Democrats Not Ready for Hillary

The dems can't run a white man at this point. They've already campaigned on how evil white men are.

I suspect they will run Al Sharpton since he's a moderate

 

Or how utterly pathetic their field is.

They really have nobody worthy of running.

They are going to have to hope for an anti-Trump vote instead of someone who wants to vote for their candidate.

 

There is no Democrat that the (R) peanut gallery would not automatically hate and attack. Obviously no Democratic candidate will be selected to try and win over the likes of the above.

 

We will see I suppose.

There really is nobody else other than Hillary and the outside shot of Oprah.

I suppose Warren could give it a shot but she has so, so much baggage she probably couldn't do it.

If someone doesn't pop out of the woodwork within the next six months I'd say their chances get pretty dim.

 

Lol if they ran Oprah I would be so happy. The left would be running a TV host after years about bitching about TV hosts.

Oh man.

 

Not true.

If we saw a democrat working with Trump right now I'd say I'd have no problem with that person running for the dems.

Unfortunately we don't see that at all.

 

not much different from any other poll, ask a 'targeted & limited' number of people to get a desired result... imo, every polster is the same, all malarkey...

 

Yea but out of all of them I'd be most worried about her.

If it turns out she actually has debate skills she might be tougher than you think.

Her name recognition alone is off the charts, solid reputation, not considered a hardcore liberal.

Black and female to boot.

 

She checks all the social issue boxes for Dems. Will the DNC like her though? She publicly announced she isn't running thus far though.

 

if the dems are serious about getting back in the whitehouse, they better pull their reigns in out in cali, now that they are 'veto' proof they will run amok, and if they do so before 2020, everyone will see them for whom they really are... patience isn't one of their virtues...

 

That means nothing, she has plenty of time to change her mind.

I don't know if the DNC would get behind her, I'd imagine they'd wait to see the excitement behind her first before they support her. It took a long time for the RNC to get behind Trump remember.

As far as experience goes that's really irrelevant since all presidents learn on the job, there is really nothing that trains you for it. What she would need are a couple of strong issues to start thumping like Trump did, that was his key to winning.

He was clear and on message the entire time.

People like that.

She would also need to pick a very strong VP. I'd say that Joseph Kennedy III would be an outstanding pick for her.

 

True, and as a rule they always overplay their hand.

 

Or use that by coming out against it in some form.

That would be a pretty powerful statement in my opinion.

Trump is actually winning the polling on immigration so the democrats would be wise to pick up on that.

 

i don't mind if hillary runs again, butt ffs could someone get her one of those stephen hawkings voice boxes...

 

Its a BS survey.

The question: "repealing the 2nd amendment so we can enact effective gun laws."

From that "question" they then conclude that Democrats want to repeal the 2nd amendment. They are not mutually exclusive options. It is specifically worded to come up with a predetermined outcome. The 2nd amendment does not need to be repealed to enact effective gun laws

 

Fellow Dems ha ha ha ha ha! , Dems , REM's, or Schmems people have a right to have an opinion on the EC...

BTW- The EC and the proportionment of two Senators per state is not a Bill of Rights item ( amendment). Maybe you should familiarize yourself with the Constitution before you go off running of the flappers.

While you are at that learning task go and read up on the fact that the founding fathers built in a process to amend the Constitution. In facts that even added ten amendment- maybe you may have heard of them they are called the Bill of Rights.

 

People who wants to repeal the 2nd are extremely few yet you want to bring up this scare mongering tactics. This liberal own firearms. Get a grip.

 

Oh? that's not what the RW were saying when Obama was running for the presidency lol.

 

Isn't it amazing to think that we'd go from:

2008-2016: Rookie senator as President
2016-(?): Non politician business man and entertainer
2020 (possibly): Non politician business woman and entertainer

 

The polled dems (likely voters) seemed quite in favor of repealing the 2nd.

I suspect many more would prefer the same effect without having a super-majority to repeal it.

 

NO. They want sensible gun laws. That is NOT repeal of the second amendment. The wording their matters.

The question “repealing the 2nd amendment so we can enact effective gun laws”, become the headline “DEMOCRATS WANT TO REPEAL THE SECOND EMENDMENT”.........curiously leaving out the rest of the sentence because, again, the 2 are not mutually exclusive. If they were, then the sentence would have contained BOTH questions

 

Can you define sensible gun laws? (hint its a meaningless phrase)

What democrat run states do have these, and kindly link to the decrease in violence as a result.

 

Now your moving the goalpost. All i said was that the question is worded to elicit a predefined response. I never said I agreed with the either side of the question.

You cant use a subjective word like “sensible” to describe a law. It is again, designed to elicit a predefined response

 

The Constitution can be used by extreme of the extreme by either side to try and infringe or take away our rights.

The diference is that the Left extreme will try to infringe one way and the Right another way.

I do not turn my back at either of the extremes, left or right.

Do not be blinded by either side

 

One or two voices does not an entire party make.
Where did Rep Ownens get? Thank God nowhere.

There was one or two Leftist whacks who proposed reparations slavery . That has not happened and there is no serious bill in Congress is there! That us not a question, it is a statement.