You dont want to believe that fetuses can sometimes survive? Or you dont want to believe that there are cold-hearted women out there who would force a baby out of the womb before it had a chance to finish developing, and then dump it like a piece of garbage?
One problem: premature infants can display signs of lividity too, especially when they are barely hanging on to life and their heart is beginning to fail. "Vasomotor instability and peripheral circulatory sluggishness are revealed by deep redness or purple lividity in a crying infant, whose color may deepen profoundly... The skin of premature infants is thin and delicate and tends to be deep red..." (Nelson Textbook of Pediatrics, Robert M. Kliegman)
- - - Updated - - - At this point, it is safe to assume that you care about the lives of children up until it requires doing more than posting in a forum. You speak out against abortion, yet refuse to become part of the solution. There is a young lady who has a tough decision to make. She is pregnant and knows that she is unfit to parent the child. She can give the baby up for adoption, but there is very little demand and it is likely the child will grow up without ever feeling the love of a parent. She comes to the conclusion that abortion is the humane choice. People like you who turn your backs to these babies are part of the problem. The harsh truth is that you are just as cold-hearted and these lives are no more valuable to you than garbage. You can type words until your fingers lock up, but there is absolutely zero value in your posts.
And a stray dog put this woman to shame. If you can see nothing else in this thread, look at that. The baby was "too much trouble" for the human mother, but even a stray dog had the humanity to rescue the baby.
I think the dog was saying lunch as republicans make it harder to get legal Abortions, we will see more of this .
Animals react out of instinct, a dog can't possess "humanity" (only in your mind)........your comparison of dogs to women is not surprising. Dogs clean their private parts with their tongue....they greet each other by sniffing crotches.....do you recommend this for people, too?
It is very big of you to admit to being put to shame by a dog. You have rescued ZERO babies. I would not adopt one in a house I would not adopt a single mouse I care about them, or so it seems just not enough to act, Joakim
Not to the extent it is seen on those pictures. Another point is that lividty in living premature babies is a very different colouration to that of a dead baby. Lividity on a living baby is much more red in colouration that lividity on a dead baby, which appears purple. You still haven't addressed the fact that the "baby" is not autonomically correct, nor have you provided ANY evidence that the birth was an induced labour abortion, nor have you addressed the various versions of this story ranging from Oman to Brazil, or addressed that no papers or TV in either country has reported it, or how the photographs came to be taken, it seems that IF it is true then the person who took the photos was more interested in doing that then rescuing the baby. hence why in my opinion the whole thing is a set up and fake.
Except there is no evidence that the dog "rescued" the baby, or that the dog was a stray .. in fact the reality is that if the dog was a stray it would have eaten the baby where it found it.
This is why I call it LieNews. ETA: Even Snopes can't find anything corroborating the story http://www.snopes.com/dog-saves-abandoned-newborn/
How about the cold hearted men who would force women to gestate against their will, treating us as no better than broodmares?
Can't respond, can't defend ....another "" Weird Thread"" fail.... If you ever have the nerve could you explain how this has anything to do with abortion except for the reason I gave.......that something like this ( which REALLY didn't happen and the thread should have been removed) would ONY prove that abortion should be legal and safe everywhere. Have the guts to admit it...
Sorry, I missed this. You can believe that it is wrong, but if all you're willing to do about it is post on forums, you are condoning it. What we tolerate, we also condone. You can voice your opinion about elephants and tigers, but your words have zero weight unless you are actually doing something about it. I would love to adopt an elephant, but I lack the ability to care for it properly, so my donations will have to suffice. When it comes down to it, there are no pro-lifers on this forum, whose words have any more value than a dried up dog turd on the sidewalk. (Based on my experience thus far)
Elephants and tigers survive on their own before being attacked. The fetus needs extreme care. This one, however, was old enough it should have been given to a hospital from the start. Still, they should not be looking for the mother.
- - - Updated - - - Newborn elephants and tigers need extreme care as well. They cannot survive on their own, and when their mothers are killed they also die.
You pretend to know who does or does not "do something about it" in real life. You don't know that. And "talking about it" is part of doing something about it both here and in real life.
I am not pretending to know; I am simply asking. So far, not one reply. As far as "talking about it" being a part of doing something, is has the same value as doing nothing. Until talk becomes actions, it is 100% worthless. I can say with certainty that there is not one pro-lifer here that cares beyond talking. When it comes to results, it's the same as not caring at all.
Talking about issues leads to action. But perhaps you can explain to us how not talking about issues can possibly lead to action? And your claim of certainty about pro-lifers is a lie. Again, you have no clue.
Were you addressing someone in particular? I can answer this : ""But perhaps you can explain to us how not talking about issues can possibly lead to action?"" Easy, shut up about abortion and adoption and adopt a kid or two or three.......and don't break into a sweat if the government spends a penny on BIRTH CONTROL...
