I agree, it's unpresidential and unbecoming. What's going to happen with a man of Trump's lack of tact mocks Putin. He thinks he's "being tough"? No, he's inviting Russia to openly bomb the U.S or to continue to support the Assad regime or other anti-US forces, just to stick it to Trump. A President must first and foremost consider his words, and consider his actions for the best interests of the U.S. Being President isn't running a TV Show. It's taking the lives of ALL 300 million into consideration and making the best decisions possible for them(and if possible, for world advancement as well.) The President must think "What if that were my child? What world do I want my child to inherit?" And for my part, I want a President who can reach middle ground. Who can reach across the aisle, build trust and communication and can unite our country. I want a President who can reach 67% approval without a terrorist attack. Someone we can genuinely believe loves this country. That's why on the Republican Side, Marco Rubio and Carly Fiorina are my choices for the White House. Both have displayed the kind of tenacity, courage and forward thinking. On the Democratic side, Hillary scares the hell out of me but at least she doesn't believe Climate Change has a link to terrorism. If neither Rubio or Fiorina win the nomination, I'll reluctingly embrace Madam President and hope she is indeed different from the past 16 years. We can't afford 4 more years of the Bush/Obama doctrine.
Liberals keep making the same mistake over, and over again. They desperately want to see Trump either flame out, or go down in flames. When Trump speaks, the liberals find anything that they can to discredit him, but inevitably they either misrepresent what he said, or fail report on something that matters. In the case of this reporter, the liberals completely forget how liberals continuously mock Trump's appearance, and they jump right in to a classic and predictable pattern of painting a victim. They do not care what the actual content of what Trump was saying, or how it might validate his hand gestures, they only care that they may have the winning lottery ticket that could inflict damage to Trump. The mistake that liberals keep making is they fail to recognize how previous attacks have actually backfired and then fueled his campaign even more. Liberals will run with this reporter thing like clockwork, and they will fail to see how little it is related to why Trump has the highest poll numbers.
Trump benefits from the large field. Just like extreme parties did in the past in party politics. As long as the field doesn't shrink he can win. There is a large group of racists and authoritarians in the Republican base but I imagine they will lose if the field shrinks to 3-4 candidates. Trump is playing a dangerous game though. He is making a lot of enemies and I have a hard time doubting he doesn't have a lot of shady and maybe even criminal stuff in his past. That will probably start coming out.
Like clockwork, this is what liberals will be focused on. This is the strategy that liberals will attempt to use, they will screw it up, and it will keep fueling Trump's campaign. They just don't learn.
Don't know who these liberals you are so fixated about are. I actually think it will come from Republicans. They have more interest in getting rid of Trump.
The establishment Republicans and the left are all liberals. I see a member here who uses terms like "neo nazi" and "great flatu". He may be further left, but his attacks on establishment Republicans are attacks to his own club. They are all a buncha liberals who don't learn how to attack trump without helping him.
How soon you get off track from my message about how liberals keep fueling Trump with their strategy that fails over, and over, and over. Liberals get distracted very easily from a description of this failing strategy, and inevitably will start right back with making the same mistake some more.
Some folks see what they want to see. If they have to imagine it they will. This is pretty silly. To say Trump was mocking a disabled person means you would have to be a mind reader.