Fox News: Benghazi investigation, a hoax to smear Hillary

WOW, for misleading and outright false OP's I think you get the prize.

Fox News said no such thing, Shephard Smith read from a report which made no such claim as you pretend it did.

This entire OP is a lie.

 

OMG!!! your signature describes wall street Hillary supporters exactly as they are WOW, ain't that the lid calling the kettle black....

 

Wait wait wait - no new accusations or evidence was found during this investigation, and that is proof that the entire controversy is a hoax?

 

OMG!!! your signature describes wall street Hillary supporters exactly as they are WOW, ain't that the lid calling the kettle black....

 

Oh B.S. the 'press' (MSM) are died in the wool liberals pretending to be objective. I'd be willing to bet that a large majority of them actually BELIEVE their own propaganda too. The 'press' didn't seem to be grossed out at all about Bill Clinton...They told their sheep that the incident wouldn't really affect his job...When Bill's rape accusers came forward...suddenly they were a 'bimbo eruption' and Hillary said one of the accusers was a failed lounge singer. Oh they salaciously reported on those things but Bill Clinton is STILL their hero. The women be damned. So don't give me that holier than thou explanation about how the press is so 'grossed out' by a few off-color comments.

 

You wouldn't know what a Patriotic American is.....moreover none of what you just said has anything to do with the Demos and the lefts failure with this issue. Blame yourself for going with Team Hillary's talking points.

 

Try reading the thread so you can filter. This way you wont look so foolish not knowing the report came out in June.

 

Now that Benghazi has failed I guess the Republicans are going to have to pretend that Bill Clinton is running for President.

 

Oh you lean left and still can't figure out the report was released in June. Next time make sure your pail doesn't haven't holes in it. Btw lets not embellish that you can lift any heavy shovel. That would be like.....work.

Neo Cons voting for Hillary.....Imagine that. When you figure out their History. Then you can move to the next level.

 

If you put an American flag on the condom Pence would stand up and salute.

 

A banana republic is one where the leader bypasses the legal system to punish and eliminate the opposition which is exactly what Trump is promising to do.

 

The topic of this thread isn't sex.

 

Are you referring to the crook who failed to pay his small contractors, or used illegal immigrants to build his casinos and then didn't pay them, or who defrauded the Trump University students, or used his imaginary charity, which is now closed, for personal use instead of charity.

 

It was on October 23, 1983, 33 years ago, that 241 American, placed in harm's way with woefully inadequate security precautions, were killed in a terrorist attack at Marine Barracks in Beirut.

President Ronald Reagan and his Secretary of State George Shultz were never held to account.

The totals:

63 -- victims at the embassy 18-April-1983
241 - victims at the Marine barracks 23-October-1983
64 -- victims at the French barracks 23-October-1983
30 -- victims at Tyre for the Israelis 3-November-1983
398 total

Three-and-a-half months after the bombing — and after repeatedly pledging not to do so — Reagan ordered the withdrawal of all U.S. troops from Lebanon.

As Colin Powell summarized Reagan's military misadventure: "Beirut wasn’t sensible and it never did serve a purpose. It was goofy from the beginning."

Reagan and his team were very good - at PR.

None of the subsequent lethal terrorist attacks on US overseas missions - under Powell, Rice, or Clinton - approached the carnage of that inflicted on Shultz's watch.

Whether we want to selectively bury the past, one hyped matter has been painstakingly and repeatedly addressed:

The natterninnies can sheik hysterically, but the official record of Republican vendettas stands.


.

 

Do you really think all those Republican pretend hearings were motivated by respect for the people who died?

 

"Stand down."

"Mission accomplished."

"Pull it."

The list goes on and on and on.

 

I remember........

 

For some, discrediting formidable political opponents by accusing them of criminal activities without concern for proper adjudication is the desperate ploy to which they resort.

Incarcerating political rivals is the tactic employed in a number of corrupt and backward nations, and some in America wish to emulate the practice.


Others prefer our respect for law and order under the US Constitution.

 

Lol....You got that from trump eanting to enforce our current laws? Meanwhile you support someone operating above our laws. Too funny the way you guys on the left actually think. Its fascinating actually. You can see the cultist ar work.

 

We should remember them all, and not disinter any of them in a frenzy of hyper-partisan fanaticism that dishonors both them and us.




.

 

Only you can explain that "left" that festers in your noggin, but, if you amuse yourself with it, have at it, by all means.

 

I hope that you do not experience stress incontinence when I break the news to you that we respect the rule of law in America.

Shrieking "Lock her up! Lock her up!" is not the way we deal with formidable political opponents.

When repeated investigations have failed to uncover criminal activity that merits any indictments, most of us do not become hysterical and indulge ourselves in a tantrum, insisting that our targets should be incarcerated anyway.

Some do, but truly patriotic Americans abide by our Constitution.

.

 

Really.....then you must not pay to much attention to the State Dept OIG who ruled that Hillary Broke Federal Law and Protocols.

You say you respect the rule of law and are a Clinton follower.



18 U.S. Code § 2071 - Concealment, removal, or mutilation generally.....

a) Whoever willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing, filed or deposited with any clerk or officer of any court of the United States, or in any public office, or with any judicial or public officer of the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

(b) Whoever, having the custody of any such record, proceeding, map, book, document, paper, or other thing, willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, falsifies, or destroys the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both; and shall forfeit his office and be disqualified from holding any office under the United States. As used in this subsection, the term “office” does not include the office held by any person as a retired officer of the Armed Forces of the United States.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 795; Pub. L. 101–510, div. A, title V, § 552(a), Nov. 5, 1990, 104 Stat. 1566; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(I), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)....snip~

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2071


Hillary.....willfully and unlawfully conceals, removes, mutilates, obliterates, or destroys, or attempts to do so, or, with intent to do so takes and carries away any record, proceeding, map, book, paper, document, or other thing.....and that's just in the first sentence.

Oh yeah, you and the Cult of Clinton.....really have respect for the rule of law.

Now.....promise you wont do anything to hurt yourself. Despite the bubble getting popped repeatedly. Promise?

 

Shep is the FOX token liberal and always acts as a clinton- obama apologist, nothing new here

 

No, I have not said that I am a "follower" of any politician despite your false accusation.

Whether any politician has broken the law is not for me to determine, no matter what my political inclinations.

Those charged with enforcing the law investigate such matters, and make their determination whether to indict based upon evidence they uncover, if any.

Partisan Republicans have repeatedly attempted to find sufficient cause to issue such indictments, and have failed.

None has ever been issued.

Some may fantasize that they have not properly discharged their sworn responsibilities, but there is also legal recourse for those who believe that is the case.