Capitol Police test substance in suspicious package delivered to Ilhan Omar with 'patriarchy' threat

Again. I sourced you wrong in post 19, and you can't even bother to look at it and see that it's a podcast made by guys being pride about their patriarchy theme. It's part of their role that God gave to them to be. And no, I'm not going to cite from a podcast. In this big bad mean world, you need to be able to do some things on your own, like listen to a podcast.... if you care to be bothered.

 

Definitely Maga country and some nooses. Is this how she attempts to gain sympathy for being an antisemitic, anti-American POS?

 

sounds like a joker to me, have not heard any patriarchy nonsense in years

just someone trying to be funny I guess

 

So, there is no such action as "I sourced you wrong". I did point that out in the previous response. You could say, I provided a source that substantiates a position that is different than your comment. You could say, A source I provided indicated there are examples of, or many other options. But, "I sourced your wrong" isn't remotely correct usage of the english language.

The truth in the public world is that when the patriarchy is discussed, it is in support of the radical feminist narrative. Likely it didn't occur to you that these folks you referenced were in fact supporting it. From the description you've provided, it occurs to me that perhaps your podcast was simply gaslighting. I suppose that also didn't occur to you.

 

You should be writing English with a capital E. And I will regard as a personal attack for the sake to avoid admitting you are wrong.

You admitted previously that your opinion is based on your personal experiences with friends, and used that basically utterly biased opinion to claim that this is it. And I put up a source that it aint so. And no... they do not occur with your idea's. They support what the bible has taught them and that is a male dominated society. It even starts with a warning that their podcast is only meant for men. The text beneath it reads that it's about "public preaching, and humility before men"

You go tell me who needs to show humility before men, if it's not the women.

 

Impossible to know who sent this, and their rationale. That said, the idea that feminists, "radical" or not, would terrorize one of their own, should seem very far-fetched, to anyone remotely cognizant of the world in which we live. While none of your male-chauvinist friends has, in your hearing, used that term, this is certainly an extremely weak proof that some misogynistic guy, somewhere, could not have used a dictionary, or the internet, to find it. If you were to examine the possibilities in the same way as you recommend to @notme , you would almost be bound to consider the possibility that such a person or group-- even if they had no association with this term (which the podcast, offered by notme, shows it might be overly presumptive of us to assume)-- not wanting to give any clues to aid police in linking the package to themself, might have purposely found a word that they would not customarily use, which they had perhaps heard feminists using, to refer to this idea which they support; though, personally, "patriarchy," w/ it's 4 syllables, seems the most efficient and natural-sounding way to refer to the idea of male-dominated society (which has 9 syllables). What other terms do your friends and acquaintances use, instead?