Former Trump business adviser Felix Sater to testify before House panels

Typed Felix Sater into my browser, and I get a brief bio of him on the right side.... Here's a hoot...

SNIP
Other names: Felix Satter, Felix Slater, Felix Sader, Haim F Sater, Hai Ying Sater
ENDSNIP

Only the cleanest of the clean use that many aliases.... Also, how in the heck would he get away with Hai Ying Sater???

LMAO... Should be an interesting day of testimony.... Maybe not Michael Cohen interesting, but not boring either...

 

So once again investigations into citizens private lives without a probable cause or even reasonable suspicion. More witch hunts.

 

What are you rambling about?? What's a witch hunt? Do you know what one of Congresses primary duties is?

 

The obama admin busted him and flipped him lol

 

This isn’t a criminal investigation. We’re you this dramatic when the roided up baseball players were called in? Facebook?

 

Yep they trusted him....good you

 

Oh I don't know the world's best intelligence services and a special prosecutor couldn't find anything so why does he need to testify to congress again. Oh that's right hopefully he can somehow smear anything having to do with Trump. Seems fairly dang obvious to all that aren't partisan hacks.

 

Lol flipping a criminal isn’t based on trust. How naive lol

 

People commenting on Trump's ties to Russia don't know who Felix Sater is???

Unbelievable.

Felix Sater was the operator behind Bayrock investments; a shell company used to funnel Russian mob money into real estate in order to launder it.

At a time when no legit banks would lend Trump money, suddenly Russian money was pouring into Trump's real estate holdings such as Trump Soho.

You guys are just stumbling onto the real Russia story. Russian trolls and bots did not steal the election from Hillary but Trump's criminality with Russian mob money going back to the eighties is right there.

Question is, does Mueller have the mandate or political will to expose it?

 

It isn’t? Why would the govt use someokevas a witness if they don’t trust them to be honest?

 

Hmmm ... maybe Margot2 was subpoenaed and gagged by committee. She knows everthing there is to know about Sater. Margot2 says he's a delusional serial liar ... when your discussing Uranium 1. He's a coherent teller of truths if you're discussing Trump Tower Moscow though.

 

3 Bigger questions first... Are you sure Mueller has the information/proof to expose it, can he tie it to the election (Muellers mandate) and who gave Mueller the information??

I know we have Deutsche Bank subpoenas, some cooperation from Cohen, and possibly Sater talking to Mueller last year. How deep would Weisselberg be involved??

If it's not election related, even if it's proven Trump was knee-deep in the laundering, is that going to burn him with his deplorable base?

 

Cool story, why hasn't Mules indicted Sater again?

 

Except we won't be able to watch, since it's a closed hearing. However, the Democratic spectacle is no longer worth any time of day since Mueller won't issue any more indictments. Either because it's held up(Democrats last little prayer of hope, the recognition of not indicting the President) Or....or....heaven forbid it: The "orange man's" actually innocent.

We don't even need to see the Mueller report. All AG Barr has to do is publicly declare that the President was never a target of the investigation and those words will be plastered over every pro-Trump ad and the Democratic Party can't escape from it.

 

Because they make them prove it with evidence. You said in another thread Hillary will “flip”, so I guess you think trump trusts her? Lol

 

Yes I do think if they use Clinton they’ll trust her to tell the truth. Why else would the govt use them??

 

Because they can lead them in the right director or provide actual evidence...like cohens checks and recordings.

 

Really? Then what is it and what is it's purpose?

 

Oversee the OPERATIONS of the Executive Branch. What does Sater's testimony have to do with that?

 

You must have the Oversight Committee confused with the Intelligence Committee, which is who Uncle Felix will be testifying to next week...

Cool press briefing below... wish I had some fake media credentials and could sneak in... Maybe I'll say I work for Buzzfeed... they certainly don't have real press credentials...

https://intelligence.house.gov/news/documentsingle.aspx?DocumentID=619

 

In other words, dismiss the evidence because it's not what you wanted to hear. Typical Trumpster.

You make a big noise about not finding any evidence that Sater was interviewed by Mueller.

So I googled that exact question. I only got 61,100 hits.

You're going to be reduced to disputing that it's light when the sun is up if you keep parroting and believing everything that comes out of your man child fuhrer's mouth for much longer.

 

I don't think this practice is bond by political philosophies. I have see many people on this forum, from all sides of the political spectrum, make this their "go-to" act.

 

That is true. One has to be careful not to fall into that trap.

 

Yes, I dismiss a crowd sourced website that should not be viewed as being a source of facts. I further dismiss the section you identified, given the origin of the point came from Buzzfeed.

Shall we talk about the multiple lawsuits Buzzfeed has lost or is facing?

I have no doubt the liberal media machine has created lots of noise over Sater. Thanks to Google, such tunes are always brought front and center.