so someone born with both genitalia doesn't exist - not everything is as simple as you think it is, it's that gene thingy
And tried to mitigate it by posting links to Christians, who should face the most serious punishments, abusing a child, what was the purpose of doing so? Do you believe there is no such thing as a "real girl" and that that should be taught to 1st graders?
Republicans not to happy with vouchers it seems - lol ""Vouchers can be used for Muslim Schools? OOPS!"" https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2012/7/6/1106793/--Vouchers-can-be-used-for-Muslim-Schools-OOPS
you mean a teacher burning a Cross symbol into a children arm or a preacher punching a child in the face of course those Christians should be punished harsher, the Christian in the article should just be fired why do you keep trying to act like I think that, I made it clear in almost every post that I do not approve, yet you continue on as if I did... that is very dishonest
No nothing wrong except when nature gets it wrong in that rare exception and genetic testing is done to determine if the child is male or female and appropriate treatment is given. You really think this exceptionally rare genetic mistake justifies what this teacher did.......how absurd.
Why did you feel a need to engage in a whataboutis to try and mitigate what the teacher in the OP did?
I was giving other examples, saying this teacher and others need to be fired, sad you can't say the others were also bad and should be fired
why do you say those babies are wrong, they exist therefor they also count, you may not want to count them, but they still count
we don't support our tax dollar going to promote either religion http://rationalrevolution.net/articles/history_of_the_separation_of_chu.htm "When a religion is good, I conceive it will support itself; and when it does not support itself, and God does not take care to support it so that its professors are obliged to call for help of the civil power, 'tis a sign, I apprehend, of its being a bad one. - Benjamin Franklin: in letter to Richard Price, October 9, 1780"