Ed Klein says Hillary cried all night; blamed Comey and Obama for her loss.

Of course she cried, she could face jail time.

 

Odd how you think you should pay a lower tax rate than anyone else.

 

Yes, they are still suckling babies

 

I disagree

- - - Updated - - -

where did I say that? better read it again, I want the multi-billionaires to pay at least as much tax per dollar they earn as I do......

.

 

give it up already, she committed no crimes, time to let that go....

 

I voted straight democrat, if there was a dead man on the ticket, I woudl of voted for him, same as republicans that vote straight ticket... who cares

...

 

The thing about the emails that I thought from the beginning was she should have just said, "How the hell do I know. Someone else takes care of all that crap for me. I have more important things to do and doing computers is not one of them." It was something that most everybody in America could have related to.

 

Running or endorsing dead candidates is an old Democrat tactic depending on a large number of low information voters.

What happened in the city of Oceanside one of the candidates died before the election but the city council kept the news under the radar and even told the low information voters to vote for the dead man. If the dead man wins, then the city council gets to pick who their city treasure will be. -> http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/.../dead-man-elected-office-california/93581180/

Back in 1998 L.A. County Sheriff Block died before the seeking the reelection in the November elections. The L.A. County Supervisors told the low information voters to vote for the dead Sheriff so the County Supervisors who were all liberal Democrats except could pick their own PC Sheriff. They even increased running reelect Sheriff Block commercials on television. -> http://articles.latimes.com/1998/oct/30/news/mn-37650

If Hillary were have to won, after eight more years of open borders there would have been enough low information voters in America by 2024 that the DNC could run FDR for President and likely he would win. And if the Democrats controlled Congress, they would pick who the next President would be ignoring the American people.

 

winners are grinners...and a new broom always sweeps pretty clean...Trump will shake the crap out of
America and the USA will be great again....

 

I'm just wondering if Obama will pardon her.

 

she committed no crime, so no pardon needed

 

Are you advocating equal tax rates for all sources of income, for all citizens

 

She committed no crimes for which Obama will pardon her for.

 

The rich don't pay for redistribution policies. The middle class does.

 

The Democrat Party has been decimated on Obama's watch:
~
The biggest stain on Barack Obama’s political legacy may turn out to be the decimation of the Democratic Party on his watch.

The 2016 election has brought a moment of reckoning — and a new era to the party.

Democrats have been shut out of power in Washington, with the White House and both chambers of Congress in GOP control starting in January. In state houses across the country, their ranks have been decimated. …

What is undeniable, however, is that there has been a systematic erosion of Democratic power during Obama’s eight years in office.
~
https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/national/obama-legacy/

But this didn't start in 2016, it started in 2010. The Left demonized the Tea Party into monsters and then finally the nation backed Trump. Had the Left listened in the midterms rather than screaming and plugging their ears, their would have been no Trump. Had Obama not played games with his birth certificate and then savaged Trump at the WH correspondents dinner (when many say Trump made the decision to run the Presidency) with Trump in attendance, we would be viewing the aftermath of a different election.

The Electorate sent a massive wave of backlash in 2010 stripping Dems of the House. Where Bill Clinton “triangulated” after his midterm backlash, Obama dug in, and aided by a national media painted his political opponents as ignorant rubes and racists. Once again, Republicans rode a midterm wave that pollsters largely missed in 2014 to strip them of control of the Senate.

Still Dems didn’t listen. Neither did the media. This election was the result of not listening to the voters in the midterms. This election was about all lies around ObamaCare.
~
If one wonders how the electorate got this angry, angry enough to elect Donald Trump, ObamaCare is a great case in point. Consider the pattern of Democratic disaster that unfolded after its passage in March 2010. Democrats lost the House in 2010 over it, then lost the Senate in 2014 largely on the same issue (among a few others). Obama has now presided over the loss of Democratic control over the White House, both chambers of Congress, a record number of state legislatures, and after last night, even more gubernatorial offices. Maybe refusing to deal realistically with popular opposition to government-run insurance markets had something to do with that, eh?

And then there’s the Senate. Before the start of this election cycle, the Democrats had licked their chops at the prospect of control in the upper chamber, where the GOP had to defend 24 seats to just 10 for Democrats. They drafted old warhorses like Evan Bayh and Russ Feingold to rally voters to their standards, and most media outlets focused their analysis on whether the change in Senate control would lead to an easy ride for President Hillary Clinton even if the GOP held the House. All Democrats needed was to flip four Senate seats, and the field brimmed with vulnerable incumbents and open spots.

Instead, Democrats only converted two opportunities — in Illinois and New Hampshire, giving them just 48 seats in the upper chamber. Bayh and Feingold didn’t just lose; they got blown out. Republican Sen. Pat Toomey eked out a win at about the same margin as Trump won in Pennsylvania. GOP Sens. Roy Blunt and Richard Burr will still be around in 2017.

Those losses in supposedly easy-opportunity races don’t just reflect Trump’s surprising political strength. They demonstrate the depth of the passion against the establishment — and that includes the media. Three weeks ago, I wrote that the election system wasn’t “rigged” against Trump, but media bias against him and Republicans in general had become painfully obvious. In the final month of the election, the same media picked up every attack line from Clinton in an attempt to shame voters into acquiescing to their worldview. Voters finally answered in the most direct way possible.
~
And who is on the Democrat Bench?

 

Trumpers are in full regret mode.

 

distanced herself from Obama? If anything he helped her garner more votes.

She lost because she failed to get the same support from certain demographics he did in key battle ground states. Her loss is her fault, not Obama's.

- - - Updated - - -

Not sure about that. After all, Trump loves the uneducated.

- - - Updated - - -

And you think the rubes at Trump rallies with their red hats screaming "drain the swamp!" are high information voters? Heh.

 

It wasn't the uneducated who put Trump into the White House but the well informed Americans. Those who are knowledgeable.

That's where the left gets it wrong. They think someone with a BA in liberal arts are better educated but most people with a BA aren't to knowledgeable. Basically low information.

 

Whatever makes you sleep at night champ.

 

yes, search my alias and flat tax, I am for a flat tax where everyone pays the same percent tax for every dollar earned over the poverty level (all income treated as income equally)

.

 

He made it up, just like he made all the rest of it up, and Breitbart paid him to do it.

 

Yes, I already made that clear.

 

And you'd be wrong. The exit polls show this.