I didn't think you knew. Thanks for the confirmation. Even though you've admitted throughout the thread you don't know.
Since I cannot respond directly to MAGA's post I thought I would drop in this link for anyone interested in the science of foetal development https://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/embryology/index.php/Fetal_Development#Fetal_Neural
And how would you teach someone the finer philosophical points of reproduction by stopping the reproductive process? Killing is the opposite of reproduction.
Reading your post more carefully this time: What physiological knowledge about a child's development suggests that unborn children are not living humans? None. The lack of brain activity does not suggest the child is not alive. It suggests that the child is not conscious. Adults that have no brain activity are only pronounced dead when there is no rational hope of brain activity starting. Ironically, many pro-life people would look closely at a "Life Amendment" that said humans with brain waves are alive and deserve protections of laws and the Constitution. But as I said before, the Abortionists on the left won't even support a "Born Alive" law that gives the right to life to any child born alive. The hard left must have abortions of all types and at all times to satisfy their thirst for innocent blood. The left cannot support Human Rights, because Socialists don't have Human Rights. They only have the rights that their Dictators give them. Why are you unwilling to say whether or not you have children? I suspect it is because you know what the follow up questions might be: If you said no... Then how can you pretend to know more than a parent? Or if you said yes....Did you love your unborn child? Was your unborn child a human? I had a significant epiphany when I saw my 1st child's ultrasound... That's when I became pro-life. I don't call pro-Abortion people murderers because I used to agree with them, and I was not a murderer. I was the left's useful idiot.
How can you make informed decisions about medical issues without even the basic fundamental knowledge of reproductive physiology? Where in any text does it refer to an embryo as a "child". It has the potential to become human, it is of human origen but as yet has not met those physiological milestones that make it fully "human" Cognition is the key
Wow! OK Let us put aside the emotive hype What part of the reproductive process are you saying the potential human becomes a "child"? Let us talk with academic detachment
FoxHastings said: ↑ What do you mean by "self serving propaganda " ? Why would PP be "ashamed" of what they do? Apply some common sense. They perform a legal medical procedure. If any of them are ashamed of that I would think they would leave.... I didn't say they were proud YOU did NOT address one word of the post of mine you quoted... Another conclusion with no common sense... why would they have to be proud of what they do? WHY would they lie about the numbers?? They have no reason to lie about the numbers....
Good point! And another example of their only concern is for the UNborn....once you're here you're fair game for abuse..