Fed Up Princeton Students Fight Back Against Black Lives Matter Terrorists’ Demands

What privileged status and who are they denying?

 

Will spoiled, pubescent children work? Most of these students, black and white, are taking up spaces in colleges that should be reserved for those with potential. Their demands are indicative of their intellectual mentality.

.

 

Because for the left, intimidation, slander, and threats are free speech, unless the other side does it.

 

What you are saying may be politically correct, but IMO it doesn't match reality. IMO a small employer that gets a bad gut feeling from a candidate's name is unlikely to hire them.

I don't know if it is a current trend or not, but would not be surprised if the irrational-feeling and sounding BLM demonstrations on top of the anti-police demonstrations and murders had not made it one in the minds of small employers. The increased awareness of international Muslim terrorism in this country would only add to this wariness.

IMO the name a person is given is potentially indicative of the mindset they grew up with, and in certain locations and situations name discrimination could be rational. In portions of the country where racist black demonstrations have been going on, a small employer may not wish to take a chance on someone with an ethnic name, even to the point of having them come in for an interview. They could fear--and it could be a rational fear--that a "black" person with a Muslim name might target them if they do not get hired, or instigate numerous time-consuming "human rights" hassles if hired. Small businesses are not equipped to put up with that sort of thing; it is the difference between making a profit and going out of business. No one wants to hire a potential troublemaker, and ethnic-sounding names right now, particularly Muslim ones, spell trouble.

Look up various names on Google and scan some of the entries.

If a parent wants to make a political point by naming a child a certain name, and the recipient of that name chooses to keep it as an adult, there could be political meanings and also economic consequences to that. With some people, IMO, an ethnic Muslim name on a native American spells "political agitator" or worse. I personally was amazed that Obama was able to win the Presidency with his name. IMO he was able to do so because he is an extremely likeable person and was able to generate massive publicity to counter it. Additionally, he had family reasons for the name he had; it was not a conscious rejection of American society the way many ethnic names seem to be.

Names are within individual control, as many have shown by changing them and doing better in their careers, especially in the entertainment industry. IMO it's up to the carriers of trigger names if they wish to continue to carry them to make a political point they may not themselves have chosen, or to pay the economic costs of having such a name in a country where that name causes others to become wary. It is certainly easy enough to front a name with one that is more usual, and keep the other names as initials, as many Chinese and other ethnic group have done for years. People who do not do this IMO are making a conscious, economic choice, and that choice is incompatible with being a trouble-free employee.

Last names do not seem to feel as problematic. They are less of a choice, and therefore do not seem to cause the same wary reactions.

 

I hope that was a joke like SNL

 

I'm talking about the people who attack others as they study in the library. What should I call them?

 

rich kids will get into any school they want, cause their parents have the $$$, your never going to be able to change that as universities will always make exceptions for them

 

I thought you were talking about everyone that qualified for the "safe spaces", that is why saying "people who attack others as they study in the library" rather then "Animals' would of made clear what you meant

even, "the animals that who attack others as they study in the library", were not mind readers

 

Nope. It's hilarious, but not a joke.

 

All I can do is laugh at this...So a counter argument is an attempt to prevent BLM??

You only make this course of action even more relevant...

 

Quite the opposite. The modus operandi of BLM is to move in, silence all opposition, and make foolish demands.

 

You can call them racist morons that object to education and believe beating on drums will somehow affect those that WANT an education instead of going to college to protest.

The BLM tactics make me laugh...

 

FOX isn't exactly role modeling rational discourse, either.

At least in the depicted debate, people were taking (clocked) turns and not talking over each other.

 

Fair enough.

 

That seems like a good strategy against racists.

- - - Updated - - -

That's how reactionaries work. They attempt to react against and resist the forces of change in society.

- - - Updated - - -

The other side has the establishment reactionaries who oppose resist and react to changes in society.

- - - Updated - - -

The privilege of status, power and money of the establishment. They are denying democratic and rightful social change.

 

Bullying and calling blacks that dont agree with them not-black is rightrul social change to you??? Isnt anyone going to an ivy league school "Establishment" by default? How is the tactic of intimidation Democracy?

 

Well, that explains it.

You're a Marxist and you think you know everything.

The danger with many who follow that philosophy is that they are so attached to the process of change, they don't take the time to look around and see the actuality.

Let's do a little test:

Specifically and exactly, in detail, explain just what the goal of the BLM is.

By the way--in Democratic societies, change occurs at the ballot box, not through destructive mobs and intimidation.

 

You mean like opposing the lefts attempt to silence free speech?

 

You obviously did not read the article the students want a reasonable discussion..

The blm movement on the other hand are making unreasonable demands.

It is the demands which they are making which the students oppose not their right to speak out

 

Since when is silencing others and making foolish demands good strategy?

Their opposition are not racists. Their opposition is anyone with reasonable but different views than theirs.

You clearly do. It know what reactionaries are since the blm movement IS the classic reactionary group.

 

Look at the 13th; 14th; 15th amendment's to the Constitution;
Look at the FBI's war against the KKK in Arkansas, Mississippi, Alabama during the early 1960's Civil Right's movement.
Look at the white college student's Freedom Riders into the Jim Crowe "deep South" in support of Black voting rights. Some were murdered.
Look at the 1965 Civil Right's Act.
Look at the War on Poverty
Look at the Great Society
Look at Affirmative Action
Look at Eisenhower using the National Guard to guarantee and integrate Central HS in Little Rock, Arkansas, and by proxy every school in that racist state at the time.
Look at Kennedy doing the same using the National Guard to guarantee and integrate the University of Alabama and by proxy every school in that racist state at the time.
Look at the election in 2008, and the re-election in 2012, of a Black President, as dishonest in his hidden agenda to turn the American Republic on its ear in favor of uneducated Black's and Islamic fundamentalists. Elected by millions of Black - Youth and Reagan White Democrats (twice);
Look at BLM ending through intimidation and threats of violence and mob attacks, the appearance of a white, legitimate Presidential candidate, Bernie Sanders - note also - BLM doesn't dare try that at a Trump rally.

Look at the stated purpose of BLM's agenda to disrupt the GOP convention in 2016, while ignoring the Democratic run City Hall of Chicago, Illinois, where innocent Black grandmothers; grandfathers; parents and young children are routinely murdered in the inner city there. While Eisenhower and Kennedy didn't hesitate to use full military force to enforce a simple idea, integration of specific schools, Obama, a Black Muslim President cares little about his former workplace neighborhood, Southside Chicago. A place the National Guard should have been sent to replacing the inadequate and unmotivated Chicago Police Department, and taken control of the streets against the unemployed, uneducated, Black criminal element operating a reign of terror on a forever Democratic run American city. If BLM, why hasn't the NAACP and BLM organization (being kind calling them that), run a mega protest of the city of Chicago's lack of control of criminal blacks controlling the inner city, and terrorizing the entire Black population there?

If BLM, why have they shunned free education as a path to respectability; decided the streets and crime are a better option for them, and than set Ferguson; Baltimore ablaze protesting normal law enforcement activities to protect the citizen's when ignorant, uneducated Black criminal thugs attack police, try to kill them, than riot in protest to the legal law enforcement protections all citizens should receive?

Name me ONE person who is white that is responsible other than the shooter, for the senseless murder of those Black church members in Charleston, SC, and tell me why their lives are more important than the little 9-year old boy who was gunned down in his back yard in Chicago on July 4th in a drive by shooting, unsolved, while watching celebration fireworks, and getting a bullet to the brain from a black criminal gang?

Why is it that ONLY White America is responsible for the sad state of affairs of Black America, their lack of respect for society, their lack of education, incentive, work ethic, etc., when White America routinely and consistently lowers any and all barriers to their success, and in the process, lowers the standard needed to succeed in America, even to the point of turning the national government over to a Black savior named Obama, by white voters?

BLM is not a committee, an organization, a political party. It is a group of criminal thugs attempting to intimidate and control the normal flow of commerce, education, interface in American society, to such a low standard, and thinking they are going to replace White America as the economic engine, the education engine and the jobs creator's of this country, for their low information, performance members using terrorist - type tactics. If these were Islamics doing this, the FBI would be all over them. Regarding BLM, there are even educated White members of society who protect them and their tactics.

They think they will change America with these tactics - what they are eventually going to meet is..........bullets!

 

Reads like the Obama - Clinton - Kerry, Democratic National Committee political platform.............

 

Based on what?

 

Intellect, deduction, perspicacity and a penchant for human rights.

 

You have an inverted view of the situation. Please rethink.

- - - Updated - - -

Demanding human rights and the end of open season on blacks by police are not unreasonable demands.

- - - Updated - - -

The BLM is opposing intemperate hate speech and racism by privileged establishment scions.