Gay Rights Activists Outraged Over Billboard’s Message

I was quoting Conservative56.

 

I'm sorry that I keep having to repeat myself so I will capitalize the important parts so that you can read and understand. If the whole world turned FULLY and FAITHFULLY same-sex we would quickly go extinct. This is because if they are FAITHFUL to their homosexual partner THEY WOULD NOT ALLOW THE GAMETES OF ANYONE BUT THEIR PARTNER to be used in fertilization. The key word here is FAITHFUL to their partner as in not accepting any part of anyone else to penetrate them or be used in the creation of their children. Having or not having sex has nothing to do with anything I've said.

 

Artificially inseminating does not mean unfaithful.

Please just admit you made a stupid comment and got called on it instead of continuing to double down on stupid.

 

you are correct, leftist study after leftist study has shown no proof the theory of "born homosexual"

Given the Gallup poll where 96.4% of adults engage in heterosexual sex, then yes, to engage in other sex, including homosexual sex, is abnormal

You are also correct that the homosexual activists are pushing their opinion as being fact.

Where we part ways is where you become disrespectful and refer to homosexuals as inhalers of richard.

Look, they toss out baseless insults like the ever popular "bigot" and say it simply because you have a different opinion.

We then get to hear the all-time favorite perversion of the word phobia with the use of "homophobia"

So, let them be the ones who wallow with the swine and toss out insults and act childish.

 

If the whole world turned into kumquats the human race would be extinct too... so?

 

I'm sorry but I disagree. If you are artificially inseminated that means that you are having a child from a different person, correct? I'm sorry but having children from anyone but your spouse is being unfaithful to them. I understand that you might not be religious at all and that doesn't matter one bit. My "double down on stupid" is personal opinion as is yours yet I do not refer to yourself as posting "stupid" comments. Take what you like leave what you don't but it seams to me as though you are trying to get me to give up on my view labeling it as you do am I to assume that you are running out of the ability to debate the issue?

 

Except for every one that has?

Debunked.

Not really. Most of you are obviously bigoted. Pretending it's just a difference of opinion is extremely dishonest.

I'd say it's pretty accurate in most cases. Some people even try to delude themselves by saying "if I just don't have sex with that guy I'm attracted to, I'm really not a homosexual. REALLY IM NOT!!!!!!!!" Know what I mean ��

projection.

 

it is not a difference of opinion........it is hate.

What if it read
"Catholics are fools"
or weren't you recently upset about an anti-Christmas billboard?

 

exactly so it wouldn't be good for the human race to turn into kumquats would it?

 

It's also not going to happen... So what's your point?

 

Yes, we've seen how the anti-gay Right call people they disagree with "dick smokers" and tell them "tough ****"....and show how "tolerant" they are.

- - - Updated - - -

You see no irony in that one sentence....do you?

 

There is nothing to disagree with. It's a biological fact.

Incorrect. If you did it behind your partners back you would be correct.

The stupid I was referring to was the extinction comment.

There's nothing to debate. You made a factually incorrect and easily refutable claim.

If you want to debate the "morality" of homosexuality that's fine. We can do that. But making grossly incorrect statements is something entirely different.

 

And yet not all genetic identical twins look truly identical. There are often small differences in facial features, how quickly their nails and hair grows, etc.

So obviously even initial genetic duplication does not preclude dissimilar physiological development.

 

The point is that homosexuality cannot be wholly accepted and practiced by a species and have that species continue to exist. The idea of accepting LGBT tendencies as natural is ignorant as that goes against the very purpose and design of sexuality in a species. If it didn't matter we would all be asexual.

 

It's not just liberals who are disputing your claims, it's also Republicans and independents.

 

But it wouldn't hurt the human race to turn homosexual. They aren't sterile.

- - - Updated - - -

Soundly refuted.

yet hokosexuality has existed since the beginning of recorded human history.

 

Really? What are they then?... still sexually confused?

 

I apologize but so far you haven't refuted anything about what I said you've just rebutted with your own views

If it is so easily refutable then refute it. I said if we were to all go fully and faithfully same-sex then we'd go extinct. In my interpretation I was saying that you would not allow any sexual deviation from your partner which includes having a child from someone other than your spouse. You believe that it is perfectly ok as long as the spouse knows that you are having a child from another person, which is your right but don't expect me to cater to your interpretation as I don't expect any such thing from you.

 

Never said that they were

Where?

Once again had nothing to do with anything that I said

 

LOL

The whole "threat to the species" angle is the absolute dumbest argument homophobes have come up with. If your argument relies on an impossible fantasy world where everyone suddenly turned gay and absolutely faithful to one same sex partner, your argument is just stupid.

 

Uh no. You claimed humans would go extinct. i refuted that by pointing out that gay doesn't mean sterile.

Which I showed is incorrect.

Yes, if we forbid gays in your made up scenario from procreating then humans will go extinct. But that is called stacking the deck, as there is no reason that would happen.

And that's fine. But if you make up a scenario claiming humans would go extinct if they were all gay because having a child with anyone other than your partner is "cheating" I'm going to point out the obvious stupidity in that.

 

Well it's no worse than a fantasy world where everyone just openly accepts homosexuality. Neither is going to happen. This would be a lot shorter of a thread if we only talked about absolutes.

 

Then you agree if the entire human race became homosexual overnight, we would not go extinct. Thank you.

The post you quoted.

you claimed it is abnormal. I'm just pointing out that its so abnormal it has been around for humans entire existence.

 

Acceptance of homosexuality has been increasing around the world for decades. It's your ignorance that is being pushed aside.

 

I'm sorry but you didn't refute anything because I never said that gays were sterile. You cannot deny nor refute that in such a scenario the human race would be extinct. I don't care anything about stacking the deck as that was not the point of the debate. And this constant prattle over what you thought that I said is more boring than thought provoking. I made an absolute scenario knowing for a fact that it would never happen. I am religious and believe firmly that God would never let it happen. Once again the idea is to think about the sad state that humanity would be in if everyone just turned homosexual. Even with artificial insemination you cannot deny that numbers of humans wouldn't drop drastically as many homosexual couples prefer adoption over child bearing. With less new births the death toll would rise in impact on world numbers and the less people there would be the more difficult it would be to have any sort of relationship with anyone whether artificial or biological.