College Republican says he got violent threats after he asked Muslim group to condemn terror attacks

What I garnered from the OP:

Some emotionally needy overweight college kid (who has probably never kissed a girl in his life) makes up a completely fabricated (and totally uncorroborated) story to get his name mentioned on social media.

Somebody should tell the poor kid about girls.

 

It seems that leftists are becoming increasingly less literate and articulate. The educational system has done a great deal of harm in dumbing down students in order to promote Leftism, and we see the consequences of that today.

The brief comment "your college republican is a dick" encapsulates the ignorance found among many former students who have recently left the education system, and many will need a few years in the real world to recognize just how profound their ignorance is.

 

Yeah but the guy is still a dick

 

There is a qualitative difference between a group that has recently entered the country to steal technology and power from our educational institutions and people and families that have been here for generations. To not understand this difference is pretty lame.

 

Soooooo asking me to re read it for comprehension was pretty much meaningless. Just a way for you to respond to my question without answering it. I think your reluctance to answer reveals your likely answer.

 

yeah I figured it would probably be meaningless

 

The family Trump hasn't been American for generations. His mother wasn't even born American. His wife wasn't either.
The only lame thing is your claim.

 

They're all American citizens, and none of them seem to have ever drained our coffers by seeking welfare. How many of those students are collecting American scholarship money?

 

Mohammad, his actions and his words, trump any law he didn't make.

The "no compulsion in religion" applies to those who will be subject to that
"religion of peace". Otherwise they can behave as their esteemed prophet and
supreme example and force conversion.

 

Negative. You're just making it all up that the Quran says one thing, and Mohammad something else.

 

No surprise when they can't tell the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

 

That's a meccan verse, abrogated by later medinan verses

[9.5] So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Basically convert or die.

Dr. al-Buti “The Jurisprudence of Muhammad’s Biography”

(p. 287) "It may be said, 'What is the value of a faith in Islam which is a result of a threat? Abu Sufyan, one moment ago, was not a believer, then he believed after he was threatened by death.' We say to those who question: 'What is required of an infidel or the one who confuses other gods with God, is to have his tongue surrender to the religion of God and to subdue himself to the prophethood of Muhammad. But his heart felt faith is not required at the beginning. It will come later."

 

The bolded part has shown to be true. Often the just the threat of death can convince people to believe and rationalize those beliefs.

Stepping back from Islam we see nothing positive about it whatsoever, quite the opposite. Yet people will still try to defend it and call any criticism "Islamophobia" as though the flaw doesn't lie with the religion but with the observer.

 

My verse is sourced that it's from the Quran.

 

Here's more:

https://www.thecollegefix.com/post/25638/



ACTIVISM FREE SPEECH

Muslim Student Association demands all ‘Islamophobic speech’ be punished

ALEC DENT - UNC CHAPEL HILL •DECEMBER 28, 2015


The Muslim Student Association at San Diego State University is demanding that administrators combat Islamophobia by developing a “zero tolerance policy explicitly for Islamophobic speech and actions.”


The demands, modeled after similar ones issued by black student associations at campuses across the nation, were lodged after a female Muslim student was allegedly attacked by a white man in a campus parking lot on the afternoon of Nov. 19, about a week after the Paris terrorist attacks, which killed 130 people.


At SDSU, despite reports that several witnesses stood by and did nothing as the attacker grabbed the woman’s hijab, as well as a police sketch of the alleged attacker, a police investigation could not identify a suspect, according to the San Diego Union Tribune.


Meanwhile, the female student who said she was attacked has not been identified. But she told Hanif Mohebi, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations-San Diego, that her attacker grabber her from “behind,” called her a terrorist, “choked her with the hajib” and told her to “get out of this country,” the Union Tribune reports.


Several comments on the article expressed incredulity over the attack, questioning whether it is a hate-crime hoax.


Yet less than a week after the alleged hate crime, SDSU’s Muslim Student Association held a protest against Islamophobia on campus that attracted hundreds of students.


Yasser Kaziha, a member of the Muslim Student Association, said that he personally knew the victim of the attack, and “when the attack on our Muslim sister happened here at SDSU, she felt alone after bystanders and witnesses who watched the attack did nothing,” he told the Union Tribune.


At the rally, the Muslim Student Association issued its list of demands, which members claim will help prevent future acts of bigotry against the Muslim community.


They demanded that the university adopt a zero-tolerance policy toward “Islamophobic speech,” mandatory bystander training, develop more courses on Islam, and increase funding for The Center for Intercultural Relations. Moreover, they demanded that “the SDSU administration address, alleviate, and eliminate systems of oppression that disproportionately target students of color, womyn, and all marginalized students on campus.”


Beth Chee, a representative for the university, told The College Fix in an email that the university has not issued a formal response to the demands, but members of the administration have reviewed the list and are currently “meeting internally and with the students to discuss their concerns.”


The Muslim Student Association could not be reached for comment.


Elliot Hirsham, president of the university, issued a statement on the attack: “We unequivocally condemn all forms of bigotry and any efforts to intimidate, harm or demean any members of our community.”


But the Muslim Student Association has been criticized by some Jewish peers for rejecting the support of SDSU’s “Students Supporting Israel.”


One of the Muslim Student Association’s demands called on students to “create a more inclusive campus climate by promoting tolerance and acceptance between different cultures and religions.”


Yet the MSA rejected SDSU’s “Students Supporting Israel” support, writes SDSU student Anthony Berteaux, vice president of public relations for Students Supporting Israel, in The Jerusalem Post.


“When asked why SSI was excluded from the statement, the response was simple and damning: ‘It didn’t serve the interests of the community,'” Berteaux wrote. “A rally that was supposed to serve as a unified solidarity march against hate became politicized and divided.”


Like The College Fix on Facebook / Follow us on Twitter


IMAGE: Shutterstock

 

Both Meccan and Medinan verses are ALL from the Quran, sooooo not sure of your point.

[2.106] Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things?

 

Well, to treat everyone equal they should probably also ban Christianphobic and Jewishphobic speech, which would include a ban on the Koran, full of such speech

 

My point is that Islamic law prohibits forced conversion. I sourced it.

 

Which Islamic law, stated when and by whom? Usually more credence is given to Mohammed's later statements, in Medina, when he was busy being a bloodthirsty warlord.

There are different sects and texts but they have all been polluted by the things Mohammed actually did.

 

^ Thread win.

 

What the fake assed little free speech gimps nazi salutin' all over the joint really want:

https://theintercept.com/2017/09/11...ll-create-pedestal-for-conservative-movement/

 

My verse from the Koran is also sourced-

[9.5] So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush, then if they repent and keep up prayer and pay the poor-rate, leave their way free to them; surely Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.

Convert or die, which most people would consider compulsion. And the other verse I provided was also from the Koran

[2.106] Whatever communications We abrogate or cause to be forgotten, We bring one better than it or like it. Do you not know that Allah has power over all things?

Your older verse has been abrogated by the later verse that DIRECTLY contradicts it. I even provided interpretations of a Muslim scholar confirming it is acceptable to threaten a non believer with DEATH to gain a conversion. Just as many old testament bible verses are abrogated by conflicting New Testament verses, older Meccan verses are Abrogated by newer Medinan verses.

 

It does not specify to which God they keep up praying in order for Allah to forgive.

This doesn't mean anything.

 

I sourced it

 

Muslims repeatedly claim that only their greatest scholars can accurately determine the intent of portions of the Koran.
Are you a great scholar, slumming amongst us?