Do you think the things that President Trump is being accused of are wrong?

This coming from the alt left radicals that defended Obama- a guy who sent White House Aides to the funeral of a guy who tried to murder a police officer.

Excuse the rest of the world for not believing your "outrage".

 

I'd like to see all the facts before passing judgement. I wouldn't want to look stupid like alt left radicals did with the Russia stuff.

 

I've already said I don't think I will vote for Obama as President any more. But I thought we were talking about Trump

 

What is a Trumper ???

 

I'm a Trumper, if you want to call me that, and I'll be one until a viable conservative runs for president. There are so many things I don't like about this president..... his results are not one. It simply goes to show that a completely moronic individual with a big public mouth is still miles above the choice of electing a so-called Progressive candidate, and the choice we had was quite nightmarish IMO. I am holding out hope that a true conservative candidate will arise from this entire mess with a resolve to continue moving this country away from its prior path of destruction. Someone who could reign in a trembling Republican party by leading with responsible and sensible positions would be preferable. If a person does emerge, it is my feeling that they won't be a Never-Trumper, but someone who says they agree with what he's done, but not the way he's gone about it. But sometimes, drastic measures are called for. Electing a clown such as Trump was most certainly a drastic measure taken by the American people. We had no other choice IMO.

 

think search engine... the more posts, the more threads in forums & other boards, the more hashtags, when someone 'searches' the 'trump' subject, thousands of pages all with negative connotations pop up... it is, imo, an organized thing... people are persuaded with far less bombardment...

 

Voted Trump Support and its wrong. It was wrong imo not because of the act but because politically it was dumb. I think that what Trump did has been done before so that's not shocking to me its the lack of forethought thats shocking. Trump should've been prepared by this point that Democrats are trying to tank him for the inside and he gave them free ammo. Then he says no Quid pro Quo when he didn't need to paint himself in that corner because a Quid Pro Quo isnt always an illegal thing. Then there's the whole using Rudy who can easily be tied back to him......

Piss poor execution and giving Democrats free ammo, not great at all imo

 

Nice rant.

 

But nothing happened.

 

He is very guilty of a fashion faux pas with his hair.

 

There was nothing about the Nixon impeachment and the Trump persecution that is the same except both are driven by a Democrat majority. Nixon's team was involved in a burglary that I'll never understand because he didn't need anything they could find. He was a good President and popular but made some terrible decisions in the chaos of Watergate.

Poor Trump beat Hillary.

 

if you think i like Hillary i think you've misjudged me lol

 

I think it would be wrong, yes.

But there's no evidence that it happened, so it's a silly question...

 

Wasn't trying to imply that, just to illustrate that the two events had a very different beginning.

 

How can you be a Trump supporter and believe that it is ok....that right there, based on the evidence is wrong.

 

Worse than right or wrong. It is all partisan.

 

Withholding money until a country investigates corruption that includes our citizens. Not only is that not wrong but it is normal politics. Now if he had asked them to LIE then I would be upset. But Trump did not make up the concerns about that company or Bidens son.

 

Actually, I think that it actually is wrong if the citizen you want investigated is a political rival as it would lead to your personal gain … which is an abuse of power whether or not the citizen in question is guilty.

 

Wait, so you can be as corrupt as you want and as long as you or one of your relatives is running for office you can be immune to investigation?

 

Nope, but you can be immune from having one of your political rivals or their proxies, if they are currently in office, ask a foreign government to investigate you in exchange for some gift or favor.

Edit: added "or their proxies"

 

Clinton, Obama or any non-Republican president would be crucified for things Trump has done, and not just the things for which articles of impeachment are being drafted.

 

Why is that? We should be asking those powers to investigate. It would be improper for us to send in our intelligence people to do so without their permission. Also if we are sending them money we should know that any potential corruptive influences from OUR citizens has been neutralized or at least mitigated. IF what Trump had hear is true then funds sent to that country could be at risk from our own citizens and the corruption of their oligarchs. It would be irresponsible of the President NOT to have those entities investigated. I guarantee if we send money to the Ukraine and it does get embezzled by our own citizens Trump would get the blame.

 

You’ve revealed your character. I could care less what you call the 63 million who voted for Trump.

 

What is wrong would be giving hundreds of millions or billions in the case of obama to countries and expecting nothing in return.

 

So why did you ask what a "Trumper" was, when that was blindingly obvious?. i must apologize. When I'm asked snarky questions I sometimes respond in kind.