Every House Democrat Voted To Crush The Dreams Of Women Athletes With The Ironically-Named ‘Equality

You can believe all those things if you wish, of course. I disagree.

The empirical fact that the Democratic Party is far more diverse than the Republican Party, in gender and race, is not judgmental.

It is the objective reality and, in the political realm under self-governance, diversity that better reflects the electorate is desirable. A party that boasts a high percentage of any single race and/or gender is not representative of the populace, and increasingly unsustainable.

 

That's exactly what's happening. Women are literally getting their skulls crushed in the name of leftist "equality".



The absolute state of the left.

 

If you can't accept the empirical data from any particular source, a preponderance of alternative sources will readily confirm it for you.

 

Which technology?

 

Women, increasingly, are the Democratic Party by choice, even if some angry white guys are upset by it.

 

But none you're willing to provide? Much easier for to me to assert my suspicions were right. The caption was phony.

 

Why are you fixated on race and gender?
Are you a racist sexist?

 

the technology trans use to change gender parts, I do not know what it is called

 

equality is something most people want in the area of jobs and service... sports.... that is one discrimination most have accepted when it comes to genders (left and right)

 

Gonna give them a Y chromosome and delete the X ?

 

maybe someday, never know where technology is headed

some are born with both genitalia

 

But that's not part of the gender confusion that is being discussed. Neither was the carribean point mutation that you brought up.
In fact, no genetic component has been discovered for that

 

What is just as female?
Do physical parts determine gender? It appears that is NOT the case.

It can determine the sexual organs of one, but that isn't wholly a gender.

 

Because it doesn't exist. The only way to have a vagina is to be born with one - same with a penis. Why don't you know this?
Creating a cavity in a man's body is not creating a vagina except in the poor bedeviled liberal mind.

 

Wow. Might it be that you cannot accept a direct quotation from a Republican senator stating the obvious because you don't like it?

If you only trust ideological entertainers like Rush Limbaugh, Alex Jones, Laura Ingraham, Lou Dobbs, Ann Coulter, and Dinesh D'Sousa, you'll end up with crap like Cesar "False Flag!" Sayoc in your noggin. (See https://www.weeklystandard.com/andrew-egger/the-arrest-of-bomber-cesar-sayoc-and-the-false-flag-conservatives)

Don't let them take you for a ride!

​

Graham's well-known observation is not some Chinese hoax like climate change, doncha know. It has been accurately cited by sources left, right, and center.

https://freedomoutpost.com/why-does-south-carolina-keep-voting-for-lindsey-graham/
https://www.outsidethebeltway.com/running-out-of-angry-white-guys/
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2018/12/11/republicans-cant-generate-enough-angry-white-guys/
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...t-crowd-boos-shouts-quot-Ron-Paul!-quot/page2
https://washingtonmonthly.com/2016/03/04/were-not-generating-enough-angry-white-guys/
https://www.cnbc.com/id/49722937
http://www.quoteswave.com/picture-quotes/440371
https://www.azquotes.com/author/5782-Lindsey_Graham
etc., etc., etc.

 

From a dictionary.

con·serv·a·tive
/kənˈsərvədiv/
adjective

1. 1.
   holding to traditional attitudes and values and cautious about change or innovation, typically in relation to politics or religion.
   synonyms: traditionalist, traditional, conventional, orthodox, stable, old-fashioned, dyed-in-the-wool, unchanging, hidebound; More
   
   • 
     
   • 
     

noun

1. 1.
   a person who is averse to change and holds to traditional values and attitudes, typically in relation to politics.

 

You lose.

 

The human life, actually, most every animal life, has a broad spectrum between what one might call full female to what one might call full male.

I've asked dozens of times to define full male or female. The only answer one can give is physical body parts. Which determines what sex organs one has. Which isn't what gender one actually is in rare cases.
It gets so mixed up in rare cases, some people end up with both sets of sex organs. This alone should be a huge hint that there is not clean cross, ie BINARY, between male to female.

 

One could just look at the makeup of Congress of the GOP vs the D party.
1 party is without a doubt more reflective of the overall makeup of the USA, and one party is mostly white male.

 

Wow, he lost 2X in a matter of minutes.
But, his back is red for that self patting.

 

but it was what you asked, things like that come up in a topic like this

 

we ask the same question of Republicans, every time Trump opens his mouth.

 

today that may be true... if God wanted man to fly he would of gave him wings was once said too

 

Yep, sex is really complex and murky if you have a degree in gender studies. For the people who have a degree in biology, it is pretty straightforward. Wonder how long it will before the lunatics take over the biology departments and start erasing the established empirical science...