Detroit music festival sets ticket prices based on race

There is a pleasant mix in certain circles.

 

The silver lining here is we get to see people make a stand, in this case rappers ZUBY and Tiny Jag.

 

It's 2019

 

It's for the non POCs own good. It's Detroit. Hundreds of POC will be there. Most will be armed. Remember this date Aug 4th. That's when we'll see what the body count is.

 

But Rachel Dolezal pays double.

 

One day, POC will stand for People of Character!

 

More on Tina Jag pulling out of the the racist concert here.

http://politicalforum.com/index.php?threads/stranger-than-truth-but-is.422322/page-3#post-1070743916

I put the affair in Humor & Satire Forum, "Stranger Than Truth, but is" Thread.
The double pricing does fit, "stranger than truth". Si?


Moi

How Much For s?​

 

This isn't legal so why even try. Kinda weird.

 

Because they know that blacks get away with any type of discrimination against whites.

 

sadly so is the right....

both white and black racism is wrong

 

Dont blame trump for liberal hate

When blacks achieved legal equality the race hustlers needed a new angle

Attacking whites for things that happened before they were born is the new liberal civil rights gig

 

Unfortunately, I deal with this same situation in my business daily. I am white and male. When I do work for the State, I have to include a certain percentage of the project to be given to firms owned by minorities, women, and veterans. These values often exceed 20% of my contract.

In many cases, we don't need sub-contractors to facilitate the work, or worse, we have to use subs that really are a struggle to get things accomplished.

Its all ridiculous.

 

And it was changed with the public accommodations section of the Civil Rights Act.

"42 U.S.C. §2000a(b) Each of the following establishments is a place of public accommodation within this title if its operations affect commerce, or if discrimination or segregation by it is supported by State action: (1) any inn, hotel, motel, or other establishment which provides lodging to transient guests, other than an establishment located within a building which contains not more than five rooms for rent or hire and which is actually occupied by the proprietor of such establishment as his residence. (2) any restaurant, cafeteria, lunchroom, lunch counter, soda fountain, or other facility principally engaged in selling food for consumption on the premises, including, but not limited to, any such facility located on the premises of any retail establishment, or any gasoline station;

(3) any motion picture house, theater, concert hall, sports arena, stadium or other place of exhibition or entertainment; and (4) any establishment (A)(i) which is physically located within the premises of any establishment otherwise covered by this subsection, or (ii) within the premises of which is physically located any such covered establishment and (B) which holds itself out as serving patrons of any such covered establishment.
https://www.justice.gov/crt/title-ii-civil-rights-act-public-accommodations

Are you suggesting we scrap it?

 

The policy was changed days ago.

This thread is DEAD.