LOLZ at Trump being a "victim" of the housing bubble. Oh pleeeeeze. Trump was a victim of his own greed and ignorance. He borrowed billions of dollars, and couldn't pay it back. Unlike the real victims of the housing bubble--the people who lost everything, including their jobs--Trump got to keep his personal assets (well he lost his yacht, but really--a man who borrows billions of dollars and promises to pay it back shouldn't be buying yachts until he pays back his loans--which he didn't.) As for my "obsession" with Trump: I detest the man and truly believe that he will be the straw that breaks this country's back. Should I just shut-up. By the way, when was the last time you posted about something other than Trump--and all of it fawning adoration of the comb over. As for Hillary 'ruining the lives of millions of people', your republican pals were up to their necks in the housing bubble debacle. I didn't see any of them screaming for Wall Street to stop. Instead, many of them were whining about too many banking regulations. By the way, Trump will deregulate the banks even further, and the Wall Street bankers will squeal in delight. You keep calling me "dude". I am a not.
And whose favor do you hope to gain thru the Sorcery of cursing and misrepresenting the man? You only destroy your own credibility.
Seriously? The debt is skyrocketing, exceeding $20 trillion, the middle class is disappearing, the median wages are dropping, the gap between the rich and the rest is astronomical.... That's been going on while both parties were in the White House, while both parties had majorities in the congress.... And you actually advocate more of the same, keeping the same exact people who are responsible for the situation because you think Trump will endanger the country, not them? Are you for real? It's just blind partisanship, not concern for the country and you know that.
Misrepresenting the man? That's a good one. If you think you can destroy my credibility by misrepresenting Trump, then show us a link that proves Trump didn't say what he said in 06. Show us a link that proves he isn't guilty of what he did to thousands of people with his fake university. Destroy my credibility by proving Politifact didn't label him the Liar of the year. All these things I claimed and proved. Now it's your turn to show where my credibility is lost.
The amount of riches is not directly relative to a wealthy-man's intellect. I takes little intellect to set up shell foundations and funnel money underhanded to liberal, socialist and even communist political organizations especially aimed at the youth through seemingly altrustic money granting agencies set up by Soros but not directly linked. I really doubt Soros has the gray-matter to match Trump in a head-on dual 'sunlight' debate. Yea the 'Bushies' are old-school Republicans that were center-left for decades. As long as the country wasn't going to hades in a hand-basket then to maintain 'status-quo' was the most beneficial political thing to do. That all changed with Obama, now Republicans have become quite disenchanted with the 'old ways' and are moving more right-of-center. This is perceived as 'radical-right' by the media who have been used to milk-toast, conservative Republicans. The times have changed....Get used to President Trump, frankly we don't give a sh*t how you FEEL about it either.
Cons would be okay with "trying" authoritarian rule with Pol Pot, Auguste Pinochet or just about anyone as long as he agreed with their ideology. Cons have been brought up by "strict" (abusive) parents, they see being smacked around by someone as proof that they care What Sundance is suggesting is "caudilloism". It's the main governmental philosophy of most of Central and Latin America, and the major reason they remain third world (*)(*)(*)(*)holes, which is what conservatives are trying to turn the US into