The only white persons I've ever come across were dead, and their political approaches were not evident. I think this is a poll for the KKK surely?
Yes, Democrats - the party of racial segregation and founded on racism and slavery - often refer to a poll that asserts that anyone who isn't white is sub-human and therefore should not be counted. But for the two lowest educated demographic groups - blacks and Latinos - the Democratic Party would barely qualify as a 3rd party. Explain why YOU CLAIM that ONLY white people should be considered in polling? Afterall, that is YOUR decision to present. Is it your position that only white people should be allowed to vote? You have posted MANY messages such as this that appear to have that as the core premise you are asserting. Most people recognize the contempt the Democratic Party has for blue collar and ordinary Americans - which also is another point of your post, isn't it? Democrats promise to pay off college debts. It is called buying votes with the public treasury. No surprise that people without college degrees are not agreeable to having money taken out their pay checks to pay for other people going to college. Instead, people with college degrees should be paying off the credit card debts of those without college degrees, don't you think?
Yes but sir here's where you're completely wrong. Democrats paying off student loan debt means that more poor white workers, the ones you claim to stand for, get jobs created by those college graduates who had their loans paid off. All those white construction workers who build all those fancy apartments and giant suburbs, who do you seriously think fuels their construction business? Poor people buying 500k homes? Yeah right. No way. It's "The Evil college-educated people" that you insist shouldn't have had help on their loans who are responsible directly for the average poor white man to be able to feed his family at night. The truth that you can't stomach is that the more people who have a degree, the more jobs are created across the board. You can't have the great economy you want and the modern country we have without a large, educated population. Education creates jobs for poor white people even if those very poor white people may not fully grasp that truth.
Wow, so very wrong. Let's go to any major construction site and "see" how many of the white construction workers are Democrats. Yeah my money is on NONE.
Well, at least another indicator is added to the list. How the hell, can ANYONE, based solely off the indicators of white female, have insight one into the political affiliation of the subject?
Jesus, he made a jokey, macho throw-away remark in a men's locker-room and that makes him a woman-hater/misogynist? Don't you think that's over-reacting just a teeny bit?
If you want to deny reality and deal in vagueness so as to continually perpetuate your factions ideology and or side then that's your right but don't think for a second we can't all see that. You know very well labels exist because they're accurate.
I'm going by the title of the thread, & the poll question. Being politically independent, I find labels.... Better put, ASSUMING the label for others a bore. Do carry on.
Labels are accurate. I'm not sorry. They are. Otherwise they wouldn't exist. They exist because they're accurate (on the whole, OBVIOUSLY there exist exceptions, but we are all adults here, we don't have to pretend we don't understand this like demented little 12 year old's.. AHEM.).
His arbitrarily walking into the beauty pageant changing area and ogling the teenage contestants in various stages of undress. His referring to a woman as having 'blood coming out of her whatever'. His attack of a woman's looks during the "debates". His tweet attack of a woman, referring to her "facelift", and 'blood' once again. Oh, and that was hardly a jokey, since he described the grabbing of women by their private parts, etc. Trump should keep that stuff to himself, and not flap away when he knew he was being recorded. He was obviously bragging. Keep it to the locker room, which he did not do.
Well nobody's perfect? Seriously though, I didn't know about the references to menstruation, and that is a bit near the knuckle. But then that's Trump - he's just a bit gauche and insensitive; but if he makes a good president (and I think that in his way he will), he'll put some of the more useless ones - and that's most of them - to shame?
In general? Sure. 54% voted for Clinton: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/11/08/us/politics/election-exit-polls.html Pretty slim majority though. Not at all like blacks.
Fifty four percent of all women voted for Clinton, but a 53% of white women voted for Trump. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2016/11/white-women-support-gop/507617/
Attractive and Fit women do indeed seem more left leaning in my experience. Older larger women are sometimes right leaning to the extreme.
It would seem we two have differing experience with women, perhaps because I was referring to personal observation and you are using talking point imagination combined with cartoon stereotype.
No, just to my wife and the other females I'm around. BTW the cartoon stereotype of the hairy legged woman is never a conservative. Fixed it for you.
I never said it was, in fact I did not in any way comment on conservative women. Instead replied to your assertion that women who do not shave their legs are left leaning. I will admit that most granola crunching flowerchildren are liberal in general but many unattractive females are noted at Trump rallies every time. I do not require or desire your "Fix" as it would far degrade anything I typed.
And there are a lot of hot women at Trump rallies. At Antifa rallies not so much. BTW have you seen some of the pigs surrounding the Hildebeest at her "college tour?"