Capitalism, A Worker's Best Friend?

There is no unemployment because the unemployed have to die.

 

This is extraordinarily naive. Not even orthodox economics accepts that. Indeed, given an inability to understand unemployment data, they had to steal from Marxist theory. There are non Marxist alternatives mind you, such as evolutionary economics and it's rejection of singular equilibrium.

 

actually dear Friedman accepted it 100%

 

Friedman stole from Marx? I'm sure your libcommie mentors would love for you to believe that utter nonsense.

 

has nothing to do with supply and demand

 

It's not possible to understand unemployment trends with a single equilibrium. It's one reason why the NRU was a crock of textbook s....

 

If I disagreed I'll pay the liberal $10,000. Bet??

 

Happy for you to pay a liberal 10 grand. Multiple equilibria is accepted with hysteresis and an understanding of how unemployment destroys human capital.

 

so?? IF I disagree I"ll pay you $10,000. BEt??

 

Your foot stamping won't change anything. Multiple equilibria has to be accepted as there is no means to understand unemployment trends with single equilibrium naivety.

 

Capitalism is always wonderful when one has enough capital.

Full employment of resources in the market for labor can ensure capital circulates, regardless.

Liquidity is what we need.

 

Generally speaking foreign immigration is utilized in destabilizing wages and bringing them down. It's the same for job outsourcing to other nations also.

 

What do you do when liberals and conservatives work together in undermining the working class in tantamount?

 

Wrong, many libertarian capitalists discuss often how we should go back to the good old days where minimum wages don't exist at all.

 

Unregulated or unrestrained capitalism could only exist in total lawlessness of anarchy, only crazy people support such a position.

Interesting enough with today's unregulated and unrestrained capitalist proponents politically it is no coincidence that our nations presently are descending into chaos or anarchy.

 

What's wrong with massive amounts of wealth inequality? A nation state divided amongst itself is doomed to failure.

 

A worker who doesn't perform as intended deserves to be fired. You've got a job. DO IT! If you don't, can't, or won't, you don't deserve the job.

 

When the dollar dies as the world reserve currency all you slum landlords and business owners will get your just deserts, good luck!

 

True. Thatcherism, ironically like the autonomist anarchists, realised how globalism is used to reduce the power of the workers and reinforce worker exploitation. However, there is no reason that you can't twin an open door policy with a rejection of neoliberalism (and therefore high levels of union power, a living wage and increased application of worker ownership)

 

Agreed.

 

Had to reread that again, I hope when you say open door policy you don't mean open unregulated immigration without borders because that's something I'm very much against as a nationalist.

Appreciate your clarity on that point.

I of course support a living wage, trade unions, and increased application of worker ownership, no argument from me there.

 

Lets go old school. Nationalism is the virtue of the vicious.

 

Nationalism doesn't have to be vicious or even imperialistic.

I prefer a world of independent nations that cooperate, trade, aide, and communicate with each other. I will not however tolerate or support a one world initiative ruled by a singular government entity.

 

Close.
Capitalism is great for the whole community as long as lawmakers don't make laws to protect the largest owners of production.
And THAT is what we have today.
And it is called Corporatism.
Corporatism is the enemy of the left and the right, it is what will eventually lead to mass economic servitude resembling the old Lordship. We are getting closer all the time.

 

Actually corporatism is a hallmark of capitalism, it's baked into it as a part of the ingredients.