Durham says CIA found data alleging Trump-Russia connection not 'technically plausible,' was 'user c

So your now saying the indictment and Motion to Inquire Into Potential Conflicts of Interest filed by Durham doesn't exist? I mean it's one thing to say the guy is isn't until proven guilty but he has been charged and these are specific document filed for the case.

 

Lack of rebuttal noted, it extended INTO the Trump administration as I have said all along your baseless simple dismissals notwithstanding. Do not continue to deny there is no evidence nor have you been shown any.

 

Me>> What's the lie and be specific.

Didn't think you could post one just as you can't rebut the evidence being posted.

I'll ask again and be specific.

Me↑
Reminding you of how much trouble those pesky billing records can bring as Sussman is finding out.

What's the lie and be specific.

 

What's the lie and be specific.

What did grape provide to refute what was posted and show it is a lie?

 

He lied and he was caught. The only real question is what sort of deal he'll make to avoid prison.

 

That Trump was spied on.

You seem to neglect that Durhams filing has already been picked apart based on the lies it claimed.

The biggest bing that the Trump White House was spied on. He leaves out that the data that was being mined was data from the 2016 OBAMA white house, yet the right in this country keeps trying to keep that lie alive

 

No, I am saiyng this is more bloviation from the right, and thet Durham is doing EXACTLY what he was enshrined to do which is to politically keep these lies alive

 

YEah, cause Durham is real eager to prove that in court tight. I mean its only 2 years in, and he hasnt done anything but create press releases

 

Worthy of a !

 

~ You may want to read this :

https://www.wsj.com/articles/donald...campaign-john-durham-court-filing-11644878973

 

A Swahili proverb translated: "Slowly slowly catch a monkey."

 

You may want to stay away from op-ed pieces

Durhams "indictment" has been picked apart, and its literally a lie to say that someone "hacked" the white house......

 

again this is not about legality or the law, this is 1000% politics

 

That's what the Watergate defendants said too.

 

Well when he lies outright in the indictment, its pretty telling.

Durham made the claim in the indictment that someone had "stolen data from white house servers", which was an out and out lie.

 

The state of knowledge evolves, and does not affect the central charge against Sussmann.

 

~ All political " news" is op-ed pieces. Some is fake — some is fact. See the Russia Collusion Delusion for example .

 

You may want to read this:

https://www.forbes.com/sites/nichol...ed-on-his-campaign-explained/?sh=e1f41fe3b852

 

More likely knowledge of the case was still building.

 

It keeps getting confirmed along with new evidence the same GA Tech group was helping Muller too.

Docs: Spygate Researchers Did Work For Former Special Counsel Robert Mueller

The U.S. Department of Defense and private individuals pumping the Alfa Bank hoax also assisted former Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Donald Trump for supposed collusion with Russia, newly discovered documents suggest.

The Georgia Tech researchers embroiled in the Alfa Bank hoax prepared white papers for the U.S. Department of Defense about the Democratic National Committee hack and created a “Mueller List” on the Russian intelligence agency hackers, the newly obtained documents indicate. The white papers were prepared for the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), a section of the U.S. Department of Defense....
https://thefederalist.com/2022/04/2...rk-for-former-special-counsel-robert-mueller/


Durham Motion Explains: Sussmann Peddled Purported Trump–Russia Phone Records from Trump Transition Period in Late 2016

....The revelation about EOP records is notable in light of the hue and cry from the Sussmann camp a couple of months ago. That is when Durham revealed, in another court submission, that Sussmann had peddled Internet traffic records — known as DNS (Domain Name System) data — that were derived from White House servers. Sussmann apologists claimed that Sussmann could not conceivably have tried to smear Trump with EOP Internet records drawn from 2014 into 2017 because Obama, not Trump, was president during that period. Therefore, critics contended, Durham must have been floating misinformation in an effort to prejudice the jury pool against Sussmann.

As I observed at the time, this was a mendacious contention. Trump won the election in November 2016 and, after a period of transition, took office on January 21, 2017; Sussmann’s meeting with the CIA to transmit the information cobbled together under Joffe’s direction happened on February 17, 2017. Therefore, it was obvious that there could have been White House records pertaining to Trump communications toward the end of the time frame, from 2014 through early 2017, covered in the EOP records..
https://www.nationalreview.com/corn...=river&utm_content=more-in-tag&utm_term=first

 

He billed the campaign. He and Clinton are refusing to turn over subpoenaed materials claiming attorney client privilege. Who was he working for?

 

~ It does appear that Durham 's investigation has picked apart the false statements and opinions of "news" media regarding the ' Russia Collusion Delusion ' promulgated by certain high-profile reporters . .
Now those same people are doing the same with Durham — another smear job against the facts in order to maintain the hate culture that grips what is left of their audience .

 

If the full light of this finally is allowed to shine it will change the political landscape. Biden's "plausible deniability" MO will come crashing down on a lot of Democratic heads.

 

But thats in the indictment. You dont build a case AFTER the indictment !

 

House majority leader to colleagues in 2016: ‘I think Putin pays’ Trump

Maybe Durham is just looking in the wrong places.
Talking to the wrong people.
Then again, his job is to prove Trump is innocent. Not find the truth.