Don't Tell Me "They" Are Not After My Guns!

Except in your analogy someone is quite clearly after their beer.

My rights arent subject to what another "feels" is enough.

Being a detroit cop, I can see why you might feel differently.

 

Just pointing out the fruit of your labor.

 

The people who understand such infringements never stop such attacks, but ALWAYS result in less freedom for the law abiding.

It would require paying attention.

 

Real "common sense" active shooter control.
"Parkland school shooting panel backs arming teachers, rips responding deputies"
"A Florida investigative panel charged with studying the rampage that left 17 people dead at a Parkland high school last year recommended arming teachers, reigniting debate over the controversial strategy that has drawn vigorous support from President Donald Trump."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...cks-arming-teachers-rips-deputies/2470703002/

 

More "common sense" crime control from the new governor of Florida.
"Governor DeSantis suspends Broward Co. Sheriff Scott Israel for response to Parkland shooting"
BROWARD COUNTY, Fla. — Florida's new Governor Ron DeSantis announced Friday he has signed an executive order to suspend Broward County Sheriff Scott Israel for his department's response to the Parkland school shooting last year.

 

Outstanding.

 

Buying just for the sake of buying is wasteful. I'd rather stock up on ammo.

 

Not when its possible many of them won't be legal to buy in California soon. Senate dems are even trying to ban my preferred AR stocks.

Im also stocking up on ammo.

 

"limit purchases to one handgun and one long gun per 30 day period,"
I wonder how they would handle this situation. My father in law passed away and I collected the guns out of his house. There was a total of five which I acquired in a five minute period, one pistol, two shotguns and two rifles.

 

Those aren't purchases.....

 

Since they talk about "purchase or receive a firearm", I wonder if that is how they would interpret it.

 

Maybe true but right now the Democrats are not sitting in Washington plotting to take my car.

 

I guess it depends on who they are.

The UN, for example, most certainly is after our guns. "Civilian firearm ownership undermines the legitimate power monopoly of the state" according to the UN rep to 'The Great Gun Control Debate' in (iirc) Scotland some years ago. But so long as we value the Constitution here in the US, there's nothing the UN can do about it. They can greedily and jealously watch us parade around with our 'power de-monopolizers' while pontificating all they want- in the US, The People have The Power.

 

As long as the stock isn't "collapsible" I don't see any list of stock that are not allowed. I have a couple of stocks I bought and shipped no issues.

 

You would be in trouble seeing as how you purposely broke the law.

 

They already have a ban on bump stocks possession to become a felony, even though the purchase at the time included a letter from the BATF stating they are approved and legal. No compensation for owners that will be required to turn them in to the police. Estimating 500,000 in the market.

Binary Triggers are now near the top of the list.

They are currently working on SBR's that have stocks with a brace even though a letter from the BATF stated they are legal.
and provided a letter stating so.

Short barreled shotguns with a handle are being targeted. Remington and Mossberg owners be advised.

Some states the mere possession of a magazine that holds more than ten rounds is considered a felony regardless of whether they were legal one day before the new law declared them illegal. No grandfather on this one.

Hawaii has declared that they will no longer follow FEDERAL LAW allowing retired LE to carry a gun in that state with the exception they must be on duty and if in the State more than six days, the gun must be registered with the local police.

Just a few on Michael Bloombergs wet dream list all of which are being challenged and will have to work their way through the courts and hopefully wind up in the Supreme Court.

Now tell me again they are not coming after your guns.

 

Bump stocks would be a federal ban and Trump is on board with it. As far as the other stocks, as I've said, they fall under the "collapsible stock" category.

 

Since most of the hard-core NRA favors giving AR-15s to newborn babies (lest they develop a lifelong complex about having their 2A Rights violated), I don't think that you have to worry too much about your precious "guns".

 

They are plotting to take your car. Many large "progressive" cities are quickly eliminating downtown parking plus raising the parking rates to onerous levels and using the gas and license fee money to fund light rail, the train system that was ripped up from city streets for being inefficient back in the 1950's. This explains why so many bridges and roads the lefties complain about go unrepaired.
Depending on your city look for the "free" charging stations for electric vehicles that Alexandria Occasional Cortex wants to be 100% in existence in the next 15 years. In her demands she thinks this will include all over the road trucks and delivery vehicles. At no point does she give consideration as to the destruction this would do to our electrical grid and the disposable of the hazardous batteries.
So, are they coming after your cars also, think about it for a while?

 

In Canada, they can't purchase guns anymore?
You know, there are millions of guns in the US that are not registered?

 

Exactly. Just like they aren't plotting to take your guns.
You listen to boogie men and fall for their scare mongering tactics. You're being played.

 

http://www.politicalforum.com/index...t-after-my-guns.549054/page-6#post-1070096525

 

why do you care how many guns a responsible adult purchases in a year?

 

You may be right. I can also turn the table on you and suggest that ignorance is bliss.