Conservatives Upset ‘The Good Fight’ Wants You To Punch Nazis

I won't condemn them for thinking or speaking, but if and when things go beyond (and outside the realm of self defense), then yes, I can condemn that.

So who in here is defending nazis?

 

Who are you referring to?

 

I'm not talking about free speech. I'm talking about whether Nazi, Richard Spencer, etc...are complete and utter piles of crap.

Do you think they are? Yes or no?

 

Why won't you condemn them?

What about Osama Bin Laden?

You wouldn't condemn him for thinking the way he did?

 

My guess is that explains why some have such a hard time saying that Nazis are complete morons and utter piles of crap.

 

Any of them. After Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Castro, Che, Pol Pot, Kim, Chavez, and Maduro, anybody of voting age who still supports any form of collectivism, let alone, communism, can not be considered sane, rational, or human. The history of the collective soul is drenched in human blood. Its victims' screams echo unto eternity.

After Ayn Rand's, We the Living, the con game is over.

 

Nazi = my grandma, because she watches Fox News.

 

Okay, well nobody does.

So back to Nazis, Neo Nazis, White Supremacists, etc....total scumbags.

 

It's all about what a person does. I don't feel the need to get a social justice boner and start reee-ing because there's people who think differently than I do, especially when those people don't pose a threat to me.

But you can, that's fine. You can be one of those who simultaneously warns people about the threat of white nationalists while supporting things that agitate and motivate them.

 

And then Ayn Rand conned herself

 

I have no idea who Richard Spencer is. Doesn't sound like I want to know him. However, it does not matter whether they are POS or not. that give nobody that right to violently attack them. I'm just making the point that protecting Free Speech is not equivalent to protecting Nazi, Spencer, or anybody else. It is protecting Free Speech....not the speech itself.

 

Nobody does what? Support collectivism? Support socialism? Or considers those that do, sane?

Nazis = Six Million dead.
Stalin = Thirty plus million dead
Mao = the Guinness Book of World Records' most deadly mass murderer with sixty million plus slaughtered.

So, as far as Nazi's and white supremacists are concerned, you're spot on...but they are amateurs compared to the Socialists.

 

So you don't condemn Osama Bin Laden.

Wow.

And people were/are going on about Omar.

 

Nobody supports Stalin or Mao or any of them. So that's enough of that as it's off-topic. I was just wondering who you were referring to specifically. You told me. The end.

So back to neo Nazis and White Supremacists and the alt right, etc. Horrible pea brains.

 

Yeah, I get it.

You'd think that people would be going on about protecting the free speech of the TV show...not disgusting anti-American Nazis.

 

Inane deflection is inane.

 

I would certainly call Nazi's morons and piles of crap. I would call White Supremacists juvenile fools.

What name would you use for anyone who tries to claim someone is both, without any justifiable cause or reason?

 

You're telling me.

I've never seen so much deflection over something you'd think would be easy.

 

This country has a proud history of harming nazi's.

 

No, you apparently do not get it.

I am not advocating violence against the TV station and speech that incites violence or panic is not free speech nor is it protected. If an alt-right or Nazi was inciting violence, I would not feel it is ok either but I would not attack them.

 

Duplicate

 

I get it.

Not sure you do.

 

Yeah, those evil right-wingers with their hate. They remind me a lot of AOC, Ilhan Omar, Obama, Pelosi, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on...including some I work with...they are just the flip side of the tyranny coin...but I still don't get to hit them, do I?

You keep asserting this board is about evil right-wingers. It's not. It's about: does a person have the right to assault those they disagree with. I, in the strongest terms possible, with full conviction and knowledge of what I say, and in the name of all dissidents, state unequivocally: absolutely, positively, without question, no, not ever, not for any reason, not at any time, not at any place. Get it? Got it? Good.

And with a tip of the hat to my intellectual heroine, Ayn Rand: "Whatever may be open to disagreement, there is one act of evil that may not, the act that no man may commit against others and no man may sanction or forgive. So long as men desire to live together, no man may initiate—do you hear me? no man may start—the use of physical force against others." http://aynrandlexicon.com/lexicon/physical_force.html

And may I add, that includes those parasitical, blood-sucking, hateful wretched creatures who preach "One man's tears is a claim on another man's life".

 

Very rarely have I seen a leftist able to carry a bag of groceries, let alone get into an actual fist fight with someone.

 

Have you seen ANTIFA?