Do liberals even KNOW about the 100,000 illegal kids, all alone, coming across the

border lately? Have they even SEEN the pictures (if they don't watch Fox?)

Has there been anything about it on network news? I'm pretty confident that Huff Post and Media Matters isn't going to advertise it. Or does the Huff Post just say, "Fox News lying about all the kids coming across border and being stuffed by the govt into small rooms by the hundreds. Don't believe them. It's all bull. You know how they lie."

 

Known about it for a while. It's a humanitarian problem on par with Mariel Boat Lift.

I'm about to start work with a company setting up shelters for them.

 

Of course the libs know. Who do you think planned and organized this invasion? It certainly wasn't any spur-of-the-moment decision and many of the smaller kids were in the care of an adult......

 

in Mexico?

 

In America. Let me guess, you support sending children to starve in an active war zone, don't you?

 

what??? These kids arent from Syria, Libya, nor Iraq.

boot em out, and send em home, to their parents.

The United States of America isnt a daycare.

 

And Mexico isn't in any way safe. They have a de facto civil war going on. These refugees should not be sent there.

 

I dont give a (*)(*)(*)(*). Thats Mexico's problem not ours.

When are they gonna release that marine? oh thats right.... freakn never.

 

OP...You obviously do not watch anything other than Fox if you are under the impression that no other media is covering this. If Fox is taking a break from BENGHAZI and The IRS non-scandals to do non-stop coverage on this issue, it's due to the fact that they are squeezing a conspiracy theory out of this as the others have not panned out.

 

So you admit that you support sending children into an active war zone? Good. Now we can ignore you freely any time you complain about innocent people dying.

 

You know, I don't usually listen to Fox unless I want a good laugh. So how about this why don't you post the article in question and I'll show you an even funnier video clip? I'm sure you'll like it a lot.

 

No, dont act like a freakn child.

I support enforcing our (*)(*)(*)(*)n laws.

Why do you want to ignore our laws?

 

I cannot speak for any or all liberals, but from my observation, liberals do know that there are 100k children coning to the U.S. with almost all of them with no visas or other valid points to entry. What liberals do disagree is the reasons why they are coming. From my observations, most conservatives do not care for the reason why, just that they have come and then use deragatoryt terms or attempt ot validate their own version of superiority.

The fact is that immigration, legal and illegal, is complex. Poeple come for different reasons. Trying to lump all children as gangsters because they come from a coutntry where gangs do exist is ludicrous and uninformed. Furthemrore, there is a Supreme Court ruling called Flores v Reno. This court ruloing stipulaes that Cchildren who come to the U.S. and are in violation of 8 USC can be detained or can be given a bond or can be release on their own recognance. However, the government has to be make sure that the children are given every opportunity if they meet immigration padmission because they cannot be held accountable for other people's actionis or even their own. Conservatives do not want that.

 

That which is unjust is not law.

Any law that mandates sending children to a war zone is one undeserving of being enforced.

 

enforcing our laws means that if the children qualify for TPS, then USCIS should issue the visa to them.

 

it is an rules for radicals Saul Alinsky Cloward-Piven tactic of over whelming and breaking a system there for to get the outrage of the public to abolish or reform the system this way the ones in power can create there own system to fit their agenda

remember Obama was a community organizer everything he does can be contributed to rules for radicals, Saul Alinsky and Cloward-Piven Strategy

 

no, it means the children shouldnt be allowed to cross the border.

wtf?

- - - Updated - - -

dont act dumb. Theyre not freakn refugees. Their illegal immigrants.

 

They are refugees. Right wingers may not want to admit it but there is a war going on in Mexico. Sending these kids back in unconscionable.

 

No, theres no war going on in Mexico.

No, theyre not refugees.

 

How much do you want to bet that if I search this forum I can find a post of you referring to the war going on in Mexico? I bet it will be involving cartels acting across the US border and you will have probably blamed or condemned Obama in some way.

Shall we see?

 

Libs know but they just don't care.

 

Globally the number of forcibly displaced worldwide is 45.2 million

At what point does the bleeding heart...bleed out.

There is no shortage of suffering on this planet, one could argue...life itself is suffering.

However what good is a nation with the best of intentions which bankrupts itself in the process of carrying out these best of intentions. Just on our own citizens, we've amassed the highest percentage of spending on entitlements. So we throw more money at it, that's it. Illegals from Mexico deserve the best education, healthcare that money can buy, it's their right...this is your solution?

At some point, even the most bleeding heart liberal needs to learn to say no.

 

And the people we need to draw that line with are children? Is the Right really that heartless?

 

We abort 1.2 million annually.
We think nothing of taking a 3 month old in the womb and disposing of it in a bio-hazard incinerator. So a child only matters when it can smile, look all cute and pull at our heart strings...then they matter. A fetus, not so much.

And Consevatives are heartless?

perhaps you should learn the word hypocrisy....

 

I don't support abortion. However I also don't think we should have laws effectively nationalizing the bodies of every women in the country.