Gay marriage is not a human right, according to European ruling

Discussion in 'Political Opinions & Beliefs' started by Professor Peabody, Sep 4, 2014.

  1. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,154
    Likes Received:
    4,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    That's I and the EU.
     
  2. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The EU is not making your argument- or your tortured logic.
     
  3. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,154
    Likes Received:
    4,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They are interpreting the meaning of article 12 exactly as I do, in direct contradiction of your interpretation.
     
  4. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Feel free to demonstrate that.

    I do get amused by Conservatives who normally are so offended by the EU- or anything European- suddenly becomes a fan if it can be used for an argument to discriminate against homosexuals.
     
  5. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,154
    Likes Received:
    4,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Referring to article 12 of the Convention

    “fundamental right of a man and woman to marry and to found a family”

    "enshrines the traditional concept of marriage as being between a man and a woman [and] cannot be construed as imposing an obligation on the Contracting States to grant access to marriage to same-sex couples"


    I do get amused by homosexuals and their advocates for years, constantly pointing to the European liberalism as the ideal to be emulated, not being able to accept this decision of the highest authority in European Human rights law.

    And yes I usually do disagree with many European ways, but can still respect their recognition of the meaning of words and their unwillingness to judicially dictate different meanings, like many US courts do.
     
  6. SFJEFF

    SFJEFF New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 1, 2010
    Messages:
    30,682
    Likes Received:
    256
    Trophy Points:
    0
    i.e. because it fits your agenda......
     
  7. dixon76710

    dixon76710 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    59,154
    Likes Received:
    4,614
    Trophy Points:
    113
    No, Id prefer an unwanted outcome over a desired outcome achieved by suspending the meaning of words.
     

Share This Page