Election Fraud Deniers Will Have a Hard Time Shrugging Off This ‘Never-Before-Seen Surveillance Vide

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by XXJefferson#51, Feb 1, 2022.

  1. Zorro

    Zorro Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2015
    Messages:
    77,534
    Likes Received:
    52,098
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Damn straight. And don't you ever forget it.
     
  2. Bowerbird

    Bowerbird Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2009
    Messages:
    93,186
    Likes Received:
    74,486
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Female
  3. Patricio Da Silva

    Patricio Da Silva Well-Known Member Donor

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2020
    Messages:
    32,581
    Likes Received:
    17,503
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Gender:
    Male

    Debunked, point by point

    https://www.reuters.com/article/fac...-2020-u-s-presidential-election-idUSL2N2XJ0OQ

    The documentary “2000 Mules” does not provide any concrete, verifiable evidence of widespread voter fraud in the 2020 election. Technology and election integrity experts consulted by Reuters also did not find the geolocation, surveillance or any other information presented showed plausible evidence of fraud.


    https://apnews.com/article/2022-mid...alth-arizona-e1b49d2311bf900f44fa5c6dac406762

    Just one example:

    CLAIM: In Philadelphia alone, True the Vote identified 1,155 “mules” who illegally collected and dropped off ballots for money.

    THE FACTS: No, it didn’t. The group hasn’t offered any evidence of any sort of paid ballot harvesting scheme in Philadelphia. And True the Vote did not get surveillance footage of drop boxes in Philadelphia, so the group based this claim solely on cellphone location data, its researcher Gregg Phillips said in March in testimony to Pennsylvania state senators.


    And on and on and on this documentary is bunko.


     

Share This Page