Democrats must be removed from office

You might as well have said so making blanket statements on a political party with millions of members and voters with loaded words like 'treason'.

 

Support of suppression of freedom carbon taxes
Support of infringement of 2A gun confiscation
Support of infringement of 1A business right to refuse service, wearing MAGA hat, right to publicly speak at colleges.
Support of infringement of 4A patriot act, government monitoring of communication, government control of healthcare

I could go on all day.

 

What SCOTUS ruling are you talking about, and how is the dems running an impeachment inquiry violating it?

 

So this is an admission you were blatently lying?

 

None of that is treasonous.

 

This thread is getting off topic, please stay on topic.

 

Any attempt to subvert the Constitution and the Citizens rights it guarantees is an act of treason against the American people.

 

No one is trying to subvert the constitution.

 

No, just my way of saying that you have a serious problem with a large segment of the American population. You may not express your hatred in the words I used but it's the same degree of hate.

 

Everyone who has read this knows you lied, but you do not admit it. So much for your credibility.

 

Welcome to my ignore club.

 

Thank you, My preference to debate people with some degree of credibility...

 

We will have to agree to disagree on this since you know you are right and I know that I am right.

 

Trump's actions were just the final straw, there is plenty to impeach Trump on in just the mueller report alone

 

only if Pence did the same things Trump is doing they deserve impeaching, but do not see that happening

but it's a mute point as Republican in the Senate think the ends justifies the means and will let Trump get away with anything he does

Trump needs to be impeached by the house, and then the people can vote to fire him in 2020

 

Your inablility to produce the languaged in Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Article II that supports you allegation is proof in itself you are wrong. And you know it.

 

it's impeachable to ask another countries government to investigate your political opponent for political reasons

can't believe the right is even trying to defend this behavior

 

The Tea Party movement was launched February 19, 2009, a month after Obama took office. Your point is? Do you think it should be made illegal for people to protest?

My view: The more imminent the threat is to Trump, the more unhinged his supporters become. They can dish it out, they just can't take it when she shoe is on the other foot.

 

There was nothing in the Mueller report. If there was, the Democrats would have jumped all over it. It was a waste of taxpayer money, and proof that the Democrats are on a political witch hunt. It damaged their credibility, and this latest witch hunt will destroy what little credibility they had left.
Come 2020, the public will not believe anything the Democrats have to say and their political base will be completely demoralized.

 

The Ukraine got there Javelins.

Did the Ukraine give up the Crowdstrike server or investigated the Biden's for President Trump ?

Sure would be nice if they did.

Still way to many unanswered questions on why the DNC refused the FBI access to their hacked servers.

 

Your statement shows you are completely ignorant of the law. If you insist it is an impeachable offense, then simply quote the language of the statute or regulation that makes it illegal. On the other hand if you cannot produce this language, I would expect you to have the personal integrity to admit it.

 

What are you talking about? The Tea Party movement was created to oppose oppressive taxes, how is that equivalent to direct and unfounded attacks on a sitting President?

 

wow, per the whistle-blower, they tried to hide this conversation and this may not be the first time

https://www.cnn.com/2019/09/26/politics/read-whistleblower-complaint-trump-ukraine/index.html

(U) Supplementary classified information is provided as follows:
(U) Additional information related to Section II

"According to multiple White House officials I spoke with, the transcript of the President's call with President Zelenskyy was placed into a computer system managed directly by the National Security Council (NSC) Directorate for Intelligence Programs. This is a standalone computer system reserved for codeword-level intelligence information , such as covert action. According to information I received from White House officials, some officials voiced concerns internally that this would be an abuse of the system and was not consistent with the responsibilities of the Directorate for Intelligence Programs. According to White House officials I spoke with, this was "not the first time" under this Administration that a Presidential transcript was placed into this codeword-level system solely for the purpose of protecting politically sensitive — rather than national security sensitive — information ."

 

Haha, your double standard is showing again. My criticism of the other side = well founded and justified. The other side's criticism of my side = unfounded attacks. It's funny, your double standard is so blatant, you can't even see it yourself.

BTW: At the time the Tea Party was founded, there were no new taxes yet, definitely no oppressive ones. In fact, I think I survived the "oppressive" taxes under Obama quite well.

 

there is no right for public businesses to discriminate based on race or gender

republican created the patriot act

dems do not want to ban guns, just make ar-15's as hard to get as manchine guns

I do not agree with a carbon tax, but I do agree climate change is an issue