Explosive balloon found in kindergarten in Zionist Occupied Palestine

You mean you cannot explain it, because you do not understand it.
As you do not understand the text you continue to quote, you cannot explain how the West Bank, under the treaty, does not belong to Israel.

 

Again you result to trying to tell other posters what they mean!

The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognized international boundary between Jordan and Israel, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967.

No matter what you say or try you cannot alter the words of the treaty, it really is as simple as that!

 

You cannot explain your quoted text, because you do not understand it.
As you do not understand the text you continue to quote, you cannot explain how the West Bank, under the treaty, does not belong to Israel.

 

The text explains it, I am not here to educate you, further you have been shown where Jordan ceded the West Bank in 1988, which you continue to ignore. Keep at it, my response will not change!

The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognized international boundary between Jordan and Israel, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967.

 

You do not possess the knowledge to educate me on the matter.
This is proven by the fact you cannot explain your quoted text, because you do not understand it.
As you do not understand the text you continue to quote, you cannot explain how the West Bank, under the treaty, does not belong to Israel.

 

Again false claims about other posters and quote mining. I would however agree with you that I cannot educate you, but not for the reason you state and as I have stated I will not even try.
The answers you seek are in the posts where you have been shown where Jordan ceded in 1988 and in the treaty of 1994,

The boundary, as set out in Annex I (a), is the permanent, secure and recognized international boundary between Jordan and Israel, without prejudice to the status of any territories that came under Israeli military government control in 1967.

 

Israel has not annexed the West Bank.

it is Occupied Territory, under the jurisdiction of the 1907 Hague Regulations, as per the Israeli Supreme Court.

you have no idea what you're talking about on this matter

 

LOL....now you're just trolling.

we have explained this to you a 1,000 times, you just refuse to listen

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banu_Qurayza
In 627, when the Quraysh and their allies besieged the city in the Battle of the Trench, the Qurayza initially tried to remain neutral but eventually entered into negotiations with the besieging army, violating the pact they had agreed to years earlier.[8] Subsequently, the tribe was charged with treason and besieged by the Muslims commanded by Muhammad.[9][10]

According to Islamic traditions, the Qur'an briefly refers to the incident in Surah 33:26,[15] yet it is historically doubtful whether the Qur'an really refers to this event. Muslim jurists have looked upon Surah 8:55-58 as a justification of the treatment of the Banu Qurayza, arguing that the Qurayza broke their pact with Muhammad, and thus Muhammad was justified in repudiating his side of the pact and killing the Qurayza en masse.


And the Jews never held any trials for the 100.000's of Muslims. They just kicked them out and by law banned them to return due to their ethnic background. And so the Jew ethnic cleansed and thieved around, and voted in apartheid rule to legally justify it. It's part of the Jew believe to thieve and steal, to even commit a massacre to get their hands on the land of Canaan. Hence they put their babies at the front line of fresh ethnically cleansed land, and complain when they are in danger there. Where folks like you support their ridiculous war criminal ways.

 

My source changed that so called fact of yours.

 

You're not in any position at all to question the findings of an exceptionally highly esteemed scientific paper called Nature, buddy.

 

Why are you posting that BS.You have not said a thing about the incident, what led up to it, and how it was resolved.
Post from Taburi, not the Qur'an.
The Qur'an explains nothing.

 

Well then why did you bother posting a BS claim at all.
You posted from a book the information is not in.

 

You came up with Jews in Saudi Arabia as if that was on par with the Muslims in Israel.
I sourced the Jew committed high treason during a war and got a trial.
Something the Muslims did or got in Israel.

And so your comparison is total BS.
The Jew simple ethnically cleanses and thieves the land of Canaan, as such it is taught in the Torah to do. The Jew God justifies war crimes. Something you defend here all the time. Modern norms, like stand your ground and the 2nd amendment support the idea to kill those who ethnically cleanse.

 

As you do not understand the text you continue to quote, you cannot explain how the West Bank, under the treaty, does not belong to Israel.

 

No you did not source it. There was no war, Muhammed was raiding.
Muhammed de-humanized the Jews, and blamed them for everything.
Hell, they even said meat would not decay if it was not for the Jews.
You posted numbers from the Qur'an that say nothing about it.

The Qur'an is not a source.
The information is in Taburi, not the Qur'an.

 

You're delusional. It's clearly about breaking treaties, betrayal and that Allah doesn't like traitors.
https://quran.com/8/55-58
And since you're dishonest about your claim, that not founded on anything, while also derailing the thread.....

I'll be still reminding you of:
So we're still stuck with the Jew, and their war criminal religion that supports even genocide to thieve the land of Canaan. Hence the Jew ethnic cleanses across their border in the WB, and puts their babies there on the front line. Something you defend here all the time. Modern norms, like stand your ground and the 2nd amendment support the idea to kill those who ethnically cleanse.

 

Again false claims and quote mining.

 

No, you really need to read the book.
Muhammed made excuses to raid and kill people.
Muhammed ordered the jizya from everyone,
Many refused to pay it, so he killed them.
There were no treaties.

Show me a treaty.


Use a little common sense.
Nobody was fighting anyone before Muhammed.
Enter Muhammed, documented in 78 raids, on unarmed, and lightly armed,
settlements and caravans.
all these people suddenly broke treaties huh.

 

I already sourced the book and proved I'm right.

That's taxation, and totally irrelevant to the thread / pushing the goalpost / derailing the thread.

I already sourced they had a pact.

So we're still stuck with the Jew, and their war criminal religion that supports even genocide to thieve the land of Canaan. Hence the Jew ethnic cleanses across their border in the WB, and puts their babies there on the front line. Something you defend here all the time. Modern norms, like stand your ground and the 2nd amendment support the idea to kill those who ethnically cleanse.

 

No matter how much you whine about it, You sourced nothing.
I told you where the source was.


show me the treaty.
Just saying they had one is no good.
anyone can say that.
Especially when information is written on the subject.


78 raids dude,..... 78 of them....78

They all broke treaties, huh,

 

did Israel annex the West Bank? no.

does Israeli civilian law apply in the West Bank? no.

does Israeli military law apply in the West Bank? yes.

did the Israeli Supreme Court declare that the West Bank is Occupied Territory, and under the jurisdiction of the 1907 Hague Regulations? yes.



you...aint...got...****...bro

 

the Muslim God and the Jewish God are the same God.

 

That's arguable.

when the Jews had the God, they were the chosen people.

The Muslim God wants to kill them.

 

Neither actually exist, or any gods of the Abrahamic faiths, can we get back to the real world and take your religious nonsense to the religious threads where they belong.