PRINCETON, NJ -- In many respects, the demographic profile of Democrats nationwide is similar to what it was in 2008, although Democrats have become somewhat less white and more liberal than the party that nominated Barack Obama as its presidential candidate that year. As a group, Democrats are more likely than average to be women and nonwhite, less likely to be religious or married, much less likely to be conservative, and much more likely to be liberal than the U.S. population as a whole. http://www.gallup.com/poll/150611/Democrats-Liberal-Less-White-2008.aspx
Then how does this explain very white and very liberal and very Democratic New England? And Oregon? Washington state? Iowa? Minnesota? Wisconsin? Some of the lilly whitest states in the Union = going for Obama by double-digits.
That was 2008. Many (if not most) of those states are not going to be going for Obama in 2012 (if there is even an election, Obama may declare war to stop the election) If an election is held in 2012 Obama will probably only win HI, CA, IL, MA, and NY!!!!
GAWD I love watching you T-Baggers squirm and make (*)(*)(*)(*) up. Democrats are single, non-white, godless people. LOL...I have 2 words for anyone who believes such divisive crappola... YOU SUCK
Not a T-bagger. Don't believe in America. Am a White Nationalist however. Look at the OP, that is increasingly the trend! It is hard to argue with facts.
Well, at least you're honest about it. You might get along well with Hjalmar, if he's still around. We've also got a few Nazies here too.
