DOJ announces special counsel for Trump-related Mar-a-Lago and January 6 criminal investigations

Im sure he is referring to ALL the allegations of crime over the last 7 years, not just the last 2. Thus his reference to 7 years instead of 2.
Genius!
You do better to just proclaim "NO" and then go on about some irrelevancy.

 

I'm thinking the Democrats are convinced they've discovered a winning strategy to win elections. It's not about actually proving anything. It's just about keeping up the appearance that Trump deserves to be charged.

 

I don't recall him giving specific dates. Just total years where Trump has been accused of crimes and yet uncharged. If I take the time to take another look at his post you better not be wasting my time. I'll expect an apology.

 

IF that's reality ... it is a sad one. TRaitor tRump has spent his life breaking the law, just a little bit, and getting away with it. But when he was president he went WAY beyond "a little bit". IF there is to be justice in America for anyone there needs to be justice in America for everyone. It's TRaitor tRumps time to pay the Piper.

 

How could he prove it when he never charged and took to court and the AG and DAG and OLC all said there were no crimes. Mueller would be derelict in his duty not bring the charges for crimes he found. He was hired to PROSECUTE.

 

Ok, I looked. You owe me an apology. Here are his words.

"Which would make the left the dumbest people on the planet since they haven't even charged Trump in 7 years, much less convicted. lol
So all you have is the same ole same ole. Whining about Trump being a criminal you can't even get a charge on."

No where does he cite specific years. For someone that does his research before posting crap, you're not very good at it.

 

This is a great opportunity to see if he can admit his error over something stupid.

 

I think he is disingenuous not mistaken.

 

Nope, no one claimed it did. Do you have a point relevant to the topic of discussion? Or just another dash off into irrelevancy seeking refuge from your previous assertions.

 

Nah. You first have to be mistaken before becoming disingenuous.

 

My math started when Dumbasscrats hired 50 FBI officers, two dozen CIA officials, 17 intelligence agencies, and started their impeachment the day of inauguration.
Sorry your fake propaganda can never stand up to reality.

 

Should start July 2016 when they started the Crossfire Hurricane Investigation based upon the Steele Dossier.

 

Nonsense. When someone says Trump is a criminal, the onus isn't on Trump to prove it. Surely, you know something about the burden of proof used by our justice system, don't you? It doesn't seem like you do.

 

Yep. The weaponized FBI who was working for the establishment swamp, were up to no good right there and then and it's never stopped since.

 

YES

 

How about some proof of an actual claim? Then it won't seem made up.

 

wrong, what saved Hillary is they couldn’t prove she intentionally mishandled anything classified

 

And I have shown multiple times on this board WHY that conclusion was drawn. And if you read the actuall report, he does say that Manafort shared their data with an “agent of the russian government”

To what ? What is he accused of doing ?

Ummm, your WRONG.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/08/22/us/politics/trump-mar-a-lago-documents.html

The Justice Department said they did know, and that they asked for them back, and he refused so they raided Mar-a-Lago

Mar-A-Lago is a secured facitlity ?

BS. Stop with that clearely debunked BS.

YES a POTUS CAN declassify, but there is a process to follow. If you honestly think that he can just stand over a box and yell “i declassify thee” you are sadly mistaken.

But I will give the opportunity to show us the law that claims he has the power to declassify without notification. Seriously, show us the law

Oh FFS, you have absolutly no clue what actually happened here. But thats not really surprising. You may want to read up on Jareds company why this “investment” smells to high heaven.

Ask yourself how an official from the Trump White House got an “investment” from a foreign country that he was working with on behalf of the United States government.

But you wont do the basic research and will come black claiming everything is on the up and up.

And I wil ask this: How is this ANY different than Hunter getting a job at Burisma ? Hint: Both are WRONG

 

The special council was requested after a civilian declared a run for public office of president. Yes?

 

Sorry, your conclusion doesn't mean squat and the investigation into Trump being a Russian plant got squashed.

You're getting ready to find out as Republican's taking the house already presented their case publicly.
Maybe you should try and keep up with current events.

Sorry again. All you have is another fake media story with no evidence.
If the FBI actually secured illegal documents from Trump, they would have charged him with a crime.

Nope, but Trumps documents are not provided to the public and the public did not have access to those documents
Try again

If you don't know who writes the laws governing classifications and what they say, maybe you should find another website to post leftist gibberish
Maybe FaceBook

If you don't know its wasn't a loan
If you don't know its an SEC approved and reported investment.
If you don't know it was 6 months after leaving office
Then I suggest you get up to speed on current events
Or you can continue to post CNN gibberish to get called out on.

Before Giving Billions to Jared Kushner, Saudi Investment Fund Had Big Doubts
Six months after leaving the White House, Jared Kushner secured a $2 billion investment from a fund led by the Saudi crown prince
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/10/us/jared-kushner-saudi-investment-fund.html

 

They've forwarded nothing significant. If they had such information they would have made legitimate news with it rather than all the grandstanding and show trial antics.

Makes perfect sense to reasonable people. You can choose not to be that if you want and that is your choice.

 

We got him now!!!! (100th time).

Interestingly, the left's obsession and crying wolf over Trump may result in a Republican president being elected in 2024.

 

It has zero credibility. You are imagining things.

 

Of course you think that...lol

 

Comey said he initially described Clinton's handling of classified information as "grossly negligent." He said he changed that because it was a legal term and it was not his place to make a legal judgment. But it was his place to use a legal term since he was wearing two hats, one as the FBI Director and the second as the AG when Lynch recused herself after having a wrongful meeting with Bill Clinton. That's a fishy story that's been covered extensively on this forum. Because we know Clinton improperly stored classified information on a private server located in her home and sent and received classified information from that server it was clear evidence Clinton did improperly store and transmit classified information. This is aside from the intent to store classified information. It is what she did that made it a felony.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/heres-why-james-comey-didnt-recommend-prosecution-for-hillary-clinton/

"There is a lower standard that the FBI director mentioned, however, which is that of gross negligence. "Our investigation looked at whether there is evidence classified information was improperly stored or transmitted on that personal system, in violation of a federal statute making it a felony to mishandle classified information either intentionally or in a grossly negligent way," Comey said Tuesday.

"Just sending between Clinton and her staff might not meet the standard," he added.