk anything and falls flat on his face and has to resort to lies to try and save face in defeat not being able to be mature enough to admit defeat in the process.

thank god there is an ignore list.It grows longer now.I dont debate with people who cant admit obvious defeat and have to post one lie after another to try and save face in defeat when cornered and cant refute anything.

 

hey, check it out.

hee hee

 

oh the irony.hee hee.such hypocrosy if there ever was any.Kinda like everything you listed in that propaganda B.S video is false and B.S as I exposed.

well you can tell your boss that you failed miserably in debunking that five minute video which is no surprise since you failed in the very beggining since day one when you got here with that blog that is full of old stuff that experts have debunked.

You and your boss are going to have to come up with something more new and much more clever, since you both failed miserably in that 15 minute video to debunk anything.nice try but miserable fail!!!!

 

Do the 'truthers' have anything substantial to add?

Hey Job, I addressed the Barry Jennings interview. Will you admit you were wrong?

 

It's good to try to answer every question, but these questions being discussed about the said video are about how the government did it. They're not about whether the government did it. The pictures released by the government of the craft that hit the Pentagon have already proved that the government did it. Here's a discussion on that.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html#post1061950663

Here's where a pro-official version posters slipped up and gave a lame explanation for the pictures and made it clear that he didn't even believe his own arguments.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-11.html#post1062370641

The other pro-official version posters are playing dumb about his slip-up so it's clear that they are less-than-objective to say the least. No viewer with an IQ over ninety is going to take them seriously.

The case is pretty much closed. The government did it.

Anyone who isn't a shill and sincerely maintains that the government didn't do it is in denial and should watch this video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mEGgAk1AbA4

 

lol.yeah you aint kidding.

 

Why do the resident 'truthers' keep changing the subject.

Try and focus, and let's address one issue at at time, shall we?

(hey 'Job - I showed you proof of Jennings denouncing the cult. Time to admit you were wrong.)

- - - Updated - - -

 

The inability of truthers to remain on the thread topic is fascinating. It's hilarious that you two gish gallop information off like we're new comers and have never read or debunked it before. I mean, who do you think we are? You really think you can write a post full of lies and expect any of it to stick? Goodness. As I have already said, I am the creator of the video refuting the '9/11; a conspiracy' video, and every single point I made is correct. Every point you two made in response, is wrong. It's as simple as that.

But to topic. I ask what additional evidence I would require to convince you (the 'truth'ers) the Pentagon was hit by AA77. You have suggested a couple, unknown to you (due to an inability to even view the blog) that the suggested 'evidence' was either;

(a). already covered on my blog, or
(b). based on fiction.

Because you have yet to suggest anything that does not fall into either category above, I therefore think this thread has served its purpose, and I have proven a point. There is no need for further, off topic posts. Take your conspiracy gish gallops to a knew thread.

 

well said,could not have said it better myself.you totally hit the nail right on the head ESPECIALLY in your last two sentences there for sure.


yeah those links you just posted for sure expose that the government did it also.well said.we got so many people here in this forum here just to slander the truth its unreal.

did you notice by chance all the lies that I listed exposing the lies that were exposed in that 15 minute video that made pathetic and miserable failed attempts without backing their claims up to expose anything by chance?

 

- - - Updated - - -

It's fascinating, isn't it?

 

How many times do you people need to be told that explosions do not always mean bombs or demolition charges?

Jennings said that the explosions did not sound like boiler explosions.
Boiler explosions sound like bombs.

FAIL.

 

What? A picture of a little Shiksa hoe? A little young don't you think?

LEFTY, yes. But YOU?

 

Jennings was threatened and subsequently died some time ago. (sorry...didn't mean to interrupt but, saw that little blurb and I can't take too much more of the hyperbole so...hope you forgive me).

 

It's quite alright. If these aren't the times that try mens souls, then we are getting awfully close to them.

Jennings probably "died of natural causes" the same way that Madam Palfrey "committed suicide".

That's what can happen to people who know to much.

How many people do you know wouldn't be able to "keep their mouth shut" under those conditions?

I would say that the threat of death would be enough for most people, don't you?

http://nstarzone.com/PALFREY.html

Don't try to convince all the Shirley Temples out there on the Good Ship Lolly Pop that such things ever happen.

This ought to give the naive a hint as to how these information wars are fought.

The Hasabarats aren't saying.

 

Here's an important video in case there are still a few people who haven't seen it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bvay28lZiHU

 

This video at the top of your list is a lame attempt by professional sophists to obfuscate the proof that the craft that hit the Pentagon was too small to be a 757.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0f6t4dMtc00

I dealt with this issue on pages one and two of this thread.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/275987-few-debunking-links.html

The main flaw in the video is that, if there were a 757 where they say there is one in this picture,...
http://www.g7welcomingcommittee.com/blog/wp-content/images/pentagon1_plane.jpg

...it would be blocking the trees in the background. Also, the shadow of the 757 would be visible on the ground below the 757. The distance of the shadow behind the craft would be consistent with the shadow of the Pentagon. The shadow of the nose of the 757 would be visible on the ground.

One of the pro-official version posters on this forum was trying to obfuscate this anomaly and made a very clear slip-up which can be seen in this link.
http://www.politicalforum.com/9-11/290910-do-you-trust-us-government-11.html#post1062370641

If there were a 757 where that video says there is, there would be no need to try to obfuscate anything. That poster discredited himself with that slip-up and the rest of the pro-official version posters are playing dumb about that slip-up so that doesn't make them look very credible either. The pro-official version posters here don't even seem to believe their own arguments.

 

Here's a relevant link.

therightbloggerbastard.blogspot.co.nz

 

exactly.yeah sure Jennings died the way they said he did. the same way Paltrey died the way they said she did.they both died EXACTLY the way the government said they did even though many 9/11 witnesses have died mysteriously after initially telling about hearing explosions going off.

and Paltry just decided to change her mind and decide to take her life after all after going on Jones show saying she would NEVER take her own life.

and none of those hundreds of people in dealy plaza in dallas on nov 22nd 1963 died mysteriously later on after coming forward and giving evidence to authoritys that did not go along with the official version of the governments either,they died exactly the way the government said they did. they dont speak of foul play one bit at all.


Nor did Bill " I never had sex with that woman" not burn several innocent women and children in the waco tragedy.He was telling the truth when he gave a speech to the american people saying-we did not start the fire.the davidians started the fire by accident.we did not start it."even though photos taken by photographer that day show a tank with a flame thrower mounted on it shooting fire onto the compound.those pics are just fake right? hee hee

and Clinton also told the truth as well saying-"We never fired onto the compound,the davidians fired at us but we never fired back" even though films were taken with a gunner mounted on the helicoper showing him shooting at the compound with .a machine gun.hee hee.

No lets believe everything Clinton says about waco,.that the FBI and ATF were courageous and did a great job and Clinton is telling the truth and the survivors were all lying when they said they came out and said -dont shoot. and the FBI AND AFT shot and killed many of them.they are all lying and Clinton and his cronys in the FBI AND ATF are all telling the truth and innocent even though janet reno said in time and newsweek magazine then that Clinton gave her the okay to burn down the compound which Clinton says they did not start.


nor is our great government covering up these days of people Clinton was highly connected to nor did Clinton have anything to do with them even though there has never been a real investigation into it..lol.

http://whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/BODIES.html

 

Enlighten us. How did the government say Jennings died?
Provide a source, please.

 

and as always,someone here has NOTHING to counter any of those facts I just posted and can only whine and cry in defeat.