Gaddafi on the eve of victory

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Fedor Yakovlev: Gaddafi on the eve of victory
Excuse me, please. I am a bad translator from Russian. But I hope that the basic idea of this paper will be clear to you.

The fact that the combined operation of NATO forces in Libya deafening failed long ago it is no secret. Three months of relentless bombing of civilian Libyan cities, more than ten thousands of bombing, thousands of tons of bombs dropped, released dozens of multi-winged missiles "Tomahawk" ... and all for nothing. Moreover, currently NATO's "protectors of civilians" is much further from his goal of overthrowing Gaddafi than three months ago when they first started their "peacekeeping" operations under the pompous name of "Dawn of the Odyssey" (Odyssey Dawn), although at present for this operation is much better suited a simpler but more accurate and powerful title - "The Decline of NATO."
UN Security Council resolution number 1973, under which allegedly is the operation through wedged in her vague statement of acceptance of certain "any action" has become a byword as an example of blatant transgressions of international authorizing the start of any unprovoked aggression against a sovereign state, which allows not only to pursue an independent foreign policy, but really, not in words, to show concern for the welfare of its citizens. Resolution declared purpose of which was to provide a no-fly zone over Libya and the protection of civilians from violence, has become a kind of indulgence for the NATO warriors, the Release of personal liability for the cold-blooded intentional killing hundreds of innocent Libyans, including pregnant women and children, including infants, that makes these warriors on par with Hitler a moral monster, which they graciously freed Hitler from such chimeras as the conscience.
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Apparently does not suffer from pangs of conscience and the commander of British forces, General D. Richards, who categorically stated that if, during the air strikes, Qaddafi will die, then it "would not be okay." According to the general, it would not even a violation of any rules?! That is, killing a man without a trial, in terms of the British general who violates any rules not - neither moral nor legal?! We must assume that the same view is held by Supreme Commander of the British Armed Forces, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, who appointed to command his troops a "moral lawyer."

Went further a senior unnamed source from NATO, who said television channel CNN, that the UN Security Council resolution ... resolves to strike directly at al-Gaddafi. Perhaps this is true, at least, the UN Secretary General Ban Pak refute this claim was not. And this is not surprising, since the notorious Western "democratic and tolerant" of the world killing their opponents quite familiar everyday thing.
I will not remind about Fidel Castro, whom the U.S. intelligence services were trying to kill two hundred times, but because even the owner of the site Wikileaks J. Assange popular American politician S. Palin, a recent candidate for U.S. vice presidential, 29 November last year, unashamedly encouraged to pursue the same methods, as leaders of "Al Qaeda", that is, to kill. The next day, in an interview CBC News Network, Professor T. Flanagan, adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper (!?), even more brazenly in front of millions of television viewers also called for the assassination of John Assange and even advised President Barack Obama, how way to make it better. Is it any wonder that the NATO operation on the assassination of civilians and the Libyans Gaddafi personally led by Canadian Gen. S. Bouchard?
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Nevertheless, in spite of its pompous militancy situation in which hit western politicians and NATO command is very similar to the fundamental philosophical dictum of the famous novel by American writer J. Heller, "Catch 22" Catch-22) - they are well aware that without recognition of the ground operation humiliating defeat of the coalition of 28 countries in a war against a small state is inevitable, but they are much more clearly aware that its conduct would lead to even more cruel and humiliating defeat, also paired with the death of hundreds of their soldiers.

Despite repeated assurances about the unacceptability of ground operations in Libya, in fact, to carry it out and you're ready for a long time. But there is one very important factor - a high combat readiness of the Libyan regular troops, the NATO airstrikes in which teams Air Force practically no effect. Know and NATO has, and the rebels, so the first hesitant to land operation, and the latter, compelled to action by their Western masters, only simulate an attack on the positions of government troops and, with proper immediate resistance, immediately run away. Demonstrably a powerful rebuff to the nature of the use of tanks, heavy artillery and rocket launchers neither first nor second leaves no doubt that regular troops Gaddafi still have no problems with any heavy weapons or ammunition. The high morale of Libyan troops and say no.
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Undeniable "success" in fighting Nato field unfortunate pilots made except in the suppression of the Libyan radar stations, of which they were "bombed out" more than a dozen. True, the triumphant NATO on this issue immediately bring to mind the experience with the Serbian army general household microwave ovens to simulate the radar, which in 1999 NATO has bombed the same in Serbia, with exactly the same fervor. In contrast to the NATO forces, which, according to its leaders, there have been problems with lack of bombs, Libya's supply of microwaves such as inexhaustible as the ammunition, so that the "new radar" for a NATO bombing "aces" lack of will.

Alas, the perfect time for ground operations, "strategists" NATO has been ineptly lost. In the first couple of weeks the bombing, when in a state of confusion were not just ordinary Libyans, but both the army and public authorities of Libya, when migrant workers run away left without a livelihood of workers the company, so that there were serious shortages of gasoline, cleaning towns, the main food including bread, when the rebels stormed the Sirte, Gaddafi's home town, the question of the capture of Libya could be solved with high probability even landing airborne troops in the Tripoli. And then, as usual - the winners are not judged, and all who might object, would have been hanged as "criminals." In Iraq, the army run away with the option of regime change has been implemented quite successfully.

In Libya, at the moment it is impossible. Army is efficient, leaflets calling for surrender, which scatter NATO planes, as well as bombings, are no longer active. The government is monitoring the situation virtually throughout the state, except for a small area of the coastal area of Adzhdabii to the Egyptian border, including Benghazi and Tobruk. Controlled territory on an absolutely normal working all institutions, including training, regular payment of salaries, benefits, including unemployment benefit, organized by the uninterrupted supply of food and basic necessities. Gasoline at the pump for which, unlike the "pre-war" times, now we have to stand in line, still worth 12 cents per liter. Comparison with the mess on the territory controlled by rebels, where the children have lost school year, not to mention the lack of anything resembling any power structure is clearly not in favor of the latter. So the discontent of the masses "tyrannical regime Gaddafi 'western coalition of crusaders count obviously is not necessary, but in conjunction with the government handed out to these masses of tens of thousands of Kalashnikov assault rifles, the prospect of a ground invasion is quite sad.
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Funds from the government, again, unlike the rebels, too, all lacking. In spite of the frozen foreign accounts belonging to Libya (Qaddafi is not a clan!) $ 160 billion, the government is very well-disposed by the remaining "crumbs" of $ 20-25 billion dollars, which are placed in the banks of Asian and African countries. Perepoloshennaya such flagrant Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the headquarters of the African Union in Addis Ababa, even demanded that the heads of African states to end their support Gaddafi and the expulsion of its diplomats, but the result to no avail. In addition, as the newspaper reported The New York Times referring to its source in the CIA, in the Libyan Central Bank and other banks in the Libyan capital, the amount of stored multibillion-dollar cash. Moreover, apart from cash resources only to the International Monetary Fund, Central Bank of Libya has at least 144 tonnes of gold worth about $ 6.5 billion, of which up to now, by the way, no one gram is used up. So that the financial collapse of Libya or in the near future, either in a remote safe. Given the sharp reduction in funding of Libyan operation by the U.S. Congress, the money from Western coalition warriors-losers will end much sooner than the Libyan government.

On the attempt failed miserably and the food embargo of Libya. In order to avoid arrest en route to Libya ships with food and medical supplies and redirect them to Benghazi rebels, they are unloaded at the port of Tunis, Zarzis, by the way, just two hours drive from the Libyan border, from where all goods are transported by road to Libya. The persistent and still not stopping attempts by Western politicians and intelligence agencies to provoke between Libya and Tunisia, an armed conflict does not bring success. According to a recent statement made by the Ministry of Defence of Tunisia Colonel Mokhtar Ben Nasr, "Tunisia will never be used as a starting point for a ground attack on Libya."
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Undoubtedly, a great grief to Gaddafi and his whole family was the murder of NATO crusaders 29-year-old son Qaddafi Saif al-Arab, two grandsons and four-granddaughter. But on the other hand, this cruel and senseless murder of the latter-day crusaders not only rallied the Libyan people around their leader, showing that his family suffers from NATO bombing just like ordinary Libyans, but finally discredited the very idea of "peacekeeping" operation. After that Gaddafi began to sympathize with, even those who did not take either him personally or his methods of governance.

The only indubitable success of NATO's and, more precisely - the American "strategists" have the information war against Libya. We must acknowledge that the information space they actually blocked almost tight. By the way, even so far, most news agencies, including the openly sympathetic to al-Gaddafi, to characterize the initial phase of the operation to eliminate it using something like this "blank": "In mid-February in Libya, followed by other countries in North Africa and the Middle East, have begun mass rallies demanding the resignation of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, in power for over forty years. During the suppression of the demonstrators, which culminated in armed clashes between rebels and the government army, intervened in the conflict the UN Security Council, which set March 17 no-fly zone over Libya. To implement March 19 of this decision began a military operation of the international coalition, which since March 31, directs the NATO. "

Although it is now quite clear that in this "frozen" information stamp lies much more than the truth. If the reason for the "mass hysteria" is a fact of Gaddafi to power "more than forty years," then perhaps it is first necessary to overthrow Queen Elizabeth II, which is known to be at the mercy of nearly sixty years and, like Gaddafi , too, no one elected, no one will be elected and its successor. But, in this case, it is considered an internal affair of the British and nobody on this occasion, unlike Libya, is not going to bomb.
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Nor was there any "suppression of the demonstrators' by their absence, since in reality was an elementary provocation with some elements of staging. Moreover, the provocation was originally planned for 15 February, but at the last moment it had to be transferred to the 17th, but the timing of the transfer of all parties to prevent provocations did not have time, so some "free and independent democratic" media threw himself into the information "bell" on " mass disturbances "even the 15th, that is, Two days before the actual staging. In addition, a reasonable question arises about how and where were "opponents of the regime Gaddafi" is now and why for the past four months in the same Tripoli was no more than one "demonstration" of these "enemies", while the army is involved in long lines and disperse the demonstrations simply no one? And if all these "tens of thousands of opponents of Gaddafi," escaped from the "brutal tyrant" in the "democratic" Benghazi, then why even they can not collect on the "demonstration against Gaddafi" at least a hundred people, even if only for the cameras of journalists?

But to speak seriously of establishing a "no-fly zone over Libya," the sky is on residential homes, hospitals, schools, universities pour hail of bombs and missiles, and generally speaking indecently. Indeed, despite the fact that Gaddafi has called the UN resolution number 1973 "arrogant colonialism" and said that she was "no excuse", Libya, all requirements of resolution faithfully fulfilled in full and after its adoption airfields not take off any Libyan aircraft, m . e. Gaddafi gave no no reason for NATO's bombing of its territory. With regard to air defense, the representative of the African Command U.S. armed forces still D. Stockman 20 March stated that "the three missile strike made the day before, caused damage to varying degrees 20 out of 22 objects Libya defense," ie, according to NATO officials themselves as "objects of Defence Libya" have been knocked out in first day of operation. What are they, then, is still the fourth month of bombing to "establish no-fly zone over Libya?"
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

But the reason for the continued use of total misinformation stamps news agencies - not only in the power of Western information machine, the sophistication of technology dissemination and corrupt journalists who are ready to spread false information, but also the inability or unwillingness of the majority of states affected by information attacks, to arrange an appropriate rebuff at least those readily available to them and by means which are at their disposal. This equally applies not only to Libya and Syria, Iran, Belarus and other countries that are regularly exposed to information attacks, but do not have powerful media.

Yes, the Libyan state-run media denied access even to disseminate information via its satellite, but there are plenty of other opportunities to bring their information to the widest range of international public! Moreover, even without using the Internet, for example, why are not held weekly round tables (press conference) at the embassies of Libya, where you can bring to the journalists and politicians from other countries about the real situation? Instead, there is quite the opposite pattern, where, for example, the Embassy of Libya in Ukraine completely rejects all proposals on cooperation in this area by public organizations, journalists and individuals, including proposals to place information about real events in Libya on the popular and widely read Internet resources?!
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

It's no secret that most Western journalists, who are currently in Tripoli, are not interested in receiving and handing over to their offices to reliable information about current developments in Libya and in the performance of a single extremely "important," the editorial tasks - the first report the death of al-Gaddafi. And, naturally, top journalists, "good luck" for those "dragons pen" will be the picture of Colonel was killed. It will be clear what kind of materials they cook for their editorial offices in anticipation of the "main event". Unfortunately, the vast majority of CIS countries, including Russia, are also largely untrue information about real events in Libya, and, unfortunately, in most cases solely because of the lack of normal sources of information about these events.

It is true that at present the information blockade of Libya still gives considerable cracks, but, unfortunately, it is not as fast as it could be, and, oddly enough, little or no support official Libyan authorities. The first explosion of a powerful information for the western people were television reports CNN and BBC the missile firing on June 19 this year three-story apartment building in the quarter Suq al-Juma on the outskirts of Tripoli and the death of seven civilians, including two babies. In fact, this is the first television showing victims of NATO bombing and shelling, which is no longer able to silence anyone, because the shocking scenes they saw hundreds of millions of television viewers around the world. Nevertheless, NATO spokesman M. Bracken said the airstrike was an object ... anti-aircraft missile battery, and a NATO official communique issued on the same day reported that ... "To the air strike was a rocket launcher." It turns out that "high level of combat training," NATO pilots can easily mix up the three-story house with a "rocket launcher".
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Naturally, the wide display of the victims of NATO bombing - not the personal initiative of TV, as a consequence of growing dissatisfaction with certain political circles in the U.S. and Western Europe futility costly military operation, which finally came to a standstill. Norway has already announced the termination of August 1 of their participation in operations against Libya. Congressmen demand end of U.S. involvement in operations against Libya from Obama. In France, Sarkozy sued for crimes against humanity. The Minister of Internal Affairs of Italy, P. Maroni, publicly demanded "to stop spending money on the bombing of Libya" and expressed hope that "the war and the bombing would end." But Italian Foreign Minister Franco Frattini on 21 June, before a meeting of foreign ministers of the EU was forced to declare that "it is impossible to prevent the risk of killing civilians." And this is the Frattini, who on May 16 in a live TV channel Canale 5 said that the regime of Libyan leader Gaddafi remained "a matter of hours" because his entourage is looking for him a suitable place, where Gaddafi "could retire to permanently disappear from the political scene" .

But perhaps the most significant signal came from Britain, where one of the oldest newspapers in England Evening Standard, founded in 1827, on June 20 published an article by a well-known leading political commentator, Cecil H. (http://www.thisislondon.co.uk / standard/article-23962260-we-need-libya-exit-strategy-says-redwood.do), in which he expounds views on recent developments in Libya, one of the most respected Tory MP D. Redwood, at one time even claim for the post of party leader, who said that UK ... "We need an exit strategy from Libya, and immediately. All the humanitarian mission, mandated by the UN, has already achieved, and Gaddafi's too hard to kill: the hunt for him and his generals can lead to many deaths among the civilian population." Redwood also added that "when it comes to interfering in Arab affairs, the smaller the better. I look forward to the return of British troops home." As you know, Redwood is one of the UK those who are involved in the formation of the "views of the party", which he initially voiced as their own, and then, taking into account the reactions to it, this opinion is voiced by the government.
Click to expand...

to be continued

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Indeed, the declaration of termination due to full implementation of UN Security Council resolution number 1973, is currently the only excuse that allows the West to get out of another attempt to "dekaddafizatsii" Libya. In fairy tales, the truth about the emperor's new clothes says a little boy in real life out of stalemate offers authoritative veteran politician. But, just like in a fairy tale, and in Europe and the U.S., most sane people will sigh with relief at the fact that finally there was someone first who dared to publicly call for an end to this madness and militant NATO return of peace to Libyan-suffering land.
Click to expand...

the end the end... the end... the end...

MrRelevant · Jun 30, 2011

Wow if this doesnt fail the thread creation test what does?

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

MrRelevant said: ↑

Wow if this doesnt fail the thread creation test what does?
Click to expand...

Sorry ... I would like to introduce you to another view ... If you are not interested, I will not write any more articles from other countries.

SiliconMagician · Jun 30, 2011

Serves Europe right.

This is their fault entirely.

The USA did not want to provide anything but supply and moral support.

But no, that wasn't good enough. The Euros needed someone capable of actually knocking out a sophisticated SAM defense network.

So we did that and then we said, "okay euros! Have fun with your desert target practice" only 3 weeks later to hear they ran out of freakin bombs!??

Serves them right.

(*)(*)(*)(*) em, i support Qadaffi because

A)The man toot sweet disarmed and gave up all pretensions to any kind of weapon of mass destruction and was generally cooperative with President Bush and Obama on a wide range of issues.

B)The man provided no strategic threat to either Europe, or the United States of America, or any of our economic interests in the region. In fact the man was in the plus column as far as the world economy goes and Libya's production is sorely missed.

C)There is no proof that any of these "rebels" are anything that America would want to support in the struggle for their version of "freedom" and it seems that at least a sizable portion of the Libyan population does not support their struggle.

There are other reasons but those are big 3.

Mainly, I just like watching Europe fail miserably.

MrRelevant · Jun 30, 2011

Izverg said: ↑

Sorry ... I would like to introduce you to another view ... If you are not interested, I will not write any more articles from other countries.
Click to expand...

Thats not the issue.

Dont be sorry, just follow the rules.

Roadvirus · Jun 30, 2011

The fact that the combined operation of NATO forces in Libya deafening failed long ago it is no secret
Click to expand...

Failed? Really? Gaddafi barely controls 25% of the country. I see him gone by the end of July or mid-August.

Margot · Jun 30, 2011

Roadvirus said: ↑

Failed? Really? Gaddafi barely controls 25% of the country. I see him gone by the end of July or mid-August.
Click to expand...

Today's news about arms and uniforms and body armor is a real game changer IMO.

Roadvirus · Jun 30, 2011

Margot said: ↑

Today's news about arms and uniforms and body armor is a real game changer IMO.
Click to expand...

The rebels gaining access to one of Gaddafi's biggest weapon depots also helps.

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

MrRelevant said: ↑

Thats not the issue.

Dont be sorry, just follow the rules.
Click to expand...

I did not understand the rules. There's a lot of letters. But I'll try not to disturb them.

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

SiliconMagician said: ↑

Serves Europe right.

This is their fault entirely.

The USA did not want to provide anything but supply and moral support.

But no, that wasn't good enough. The Euros needed someone capable of actually knocking out a sophisticated SAM defense network.

So we did that and then we said, "okay euros! Have fun with your desert target practice" only 3 weeks later to hear they ran out of freakin bombs!??

Serves them right.

(*)(*)(*)(*) em, i support Qadaffi because
A)The man toot sweet disarmed and gave up all pretensions to any kind of weapon of mass destruction and was generally cooperative with President Bush and Obama on a wide range of issues.
B)The man provided no strategic threat to either Europe, or the United States of America, or any of our economic interests in the region. In fact the man was in the plus column as far as the world economy goes and Libya's production is sorely missed.
C)There is no proof that any of these "rebels" are anything that America would want to support in the struggle for their version of "freedom" and it seems that at least a sizable portion of the Libyan population does not support their struggle.
There are other reasons but those are big 3.
Mainly, I just like watching Europe fail miserably.
Click to expand...

I am pleased that the U.S. has normal people who think about the interests their country, not the аsshоle rebels from Libya.

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Roadvirus said: ↑

Failed? Really? Gaddafi barely controls 25% of the country. I see him gone by the end of July or mid-August.
Click to expand...

We'll see in the middle of August, who was right.

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Roadvirus said: ↑

The rebels gaining access to one of Gaddafi's biggest weapon depots also helps.
Click to expand...

The monkeys had access to weapons? And how long they can fight without the support of NATO? The people of Libya will destroy these beasts itself.

Margot · Jun 30, 2011

Izverg said: ↑

The monkeys had access to weapons? And how long they can fight without the support of NATO? The people of Libya will destroy these beasts itself.
Click to expand...

You must have missed the news today.

Do you live in Libya?

What makes you such a supporter of Khadafi?

Izverg · Jun 30, 2011

Margot said: ↑

You must have missed the news today.
Click to expand...

What news? Tell me, please!

Do you live in Libya?
Click to expand...

No, I have never been there.

What makes you such a supporter of Khadafi?
Click to expand...

I am not a supporter of al-Gaddafi. But I am opposed to the interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. In any military action. I think the Americans would not like military intervention, the Mexican government in the conflict in one of the southern states.

Margot · Jun 30, 2011

Izverg said: ↑

What news? Tell me, please!
No, I have never been there.

I am not a supporter of al-Gaddafi. But I am opposed to the interference of foreign states in the internal affairs of a sovereign state. In any military action. I think the Americans would not like military intervention, the Mexican government in the conflict in one of the southern states.
Click to expand...

The French and the Brits are supplying weapons and body armor to the rebels.

I did live in Libya briefly when my father was an oil exec there.

Khadafi is immature and reckless..

Look at the history of Tariki..

Log in or Sign up

Gaddafi on the eve of victory

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

MrRelevant New Member

Izverg Banned

SiliconMagician Banned

MrRelevant New Member

Roadvirus Well-Known Member

Margot Account closed, not banned

Roadvirus Well-Known Member

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Margot Account closed, not banned

Izverg Banned

Margot Account closed, not banned

Share This Page

Log in or Sign up

Gaddafi on the eve of victory

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

MrRelevant New Member

Izverg Banned

SiliconMagician Banned

MrRelevant New Member

Roadvirus Well-Known Member

Margot Account closed, not banned

Roadvirus Well-Known Member

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Izverg Banned

Margot Account closed, not banned

Izverg Banned

Margot Account closed, not banned

Share This Page

Useful Searches