Crazy Stuff White People Riot Over

I don't know about your planet Wingnutia, but fabricating and falsely attributing other peoples quotes is frowned upon here on Earth and message boards. That was my quote to you-- not Smartmouthwoman.

But thanks, it does help to explain your edits to misinterpret the truth.

 

The misquote was unintentional, the result of trying to respond to two posts at the same time.

Still, the only proof offered that Obama sponsored the riots are screenshots of Obama juxtaposed with rioting, quote mining a third-hand account of Obama meeting with national leaders, and a partisan editorial that happens to mention Obama. That may constitute proof on planet Wingnutia, but it doesn't even come close here in the real world.

 

It's not a riot.

 

because cops have been mistreating citizens of their city... simple, they reached a boiling point

 

Sure it was. I've never seen anyone else be so careless, unintentionally that is. I mean its not like it would require a lot of extra cut and pasting on your part...

Like I said, it explains a lot about you and your poor relationship with the truth.

 

This from the person who thinks telling someone to do all they can to keep the peace is an innuendo for sponsoring riots. Right.

 

Please post evidence of Ferguson cops systemically mistreating citizens on a scale that would justify civil uprising.

 

The "Disparity Index" measures the likelihood drivers of a given race or ethnic group are stopped based on their proportion of the residential population age 16 and over. Values greater than 1 indicate over-representation and values less that 1 indicate under-representation in traffic stops.

Local Results - Ferguson Police Dept.

http://ago.mo.gov/VehicleStops/Reports.php?lea=161

 

Thats it? They riot because they are stopped more often? Since they commit vastly more crime its hardly surprising

 

nothing justifies the looters, they are just taking advantage of the valid issues the protestors are trying to be heard about

the protestors have justifiable reasons to protest, the looters have none


.

 

lol, clearly progressives are having a hard time with the ongoing black riots across the country, and their continuing disproportionally high crime rate. As expected, they have chosen deflection onto the only racial group that is OK for them to bash according to the laws of political correctness and social Marxism - white people.

 

The only real difference between the IRA and the UK government is that the UK is in power. Of course the UK doesn't need to use force to change the status quo - they want the status quo!

This notion that states don't operate on force is ridiculous.

 

That's definitely a reason to dig deeper. +.4 is not alarming in and of itself, but requires a closer look. One problem I see with your chart is it is using the census information of Ferguson for demographics as comparison to ALL traffic stops. The Ferguson jurisdiction includes a long stretch of hwy 270, that is patrolled heavily by Ferguson police. So the small disparity in your graph may be accounted for by additional stops of non-Fergusonites along the 270 corridor.

Even so, while it is indicative of a possible problem, I do not see this, in and of itself, as justification for armed uprising against oppressive government. I see it, at worst, as reason to toss the police chief next election.

 

I agree there is no justification for looting. And I concede the protesters are OK in in their protesting, simply because they need NO justification to protest as long as they do it peaceably.

You inferred that there was abuse by the police that justified the protests. Please post evidence of this abuse.

 

This from a person who severely parses the meaning out and the intention of quotes and fabricates quotes of board members. You have a lot of acculturating to do if plan on staying here on Earth

 

It's a crime.

 

You said it was a riot. It's not a riot.

 

Had the cops and feds turned their weapons on them like they do with liberal protesters such as Chicago, 1968 or Kent State it would be called a "riot".

 

True, nothing justifies the looting or the looters and protesters have a right to protest, but it's a stretch to say that the protestors are justified in their protest over false rumors of Brown's innocence.

 

then why are the vast majority of rioters being arrested out-of-towners, instead of locals?

 

Yeah, what childish, ignorant, whiny-assed liberals do when they are overcome with their emotions and feelings know no racial boundaries.

 

Yeah, like scores in soccer or basketball games. The white rioters trashed our 'old town' area the last time the university won a national basketball championship. But it all comes from a sense of entitlement those rich white frat boys have. I can visualize George Bush throwing a burning trash bin through a storefront window.

 

people taking advantage of the situation.... the townspeople have a valid reason to protest, I do not support the looters and rioters, in town or out of town

- - - Updated - - -

the protestors are protesting about whats been going on in their town, not specifically this case.... though I agree this case turned out to be a bad one to chose as the one to set them off, but it is what it is.... the people are finally being heard, time for change

 

the city is 65% black and the mayor was re-elected unopposed with 12% turnout. if this has been an on-going problem, the people have no one to blame but themselves.

 

don't disagree with you there, they need to get out and vote