Did Trump or anyone in his campaign collude or attempt to collude?

It appears Mueller kept very close to the narrow, restricted mission his investigation was conceived on. He limited himself to following possible collusion & any financial felonies that might get swept up in the wash of the investigation. Mueller evidently concluded he had insufficient evidence to charge anyone with collusion with Russia. I see no evidence he concentrated any effort on investigating obstruction of justice, perhaps feeling it was too far afield for his narrow focus. So, that charge is left unresolved.

 

Irrelevant as you know. Mueller's report will speak for itself assuming we ever actually get to see it.

 

Stupid but Trump isn't America!

 

Where did it say that?

 

Which efforts did the Trump campaign reject?

 

He's working for you no matter how much you hate it.

 

That is for sure. But I am the rich. It is you poor fools that are getting suckered. I can live and move anywher in the world and take my money with me. You are going to be the left behinds of the great society when Trump finally bankrupts America both financially and morally.

 

For some reason, I can't find a version where I can cut and paste the pertinent segment.
It's on page one of the full letter.

"did not find that the Trump campaign or anyone associated with it conspired or coordinated with Russia in its efforts to influence the 2016 U.S. presidential election."

https://www.scribd.com/document/402...tter-to-House-and-Senate-Judiciary-Committees

 

I'm OK.

 

Now that is a true thought crime. You are true to form if nothing else.

 

Yet another thought crime.

The report "did not establish that members of the trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government in its election interference activities". The quotes are from the report.

You are quoting Barr's language, not muellers.

Not that the nuance will make any difference to you.

 

Yep. No difference.

 

Thanks for the display of your critical thinking skills. Your moniker appears even more appropriate.

 

Is Mueller dead? Is he being held captive by THE RUSSIANS?

He doesn't seem to be objecting to Barr's summary.

 

The ones Barr referenced from the Mueller report including the Trump Tower meeting.

 

Obstruction was in the Rosenstein authoriation letter taking over the existing FBI investigation and Mueller was not restricted nor hampered stop with the canards. He found NO evidence of collusion by anyone, any American anyone associate with the Trump campaign. This is the THIRD official investigation to say the same thing.

I'm listening to former Trump senior adviser Michael Caputo is discussing his his over $200,000 in legal bills, how he lost his business, how others had to mortgage house and deplete all their savings and were not only never charged with a crime but never accused of a crime and Mueller found no crimes.
How do these people get their lives back, how do the get their retirement savings their kids college funds back?

 

Totally relevent if Barr and Rosenstien are making false claims and misrepresenting Mueller's report he and his office not only are free to refute it but would have a duty to do so and I have no doubt Mueller would be issuing such a statement.

 

If it has a text tab you can copy and paste. I got the same from that. A direct quote from the Mueller report.

 

Thanks for the sound bite.

 

Er, the man leaked nothing during the whole process. I believe he'll let his report speak for itself as well, until such time he is called to testify about it. He sure as hell ain't going to contradict or embellish his bosses approach to its release in the media. That's for politicians to duke out.

 

oops.

 

ACtually you have no idea if they found any evidence. You have no idea what the report contains other than 180 words of a 300 page report. About the same number of words that trump is capable of reading and absorbing at any one time.

 

Yes I do, it's in Barr's summary.

 

I would consider trump telling one truth a miracle.

 

What exactly do you think "does not exonerate him" as a direct quote from 300 page report mean?