Isn't God belief why the Nazi soliders had "Gott Mit Uns" on their belt buckles? Or was that just a reminder to wear their gloves when invading Russia?
Who are "they?" Christians or Atheists? Bot use faith to believe in what they feel. Christians who believe we live under God's Commandments and Laws will not cast aside the value of each human being born or unborn. At least they should not cast them aside. Atheists believe in a fluent changing of morality based upon individual feelings. Makes it easy to shoot up a grocery store killing anyone they want to. To them, murder is not an immoral act. Mao, Stalin, Hitler all used the same Atheistic thinking to justify the killing of 100 million people in the 20th century. Liberal Democrats use the same belief of an unborn human being to justify the killing of an innocent being who has no choice in the matter. I was watching "The Good Doctor" Monday night and Dr. Murphy and his live-in girlfriend were trying to decide whether to end the pregnancy because of personal interference of a baby in their lives. Never gave a thought of what the baby's choice of them being its parents. 60 million babies slaughtered since Roe v Wade under the liberal atheist belief that before birth, they are not human beings with choices.
Except of course for when God wills it, as people killing in his name (or him himself killing in the bible stories) say he does. History is full of God being claimed to oppose the basic human value of many different people (and also been claimed to support that value), ranging from slavery, to Manifest Destiny over “savage” First Nations people, to women’s liberation, and to gay marriage. People claiming to Christians have stood against all of these people in their request to be treated fairly and equally. So do Christians as demonstrated above. Most such killers are not atheists. I have yet to personally hear an atheist tell me killing is not an immoral act. I can’t say the same for Christians. Was God immoral to drown people during the flood, kill Job’s family, or order Abraham to kill Isaac? How about slaughtering the first born sons of Egypt? I bet you somebody here in this very thread will say that is all excusable. Also, pro-life atheists exist, believe it or not.
There is evidence. Plenty of evidence. You just refuse to see it. There is recent evidence of Evolution. There's a new reptile species that evolved and there are documented accounts of bacteria evolving.
I most certainly can. And you do it too if you decide to worship this God. Saying "God is Good" is a judgment. And what's more, the God worshiped says a lot about the believer. If you believe in a hippy dippy God loves everyone sort of God, that tells me something about you. If you believe in a vengeful fire and brimstone judgmental God, that tells me something very different about you. Why do you believe these people when they say they speak for God?
No by far and away the majority of abortions are had by Christians, sorry it is your god fearing Christians who want abortions, not the atheist bogeymen! In 2011, the Guttmacher Institute reported that two out of three women having abortions in the U.S. identified as Christian.[126] The same report said that of all U.S. abortions, 37% were undertaken by women who identified as Protestant, and 28% were Catholic https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christianity_and_abortion#:~:text=In 2011, the Guttmacher Institute,, and 28% were Catholic.
Have and it does not comply with completing the Scientific Theory. Your video is okay, but doesn't prove that Evolution is nothing more than a pipe dream that people have faith in, that is only Faith Based.
I agree totally. So... If you believe that - provide what they explained to say Evolution is nothing more than Faith Based? Faith Based falls under Hypothesis - but people believe it truth more that a theory or law. I agree, thank you for giving this to the masses for them to understand EXACTLY why I think the way I do!
They did not. Dogs and wolves can breed and have offspring. Please look up the definition of evolution. I think it is different from what you think, and the scientific world
Good GRAVY what is this. Could you PLEASE... Please take it down a notch and discuss without over doing it. Please.
Dogs are descendants of ancient wolves. Several splits in genetic evolution in different epochs eventually led to the DNA of modern dogs.
Evolution is different than what the scientific world thinks? I suppose, if one is just making stuff up. Or are you a scientist trying to prove the theory of evolution wrong? If so, what are your credentials?
I have to question his definition of "Facts." When looking at the origins of the universe, we are observing the past in which we were not there. So, we have to make some conclusions that may not be factual at all. They may only be hypothesis or theories based on bad interpretations of our observations. Experiments can be used to try and convince ourselves or others of what we perceive are the facts. However, evolutionists or old universe believers refuse to accept other explanations that would change their "Facts." That's being myopic. And that's a fact!
If you refuse to accept this expiation then you are being myopic!! = https://www.cs.williams.edu/~lindsey/myths/myths_13.html
Interesting how the actual creation took place as outlined in Genesis changed over time. Most likely, like a joke one tells in a crowded room and by the time it circulates around the room, it comes back much changed. Fortunately, God spoke to Moses and the correct creation was restored in the book of Genesis in the Bible. In which the creation can be shown to be factual based on science.
Actually, it does...As stated by you and others, science doesn't prove truth or false. It just presents information through experimentation. It's up to others to interpret the information. And, there is plenty of creationist PhD scientists that have successfully interpreted the information in favor of Genesis. Those who cannot allow this will object without caring about truth. If you are gay, you cannot allow this because it would destroy the theory of people being born gay.
"Creation science" is an oxymoron. It only uses whatever evidence it can find (even if the evidence doesn't actually support it) and ignores or excuses conflicting evidence. Real science doesn't make excuses for evidence. There is a reason why creationist organizations have a tough time getting real scientists on board, and instead are relegated to using mostly failed hacks, because there isn’t a scientific underpinning to creationist claims.
Excellent finally a Christian who can provide a link to the Creationist Theory for diversity of life on earth. I have asked for years for a Christian to provide this to me, lets hope you are the one that can do it.